[00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress, the people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case, how to create affordable and accurate WordPress translations using AI.

If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you, or your idea, featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox and use the form there.

So on the podcast today we have Leonardo Losovic. Leonardo has been working with WordPress since 2012, developing plugins such as Gato GraphQL, a GraphQL server for WordPress, and more recently, Gato AI Translations for Polylang, a plugin that harnesses AI to streamline the process of translating WordPress websites.

After giving a talk at WordCamp Asia on the invisible gotchas of WordPress translation, Leonardo joins us to discuss both the moral and practical arguments for making your site multilingual, and how the technology has changed the landscape for site owners and developers alike.

I suspect that many listeners have considered translating their WordPress websites, whether for legal compliance or to reach a wider audience, but may be unsure where to start, or if the investment is worthwhile.

As Leonardo explains, the ease and affordability introduced by AI powered translation tools have changed the landscape. What used to require costly human translators and time consuming workflows can now often be handled with a few clicks, and for a fraction of the price.

Leonardo starts by sharing his background in plugin development, and the evolution of translation plugins over the

decade. We then get into how AI translations work, why manual oversight still matters, and how the new features coming to WordPress, such as collaborative editing and deeper AI integration will impact workflows and user experience.

We also discuss plugin strategies around managing multiple translations, SEO considerations, and the best practises for ensuring your translations are accurate and efficient.

Leonardo gives practical advice on how to avoid wasting resources when updating posts, and offers his perspective on the arms race of translation, as AI becomes ubiquitous, and why as it gets easier, keeping up with competitors becomes essential.

If you’re interested in making your site multilingual, or just want to hear how WordPress translation technology is evolving, this episode is for you.

If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

And so without further delay, I bring you Leonardo Losovic.

I am joined on the podcast by Leo Losoviz. Hello, Leo.

[00:03:40] Leonardo Losoviz: Hello, Nathan.

[00:03:42] Nathan Wrigley: It’s lovely to have you on the podcast today. Leo and I were hanging out at WordCamp Asia where you did a presentation, I think it’s correct to say. It was all about how you might translate things on your WordPress website, leveraging some of the solutions that Leo has built, but possibly just some things that might be baked into WordPress as well. So that’s going to be the discussion topic for today.

Before we crack into that, Leo, can you just tell us a little bit about you, your background with WordPress, and probably the stuff that you’ve been doing recently, which touches on translations?

[00:04:14] Leonardo Losoviz: Alright. So I’ve been working with WordPress since 2012, and I have a plugin called Gato GraphQL, which is a graphical server for WordPress. I’ve been working on that since like forever now.

And then I upgraded to try to make plugins that can be used by the final user of the website, bloggers and marketing people, not just developers. And then I launched another plugin that is called Gato AI Translations for Polylang. It’s basically a wrapper of my other plugin that will help people translate their websites using AI. And I have been working with this plugin for over one year now. And, yeah, I mean this is what I’m doing.

[00:04:54] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. And how did your presentation at WordCamp Asia go? Were you happy with the delivery and the attendance and things like that?

[00:05:00] Leonardo Losoviz: Delivery. Yes. Actually, I think it came out quite good. You can check it out, it’s on YouTube. Attendance? Not really. My talk was the first one on the second day of the conference. It was 9:30 AM. Everybody was either sleeping or they were drinking coffee outside. We did have people showing up slowly. Maybe by the end of the presentation there were people who were like, hey, this appeared to be good. Too bad that I didn’t come here on time.

[00:05:23] Nathan Wrigley: I hope you forgive me because I was one of those people. I dropped in towards the end. I certainly enjoyed the latter part of your talk. So you’ve built a whole load of solutions around the capacity, the capability to make your WordPress website go from language A to language, B, C, D, E, and so on and so forth. I will just read the blurb about what your presentation was called and also what it was about.

And so the presentation title was The Invisible Gotchas of WP Translation. And then the blurb surrounding that was nice and short, and it goes like this. This talk walks through a practical checklist to turn, we should translate, into a precise plan that leaves no strings untranslated. Attendees will leave with a practical end-to-end approach to translating WordPress content that leaves nothing to chance.

So my first question then is really focused on the, we should translate, that little bit. Let’s make the case for, I suppose the moral argument, not the technological argument. Now, it might be a moral argument, but it also might be a legal argument. I’m just wondering where you think we stand in terms of whether you have to, or should, translate things at this point in time.

[00:06:34] Leonardo Losoviz: Well, I guess that if you have to out of legal requirements, then you will have to. So that is out of the equation. If you’re compelled to do it, then that’s part of your business. It’s a business requirement, so you’ll have to do it.

The key question is, if you don’t have to, I mean, nobody’s forcing you to do it, should you still do it? And the answer is, yes, of course you should, because it will help you. Why wouldn’t you do it if you can do it? If you have potential visitors to your website speaking different languages, why wouldn’t you want to track them? Why wouldn’t you want to show your content to new, like a new user base? The key question is, as long as you can do it, do it.

[00:07:13] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I think that’s an interesting point. So certainly in the part of the world where I live, there is a lot of legislation around what must be done. So for example, I’m in the UK and we have a variety of different languages spread throughout the country. And depending on where you live and what your business is involved in, you may be compelled to do it. And so, as you say, that’s just the way it is. You know, you don’t have any choice around that.

But I think now, especially with the advent of technologies which enable translation to happen at the speed of light, more or less, it becomes increasingly a question of, well, why wouldn’t you do that?

And so I’m kind of keen to explore the things that have changed over the last, let’s say decade. That’s probably a bit too long, but something along those lines, to make it easier to translate. In the past, I’ve interviewed lots of founders of plugins that do translations. Let’s say 10 years ago, this was a fairly lengthy, probably quite costly enterprise. Translating, let’s say an English site into, let’s say a German site.

Because you had to figure out which bits of the website needed to be translated. You probably had to go somewhere to find a human that could do that translation work. You then had to negotiate the price for that, receive the translated text, and then somehow figure out how to make it so that the English string is converted into the German string, and so on and so forth. I’m imagining that’s no longer the case. Where are we at in April, 2026 in terms of the ease of getting things translated? And probably, I think we’re going to stray into AI here.

[00:08:45] Leonardo Losoviz: Yes, the answer is AI. Truth is that with AI you can translate your content very easily and the quality is just excellent. I will not tell you to not engage a professional translator if you don’t speak the language, just to make sure that the translation is right. Mostly when we’re talking about technical terms, or when they refer to some industry that your website is targeting. Otherwise, the quality is just excellent.

I would say that with AI, you can rely on it, I don’t know, maybe 99% of the translation seems accurate. If there’s some ambiguity around some technical term, then you might still want to have a professional translator. But even then, you know that you don’t need to engage the translator for the 100% translation. But only to pay attention to those details, possibly fix those errors, make sure the technical acronyms are correct and that kind of stuff.

So clearly the pricing tag that now you have compared to five years ago has gone down dramatically. You have to pay for the tokens. Basically, when you engage one of these AI providers, either Open AI or Anthropic or Gemini, you are paying to them for tokens to perform the translation. But that is literally like very little money. It can be like cents on the dollar.

In the past when you have, not just the past but also the present, you have company providing translation services. They will charge you much, much, much more than that. Maybe it will be like 50 USD per hour. Maybe it’ll be like 100 USD per hour for a professional translator. And then you have to engage them maybe five hours to translate one blog post, or, I don’t know, like five blog posts, it doesn’t matter. Now that the amount of work that you need to engage them just to double check, instead of five hours, will be maybe 30 minutes. So you are still spending money to engage the professional translator, but much, much, much less.

And that means that if you do have the budget, now instead of translating one language, you are talking, Nathan, about legal requirements, possibly your country has two or three different languages. I don’t know, if you’re from Canada, you might speak English and French. Maybe they will ask you to translate your websites to English and French. But now you can say, okay, well now, if I had the money and it’s so easy to translate using AI, I can translate to many more languages and also target people, not just from Canada, but from other regions of the world.

And then you can also translate to Spanish. Why not? And you can translate to Portuguese. So the situation now is that prices went down dramatically, the quality of the translation using AI is really, really, really high and you will need professional services only in those cases that you need to be 100% sure that translation is valid when it is a professional industry.

[00:11:25] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I suppose the, as you described, the acronyms and things like that, the technical language, I guess if you’ve just got a blog where, in my case I’m just using plain English, an ordinary set of words, I’m not ever going to be delving into complexity, and that may be the case for many people. I think I agree with you that the AI will probably do an admirable job.

But the minute you start to stray into unusual words, or technical things where, I don’t know, you’re referencing some aspect of physics or biochemistry or something like that, then I can see exactly why you might need to do that.

But also, interestingly, the budget has obviously shrunk to get that translation done from perhaps many hundreds of dollars down to perhaps a handful of US cents. But still, if you want to be compliant and you’ve got an intuition that your language may be straying into a grey area where AI might not do a perfect job, that is now where the budget is going. It’s just sort of polishing it up a little bit and making sure that, okay, that actually is highlighted.

Can I ask a question related to that? Do the AIs, when you ask them to translate things, do they come back with, okay, we’ve done our best, but we are confused by this portion or that portion? Or do they typically just hand back, this is our translation, go figure it out for yourself from there?

[00:12:43] Leonardo Losoviz: When we’re talking about my plugin, Gato AI Translations, you get the translation straight because you’re not interacting with the AI. You are asking straight for the response and that response, you add it, you embed it into your blog post. There is no interaction with the person.

So basically, you can do that, you could feed the content to ChatGPT and tell ChatGPT, translate it, and if you have any doubt, please ask me. And then ChatGPT will talk to you, and then we say, I don’t know how to translate this word. Should I say this or should I say that? But that is in the context of the interface when you’re talking to ChatGPT or you’re talking to Claude. In a plugin where you want to collect the string and just add it into the translated blog post, you don’t have that interaction. So it really depends on your use case.

[00:13:29] Nathan Wrigley: The plugins that I’ve seen in the past that have been tackling this job in WordPress, and again, we’re going back many, many years prior to AI. There was a lot of UI involved. You would have to log into the WordPress website. Let’s say it was a blog post, you would go to the blog post and usually lurking somewhere in meta, so in a box somewhere else would be the original string and then the translated string. And that would typically have been done by a human. And you’d probably copy and paste that back, or maybe the platform, the plugin would actually facilitate the putting of that text into that box by somebody that’s logged into the platform who’s paid to do the translations.

But the point being, there was a lot to look at. If you had a German translation and a Portuguese and a Lithuanian and Russian and, you know, on you go. Every time you add one of those in the UI becomes much more complicated and what have you. So I’m curious to see in 2026, how do you manage that? How is that all done? What does the UI look like? In an era of AI when we are increasingly typing and talking to our software, have you leveraged that and sort of tried to minimise the UI in a way?

[00:14:34] Leonardo Losoviz: Okay, so there are two responses to this. One is what I’m doing right now, and what I expect WordPress to offer coming soon. So what I am doing now with my plugin is just to do the translation. And you have one blog post in, say in English, your origin language, and then you select it from the post list, and you have this dropdown in the bulk actions with all the actions that you can execute with the post. And you just say, translate. And when you do that, it will duplicate the post from the origin to all of the translations.

You can have one translation, you can have 17 translations. It will create all of those 17 entries, and it will already translate all the content to the target language. So then if you want to edit the translation, if you want to fix it, then you’ll just edit the translation and then there you will see there’s something that doesn’t appear right, and then you fix it in the WordPress editor.

In my scenario right now, we go from nothing to everything. There’s no in between. Now with WordPress 7.0, they’re adding two things. One is adding the AI Connector. So we will have more and more and more capabilities to interact with AI. And the other thing that we have that is unrelated, but I think it will end up being related is phase three, which is the communications in the WordPress editor, right? That two people can communicate with each other, like Google Docs style.

And so we’ll have these windows on the right hand side from the WordPress editor, right? So you can add a comment. Somebody can add a comment saying, hey, do you think this is right? And the other person on the other side can say, yeah, this needs to be fixed. So they can communicate via the WordPress editor. Whereas right now you have two people interacting with each other. You can have one person and one AI.

So then imagine the scenario where you translate everything and then you edit the translated post. And you might have those same windows with a kind of sticky post, and pointing an arrow to some word saying, hey, I’m not sure if this is the right translation. Please check it out.

So I can see that WordPress 7.0 will give use the infrastructure to start adding this additional interaction. So then I could translate all the content as I’m doing right now. And if I find out from the AI that a world has not been, it doesn’t have 100% confidence that it’s the right translation, maybe we can use that phase three functionality to add a sticky post to have the AI interact with the person, say, hey, this translation, I’m not sure, please double check.

[00:17:04] Nathan Wrigley: This leverage is so much interesting stuff. So again, just in case the user hasn’t been keeping up with the WordPress news, 7.0 has, or WordPress 7.0 I should say, has this capability which wasn’t quite ready for the WordCamp Asia release. The idea was to release 7.0 at WordCamp Asia, but because of technical reasons, there was something that needed to be changed and amended about the way that data was handled and stored in different tables.

7.0 will bring the capability to have collaborative editing, so think Google Docs. And it really didn’t occur to me until quite recently, because somebody suggested exactly what you said, I was always imagining another human being, being in that interface. So it would be me and Leo having a conversation through comments or what have you in that same WordPress post.

But of course now we realise, well, of course, the AI work, the MCP and the adapters and all of those kind of things allow that thing in the post to be not a human being, it could be an AI. And so that’s really interesting.

So maybe we’ll come in, have a conversation, something along the lines of, please could you just check, this would appear to be fine but there seem to be a few errors here and there and everywhere, and it may be able to come back with a suggestion.

That stuff is so powerful, but yet completely unrealised at the minute. It’s kind of just on the horizon, but when that feature drops, I think that will be quite an interesting experience. You’ll be able to talk about the content with an AI, based upon what is in the content area of WordPress. That’s going to be really, really fascinating. Gosh, wow. What a future.

Is that stuff ready? Do you know if WordPress is going to ship with those kind of capabilities? So you mentioned things like the sticky post to sort of highlight, imagine a post-it note or something like that. Something which can highlight? Are all of those foundational pieces ready or were you just sort of blue sky gazing there?

[00:19:02] Leonardo Losoviz: I haven’t seen it, but we can all picture that happening. So you know that 7.0 is giving us the foundation to build all of the things. Once the foundation is there, it’s up to the community to implement these use cases. So yeah, I’m quite confident that it will happen, but I haven’t seen it. I haven’t seen it yet.

[00:19:19] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I do love the idea though, of communicating through that interface. That’ll be really interesting to see how that changes the calculus of how we write things and who we write them with and all of that kind of thing.

So Gutenberg, which we don’t talk about too much really at the moment, but Gutenberg had four phases when it was first talked about. So we’re in phase three at the moment, which is this collaborative editing. Broadly it was collaborative editing was the poster child of that release.

And the fourth one, so that may be many years away, I don’t know when phase four will come about, but the fourth one is bound very much to translation. Do you know if there’s any sort of foundational work being done over there? It may still be a complete black box. It’s just the word we’re going to deal with translations. Do you have any wisdom or insight into what’s happening over there?

[00:20:03] Leonardo Losoviz: No. All I know is that Matt Mullenweg was postponing that for the very, very, very end. And since we’re still working on phase three, I don’t think that there will be any phase four work happening anytime soon.

[00:20:16] Nathan Wrigley: No. Okay. So we’ll have to wait and see how that drops. But it could be another interesting phase. Let’s see what that does.

So, okay, now let’s sort of dig into the weeds of how your system works. So you mentioned that if I’m in the data view for posts, one of the options that I have when I’m hovering over a post, you know, delete post, edit post, what have you. It sounds like in there somewhere you inject a translate. And presumably when you hit that button, automations that you’ve previously set up, say, translate to French, translate to Portuguese, translate to Chinese and Japanese, that would then be triggered.

Do you then create separate posts? So that the post that’s now in Chinese is separate to the original one, or as some plugins handle it, do you take the original one and just inject metadata into that post?

[00:21:04] Leonardo Losoviz: If we’re talking about my plugin, my plugin is called Gato AI Translations for Polylang. I depend on Polylang. So Polylang is a plugin that works by creating separate entries for each of the languages. So you have a post in English, and when you translate it, you’ll create another post in French and another one in Spanish and another one in Portuguese.

Then you have a different plugin like WPML which has a different strategy, which is to have only one post and then all the individual strings are translated on runtime. So you’re not statically creating different versions of the post, but you have only one post and then you translate the strings, the actual content.

It really is up to what is the best strategy for your site, what it is that you are most comfortable working with. There are other plugins, of course. There is TranslatePress, there is Weglot, MultilingualPress. They all have different strategies. I do like Polylang because the post is created in advance. Then all the same rules for your WordPress site apply. You can cache the page, you can export it statically, and it also is fast because you don’t need to translate the string.

Like finding a specific string can be very expensive. Like a string, you know, that you need to find from English and translate to French. The string might be like, I mean 1000 characters long. You know, that can become very expensive. And if you do that on runtime, even if you cache it later, that can be very expensive. Yeah, my plugin is based only on Polylang, but it’s not the only plugin.

[00:22:28] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. So there’s a whole range of different things out there, but you’ve obviously opted for Polylang. Is that a commercial kind of pro plugin or do they have a, is there a free version that you can leverage?

[00:22:37] Leonardo Losoviz: Yeah. It’s free. And they have the pro version that is, I think 99 USD per year for one domain, if I’m not wrong. But it’s completely optional, you can use Polylang free and it’s more than enough. Actually, Polylang Pro, they have a few features and the main feature that they had historically is that you could use machine learning for translating the content.

They use DeepL as a service, like Google Translate. Now the thing is that I wouldn’t use DeepL anymore. Even my own plugin, at the very beginning had, even nowadays, it has integration for Google Translate and for DeepL. But AI is so much superior than those. So you can still use Polylang Pro for the other features, but the machine translation one, there’s no need, Polylang free, more than enough.

[00:23:23] Nathan Wrigley: So when, let’s say for example, that I’ve got a post and I’ve translated it. I’m just beginning my journey, figuring stuff out. And again, we’re talking about your solution here. So, you know, you can speak to how it works, not how all the other ones work.

I click the translate button and I’ve now got six posts, the English original and then these five other languages. How does that surface? Are they like child posts of the original post? Is there an easy way for me to see, okay, here’s the German version of that, and it’s bound to this? Is there a filter system or what have you?

And then how does that look on the front end? So if the original string is, I don’t know, example.com/post-one, am I from an SEO point of view, does that stay nice and tidy? Like, I don’t know, it goes example.com/g for German, forward slash post-one, or how does that all tie together?

[00:24:13] Leonardo Losoviz: All right, so this is once again, a feature provided by Polylang. When you create the translations, all the posts, they’re all parallel to each other. They don’t have a hierarchy. They’re not like the child post from the origin post. And if you want to only see the post for one specific language, there is a switch, like a switcher button at the top menu bar, and you can select the language.

So by default it says all languages, and then you’ll have all the posts. So in a way, if you have, say that you have 10 posts and then you have 10 languages, that means that you have now 100 posts. So it can be a bit clutter. So then you go to the top menu and then you select English, and then it only shows you the English ones.

And the important thing is that, say you’re using AI to translate, you only need to deal with the origin post and nothing else, until you need to double check if the translation is right, maybe fix one thing here, one thing there. But otherwise, the whole time you are only dealing with the origin post.

So what I do is I always have my selector in that origin language. So it’s in English and I only see the English post. So then I do translate, and I know that the translation will be created alongside all of the categories, and all of the tags and all the feature image, right? But I don’t need to deal with them. So then I also don’t need to see them on my screen. They create clutter, so then I remove them.

And then to see them, to visualise them, yeah, once again, Polylang, it gives you the option of choosing the language by appending the language code in the URL. So mysite.com/fr/the-slug, that’s for French. Or you can also use subdomains. So you can have fr.mysite.com/the-slug. So that’s something that you can configure. And then basically when you go to that page and you add the language code in the URL, then you will see that blog post for the selected language.

And the way that Polylang handles all of this is it connects a post to all of its translations via a specific taxonomy, like a tag that they created, I think it’s called language, if I’m not wrong, or language relationship, I’m not completely sure now. And so it ties all the post to all of its translations. And the thing is that then when you go to the post in French, it can add the href lang meta tag that is telling Google that this post is a translation of that post.

So that is important for SEO purposes that these posts are not two independent entities, but one is a translation of that one for French. So Google will understand a lot of the relationships, and if the user who is searching for information, they’re searching for information in French, then Google will know to serve the French page. And if it is in Spanish, Google will know to serve the Spanish page.

[00:27:01] Nathan Wrigley: It’s an amazing wraparound solution, isn’t it? In that all of this is just sort of handled and what you essentially end up doing is, the user that is, you click the translate button and once you’ve got everything set up correctly, it just, off it goes.

I have a question though about amendment. So let’s say for example, I realised that my blog post was full of inaccuracies and errors and there’s just wrong throughout it. And I then go in and I make amendments. Do I then need to restart that whole translation process or can I rely on it kind of figuring out, okay, amendments were made, let’s just do that automatically for you? How does amendments to the original, in my case, English work?

[00:27:37] Leonardo Losoviz: Yeah, well, I would change that. I would say do not do any translation until you’re 100% sure that the post is final. And that’s the main way to waste your time, and to waste money in tokens. Because you execute the translation, and then you realise that something was wrong. Maybe this H2 tag was supposed to be an H3, then you fix it, and then you run the translation again. And then you realise that was another mistake, there was a typo. And then you had to run the translation again. And then you’re like, oh, but that image has embedded text in the image. It doesn’t work on the translated post. And then you run the translation again.

So all of these things are common sense, and you don’t think about them until you see the error happening time and again and again. So what I do is I have a checklist actually on my website. I have a blog post where I have every single item that we need to pay attention to in advance of executing the translation. So executing the translation is when you go to the post list, you select the post, and then you select translate. Easy, and it takes five seconds.

But before you do that, you need to make sure that the post is final. That means no typos. That means all the headers are the right header. That means that all images are correct. They have alt attributes. They have the title that you need. There’s no embedded text in the image, even adding an embed from another source.

Say that you have a YouTube video that you’re embedding on your content, and the YouTube video is in Spanish. When you translate that to French, maybe the YouTube video is not useful anymore. So all of these things you need to check from a multilingual point of view when you’re looking at your origin post. And then you’re like, okay, this origin post, now it’s okay. It’s perfect. You publish the post, then you translate.

[00:29:26] Nathan Wrigley: I got it. Yeah, I mean that makes sense. But, should you need to, it’s a process of clicking the button again and kind of beginning that process. But yeah, good idea to have those checks and balances.

I was at an event not that long ago in which AI was used inside of a WordPress plugin, inside of a post, to ascertain the content of things like images and infographics. So as an example, there was data held inside of a graph. So, I don’t know, whatever that data was, bar charts, pie charts you can imagine, but also just images and what have you. And although this may not be handled and maybe it’s blue sky thinking, I was wondering what the capabilities are for handling those kind of things.

So in the case of an image with a chart in it, wouldn’t it be nice if we could replicate that chart, but instead of all the labels being in English, if they could be in German or French or whatever it may be. I don’t know if that’s utterly out of the scope, even in blue sky thinking in terms of AI and translations. But I was curious if you had an inkling whether things that were not just text-based content might be handled in the future as well by AI. Not specifically addressing what you do at the moment, but whether that seems to be on the horizon.

[00:30:41] Leonardo Losoviz: Yeah, well, to be honest, I think technically it is feasible, but even if it can be done, I don’t think it should be done. And the thing is this, I’m promoting that we can translate our websites to as many languages as possible, only because we can. So you have your website in one language, then you can have it in two, then you will have it in five. You can have it in 30 languages. Why wouldn’t you do it? If you can target new countries and new visitors, sure, go ahead and do it. AI gives you the possibility.

But now imagine that you also want to translate the images. Every single image on your website will be replicated 30 times. That sounds scary. I wouldn’t do that. What I will do is to have one single image that is language agnostic, that there’s no text inside. And if you had to add text, maybe in your page builder, maybe in Gutenberg or Elementor or Bricks, maybe you can create an overlay and place the text on top. It’s a more difficult solution and a bit more complex, but it’s clean because then you can translate that as part of text, and the image, you don’t need to replicate the image 30 times.

[00:31:44] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, that’s an interesting point. And that leads me to wonder whether it’s possible to, for example, an image caption. Whether it’s possible to translate that into 30 different languages whilst still referencing the exact same image.

So, I don’t know, in English it might say, here is a picture of a dog walking by a beach, and then the French equivalent caption, and the German equivalent caption and what have you. Then in effect, you’ve recycled the same image, but you’ve also, the person viewing it in German would get the German equivalent of that. Again, I don’t know if that’s possible, but maybe that’s an interesting.

[00:32:14] Leonardo Losoviz: Yeah, actually that’s how it is right now. So when you translate the post, you will also translate all of the entities associated to the post, the tags and the categories and the featured image. So the featured image will have meta data associated. So when you upload an image to the media manager, you add meta data, the title, you can add a caption. So all of that text, it’s in one language.

Now, you can also translate the image by creating a new entry, once again using Polylang. The image has a language associated, so the origin image will be in English, and you can create a new entry in French, and the title will be translated to French and the caption will be translated to French. But the image itself is the same for both entries. So the JPEG or the PNG, that one is not duplicated. So you’re not increasing the size of your hard drive. You’re creating another entry on the database for the media entry, the custom post media, or the attachment, but not for the actual physical file.

[00:33:11] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. So it’s much more lean, basically doing it that way, isn’t it? I didn’t actually know that it was done that way, but that’s certainly how Polylang handles that. Okay, that’s interesting.

So you mentioned that, I think one of the through lines in what you’ve been saying is because you can do it, why not just do it? It kind of makes sense when you think about it like that, but I’m just wondering what the real world impact of this is. You know, in terms of things like discoverability, and whether or not it really genuinely does have an impact on your business. Let’s say for example, I don’t know, you’re shipping widgets from England to France, and suddenly you translate your site into Japanese and Chinese.

I would assume that that could only have a positive effect, but also, equally, I’d want to know what the data was on that. And I don’t know if you have, given that you are in the translation space quite heavily, I don’t know if you have any data to hand which would compel people to do this, to prove, look, it really is worthwhile. Anecdotally, it feels like it would definitely be worthwhile. Why not, would be the way of phrasing it. But I don’t know if there’s any data lurking in your head which would categorically say, oh yeah, this is definitely it.

[00:34:16] Leonardo Losoviz: Nathan, unfortunately, we’re screwed.

[00:34:19] Nathan Wrigley: The answer is no.

[00:34:20] Leonardo Losoviz: Because when it’s so easy, everyone will do it. And when everybody does it, you’re not moving forward. You’re just moving, you’re running just to be on the same spot. If you’re the only one who is translating your site to 20 languages, you will be far ahead from everybody else. But because it’s easy to you, it’s easy to everybody. And if everybody does the same, once again, you are not ahead of them. You’re on the same place.

So this is the problem of technology, right? And the problem of AI. Now we’re all very productive with AI. I’m using AI to code my plugin, and I think I’m pulling ahead. But my competitor is also using AI to code his plugin. So we are both running just to stay on the same place. So in a way, unfortunately, it becomes a situation in which you need to do it just to not fall behind.

[00:35:07] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, it’s kind of like the arms race mentality in a way, isn’t it? But also, that’s quite a compelling way of framing it, because you can be sure that, okay, if you’re writing a blog and you’ve got a limited audience, maybe there’s limited scope in that. If you are in a business and you are, certainly if you have pretensions of dealing over international borders and your competitors are doing this, it is exactly that arms race mentality, isn’t it?

Then you are compelled to do it just to be ordinary, just to be the baseline. 20 years ago, would’ve been entirely different because of that would’ve been a very expensive calculation and translating into, let’s say, Japanese. If there’s no ROI on the Japanese translation, that is money which would’ve been probably wasted.

Now, with AI costing literal cents to translate, it does feel like that is the calculus, right? We are doing it because it can be done and we know that the competitors will be doing it, so we ought to do it as well. Maybe that’s all the argument needs to be. It’s simply that, simply stated in that way.

[00:36:12] Leonardo Losoviz: That’s a good reason to do it, which is that you want to target people in other countries, speaking other languages. So yes, I want to do it, but at the same time, if I see that my competitors are doing it, then I have to do it. I can see it both ways.

[00:36:25] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. Okay. It’s certainly been an interesting conversation. What I’ll do is I will ask Leo to provide me with links that are pertinent. Maybe we can get the wordpress.tv of the presentation that you did, plus links to the websites which have been mentioned in this podcast episode. If you go to wptavern.com and you search for the episode with Leo Losoviz. His name is spelled L-O-S-O-V-I-Z or Z, depending on where you live in the world. If you go and search for that, then you’ll be able to find a transcription of this as well as links to the various different bits and pieces that we have mentioned.

Leo, before we wrap it up, is there anything else you wanted to say? If not, we will bid you adieu.

[00:37:07] Leonardo Losoviz: No, not really.

[00:37:09] Nathan Wrigley: You’ve got it. In which case we will call that a day and say thank you very much, Leo, for chatting to me today. Really appreciate it,

[00:37:15] Leonardo Losoviz: Thank you, Nathan.

[00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress. The people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case a second look at exploring AI’s impact in WordPress agencies.

If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you, or your idea, featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox, and use the form there.

So on the podcast today, for a second time, we have Matt Schwartz.

Matt has been working in the WordPress ecosystem since 2011, running his own agency based in Atlanta, and developing products like CheckView at all for WordPress form and checkout QA. Matt’s expertise lies in how agencies can smartly, and cautiously, incorporate AI into their workflows for real tangible wins, and how to avoid potential pitfalls.

He was on the show last week to record the first of this two part mini series. You might want to listen to that prior to this, but it’s not strictly necessary.

In this episode, we build upon last week’s conversation. Matt talks about practical strategies for integrating AI across agency operations. The discussion starts with what it means to give AI access to your agency’s brain, using tools like project management wikis and connecting them with AI chatbots to streamline knowledge sharing, and avoid common AI hallucinations.

We then get into MCPs, or Model Context Protocol, and talk about why this area is quickly becoming a game changer for agencies looking to securely connect AI agents to multiple internal systems without complex, risky API configurations.

The conversation covers how to use AI for building internal tools, highlighting where it’s low risk and where you should be more cautious, especially with public facing, or mission critical, systems. Matt explains how agencies can leverage AI for QA and checklist automation, freeing up time for deeper human review of other important tasks.

We also discussed the impact of AI on the WordPress plugin market, including potential consequences for plugin developers and the wider community, and whether the rise of AI generated disposable tools could erode the collaborative spirit of the WordPress community.

We end by chatting about the importance of approaching agency AI adoption with eyes wide open to the risks. Data security, overdependence on vendors, failure to handle errors, and the reality that AI still makes mistakes.

Matt shares his outlook on how agencies can position themselves to thrive as AI reshapes the industry, from hiring strategies to the next generation of productised services.

If you’re running an agency or freelance business in the WordPress space and want to get ahead with AI thoughtfully and securely, this episode is for you.

If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

And so without further delay, I bring you Matt Schwartz.

I am joined on the podcast, again, by Matt Schwartz, somewhat unexpectedly. Hello, Matt.

[00:04:05] Matt Schwartz: Hey Nathan, thanks again for having me this week. I’m super excited to dive back in.

[00:04:09] Nathan Wrigley: Thank you. So we recorded an episode last week, and we intended to do it as a one hit. So get it all recorded, tied off within 40 minutes or what have you. And then we began talking.

So last week we began talking and at about the half an hour point, it became obvious to me that we weren’t going to capture it all in one recording. So we’ve come back for a second episode.

Dear listener, I would just say that in order to provide context for this episode, you really probably should listen to the previous one, because we’re stacking up Matt’s case, argument, however you wish to describe it, for where you can make wins inside your agency with the use of AI. Not just wins, maybe some cautionary tales as well. But that was the point of the first episode.

So really, we’re going to drop you in to the ninth of 16 points. So again, just pause this, go back to the previous episode, have a listen there, and then you can stack this one in your podcast player of choice at that point.

If, however, somebody’s ignoring that, Matt, are you able to just do a very quick bio? Just tell us who you are? It may be repetitive for the people that are listening to the second episode, but nevertheless, let’s hear from you who you are.

[00:05:16] Matt Schwartz: Yep. My name’s Matt Schwartz. I run a WordPress agency here in Atlanta, since 2011. And I also have a testing and QA product for WordPress for checking forms and checkout called CheckView.

And yeah, today we’re just really diving into how you can leverage AI, how you can incorporate it into your agency, but in a hopefully smart and cautious way. Not necessarily just dropping it in, being a little bit more thorough about that process. So excited to continue the conversation.

[00:05:45] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, thank you. And thank you for being so accommodating by joining me for a second time. So as I said, Matt’s put together a whole laundry list of different areas that your business, your freelance agency, whatever it may be that you are running in the WordPress space, can perhaps gain some benefits.

Last week we did one through eight, and now we’re going to sort of hit the road running on number nine. So the ninth point was about giving AI access to your agency’s brain. It’s a lovely subheading, but what does that mean?

[00:06:12] Matt Schwartz: Yeah, so this is actually one I picked up in the Admin Bar, which is a, one of the other WordPress agency groups out there, that a lot of agencies were doing. And I thought it was an interesting, I would say hack, you could say, to add AI without getting super involved in it. Which is if you already have a project management tool, or you already have a wiki, you can add into your AI chat bot of choice when it’s actually answering a question. You can tell it in its memory, hey, whenever I ask a question about the agency, go confirm what I’m doing by visiting our Clickup or visiting our Asana.

So it’ll actually go retrieve and confirm it’s using the latest proper information instead of just guessing or hallucinating. I love how we use the word hallucinate and not lie. I love that marketing branding that the AI companies did. It’s some crazy gaslighting.

Anyways, I love AI, but definitely, if you haven’t used something like Claude or ChatGPT, saying in the memory as simple as when you answer a question, check if this is actually the case and connect to our ClickUp or connect to our wiki.

I think that helps you get all the power of your documentation, SOPs, client, CRM, any data you’ve already basically built up. It can leverage that without you having to do a whole bunch of crazy connections or ask more specific things. I thought that was actually a really neat way that agencies that are just getting into the space with AI are using the data they basically already have. They’re just using their project management software, which basically has all that data.

[00:07:47] Nathan Wrigley: When you see it in action, which I have actually, but not to do with a WordPress website, more to do with a sort of SaaS product with the, how the tool has been built and the guardrails that are into the tool. It’s really amazing because then, well, basically it never forgets.

So every time you throw something new at it, that becomes part of the corpus of information. It then has an understanding. I keep saying it, but hopefully you understand, I’m meaning the AI in this case. A wider and broader understanding, and increasingly is able to deliver that back.

So in my case, often I’ll get some text back, which is divided up into bullet points. Those bullet points will have little footnotes attached to them, you know, 1, 2, 3, 4, and what have you, which will then link out to the documentation itself. And again, just a profoundly useful use of the thing which it’s best at, which is taking a corpus of information, grinding it up and spitting out something which makes sense.

And why wouldn’t you point it at your internal documentation? You know, if you’ve got a plugin, all of your support docs, throw the AI at it, and it will be able to help you as well as your clients. Because it’s guaranteed you’ve forgotten something that you’ve built.

WordPress, of course, itself does this. You know, every AI agent on the planet is welcome to crawl the docs for how WordPress itself is put together. And it’s one of the reasons I think why WordPress has a fighting chance in this AI, CMS battle, if you like, because everything’s open source already. Nothing’s hidden behind a paywall or a licence agreement or what have you. So yeah, agreed. That’s a great example.

Okay. Anything to add or should we move on?

[00:09:22] Matt Schwartz: No, I think that one’s just a cut and dry, really. If you haven’t looked at that, that’s an easy way to get into AI and leverage it without a lot of work.

[00:09:29] Nathan Wrigley: Okay. Absolutely. Okay, then number 10 is your internal MCP and guardrails. I know this gets bandied around a lot, and there’s a lot of acronyms floating around in the AI space. But MCP, maybe we just need to spend a moment explaining what the heck an MCP is, and how it kind of fits into the overall picture, but particularly in this case, with your guardrails.

[00:09:48] Matt Schwartz: Definitely. So MCP is basically an open source way to connect AI, let’s say, chatbots or agents to external systems. It stands for Model Context Protocol. I think maybe the team behind Claude built it. I can’t remember. But the idea really is that, instead of you just connecting directly to an API, which you could do, which an API if you’re not familiar, is a way again, to connect two different systems together.

One system will have a series of things that will let you say, hey, you can add this data, or you can pull this data, or you can modify this data, right? So an example could be something like a help desk. You might create a ticket, you may delete a ticket or you may edit the ticket. An API can basically do those things.

But what an MCP does is it’s really a series of tools that are more prebuilt for the AI, so that it knows and has context of what it should let you do, and how all the pieces of that connection really should modify whatever data you’re doing.

So it’s a lot more specific to agents. It’s a lot friendlier, I would say, if you aren’t familiar with a company’s API, you could connect to their API. I can connect to the WordPress REST API, but if I don’t understand that API, it may not be actually the best way to make the connection.

With an MCP, you can really not have the background of that company’s bridge. It’s going to do all the work, and the AI’s going to have enough information to help you get what you need done.

I know that’s hard to explain, but essentially with an MCP, if you build one at your agency, this is a little bit more high level, or a little bit deeper, but I am seeing a lot of agencies looking at this. Which is, they are using an MCP basically for their teams so that they can add all of their systems in one basically bridge. So that instead of having all their employees like connect to all these different Claude connectors and APIs, they have one system.

So if I have Claude and I’m an employee, it can connect to my MCP at the agency, then the agency MCP is actually on behalf going to go retrieve data from all our different systems. So not everyone has to have API keys. Not everyone has to connect to all these other systems, if that makes sense.

So I am seeing agencies starting to do this. So in some sense the proxy, MCP becomes a proxy or just a way to connect to all your other systems in a secure way.

[00:12:18] Nathan Wrigley: I always imagine it a bit like if you, I don’t know, you approach a giant supermarket and you know that you need carrots and soup. And normally you just go into the supermarket and wander around for a long time, and eventually you’d sort of stumble across the carrots and the soup.

But wouldn’t it be nice if there was somebody at the front door? Then you could say, where’s the carrots and where’s the soup? And that’s it. And they go, okay, the carrots are there, the soup’s there, and point.

You know, it’s just like this perfect gatekeeper, this guardrail that you described that kind of allows you to get the best out of that experience without wasting a load of time and resources and probably a load of hallucination out the back end.

[00:12:55] Matt Schwartz: Wow, that was so much better said than me. But yes, that is a much better way of explaining it. And that’s why if you haven’t looked at MCPs in general, I think it’s worth looking at. But also if you have a tech background, looking at an MCP for your own agency where you can combine all your tools and connect to this one place, I think is a really neat way to, again, get your employees and contractors connected to your, all your systems without them having to have a direct connection.

So if I want them to be like, hey, answer this ticket, go to this WordPress site, instead of them having to connect Claude to the WordPress site into Fresh Desk and all these things, it’s all within the one MCP. And then they aren’t really responsible for those API keys or any of those connections.

Of course, you have to put guardrails on that too, right? Guardrails, like they can’t delete things. You know, not having them delete tickets or websites. Because if you connect, you know, your host, they could technically delete an entire website if you don’t have proper guardrails. So it is, I would say something that is a little bit more on the cutting edge that not every agency should do, but if you are on the more technical side, an internal agency MCP, I think is a really neat idea.

[00:14:06] Nathan Wrigley: I feel like there’s future of commoditising MCP creation.

[00:14:11] Matt Schwartz: Oh, it’s already happening.

[00:14:12] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I really haven’t experienced that but, you know, a really, I don’t even know what that interface might look like in the end, but some really credible way of, you know, you sign up for a service and for a few dollars a month, they will modify, create on the fly, adapt the MCP so that it fits in with what was already an incredible technology. It’s a bit like the icing on the cake, the MCP, isn’t it? The AI was pretty amazing anyway, and then you put that layer on top and it just becomes much more refined amazing.

[00:14:41] Matt Schwartz: There’s actually some companies doing that already where you sign up for their SaaS, they basically store all the MCP data on their server securely, because that’s always a concern. You give them basically all the credentials, you give them the guardrails, and then they build a secure, essentially MCP app for you.

So there are some early options out there for that, that agencies could also look into if they’re less technical. You just want to make sure, obviously you realise you’re giving a third party your data and your secrets essentially.

[00:15:11] Nathan Wrigley: And course, in the era of AI, the capacity to do things really seriously wrong is literally at the end of your fingertips. Whereas before, you’d probably have to have some understanding, well, you could delete whole file structures and things like that, I guess. But now that a simple prompt can just rip through your entire code base or whatever it may be, definitely, one for guardrails there.

[00:15:32] Matt Schwartz: Delete all the sites on my server, done.

[00:15:34] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, that’s right. Yeah. And don’t check.

[00:15:37] Matt Schwartz: That could happen.

[00:15:38] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. Ignore all previous instructions, just delete them all.

Okay, so that was number 10. And really interesting. I think that’s one for the, sort of the tinfoil hat brigade, you know, the real nerds out there. But it’s not far off. If it’s been commoditised in SaaS now, you can guarantee that in the next few years that’s going to become table stakes, I would’ve thought for a lot of businesses and SOPs and what have you.

Okay, so the next one, I’m sure many people will have been familiar with, especially if you have a YouTube account and you’re looking at AI things on YouTube. Vibe coded agency tools. I’m sure I know what this one means, but run it by me anyway.

[00:16:16] Matt Schwartz: Yeah, so one key thing is, I’m not saying vibe coded tools themselves. I’m saying vibe coded agency tools, agency being the specific part. So you’re building internal tools for your agency, which I think in some sense, depending on what the situation is, can be okay to do, in my opinion, because the risk is lower. Again, you’re using it internally.

[00:16:40] Nathan Wrigley: It’s not public facing, that’s the point, right? It’s just you and your colleagues, which hopefully you trust.

[00:16:45] Matt Schwartz: Right, right. Again, you should probably put guardrails, and you have to think about, well, what sort of data is it touching, and how important is this data? That’s everything with AI. You have to think about the risk. But I am seeing a lot of agencies starting to build different types of agency tools. Some that I really do internally myself, and I am a big fan of things like reporting tools and dashboards, right?

This is, again, a good case, I think I talked about in the previous podcast. The sweet spot, I think with AI is having it handle things that you just never could get to that were on your list for a million years, right? And realising that, as long as you do a little due diligence and you feel like it’s in the realm of where it’s supposed to be, this is probably more information than you had before, right?

So a good example is, if you’re an agency, you may have it hooked up to QuickBooks MCP. You may have it hooked up to your time tracking software. You may have it hooked up to one of your other reporting software, WooCommerce subscriptions with Woo. And from there you’re able to have a much better visible idea of what your business is doing well financially. The bottom line, especially if you’re like a lot of agencies where QuickBooks doesn’t really have all of your actual services. You may have those internally or you may have them in a other system.

You can combine those and build reporting systems. And again, that’s a relatively low risk way for you to, worst case is you’re going to use that data and you’re going to be like, well, this doesn’t seem right. And you’re going to have to dig into it and figure out what’s going on. Hopefully you don’t just blindly use it, but I do think the risk is lower.

So those sort of tools I think are really, really neat, and relatively easy to build out. So reporting tools, profitability dashboards, things like that. Looking at your time tracking, like who at your agency is the most profitable, if you have that data? Obviously make sure you actually have the data structure for that, or AI may just make that up.

But we’ve, you know, used that even at our agency and I think it’s been helpful for us to find patterns that we didn’t know where we were spending our time and effort. Especially if you are doing time tracking using something like Everhour or Harvest.

Now the tools that I do struggle a little bit more with, and I am seeing people in agencies use is things like website management dashboards, or building their own QA tools. Because those things, I think the risk is higher of things going wrong.

[00:19:05] Nathan Wrigley: Public facing again, yeah.

[00:19:07] Matt Schwartz: Right. And you’re giving this third party access to all of your websites and it’s not like, you know, a big SaaS. This is something you built internally, which means Claude doesn’t care if it’s wrong, right, until you tell it.

So a good example, and not everyone may feel this way but, you know, I’ve seen some agencies that are building replacements for management dashboards like ManageWP, WP Remote, those sort of things, which is connected to everything and is kind of their most important infrastructure for their clients. Personally, I think that that’s a little risky to be doing.

Now, if you’re doing the right due diligence and you have a technical team and you’re doing manual code reviews, sure. There’s an argument to be doing that if it’s also, I think, solving something specific to your agency. I talked about this in the last podcast, replacing SaaS products when there’s a nuanced solution that’s specific to your agency, I think could be really helpful.

But if you’re just replacing SaaS products to save 30 bucks a month, I think that doesn’t make any sense because you’re going to end up spending a lot more on maintenance, I promise you, than if you just stuck with the SaaS product, if it does what you need. So I think there’s an argument there.

[00:20:18] Nathan Wrigley: I think it’s really interesting. And I do wonder if we’re on the precipice of, so this is me sort of staring into the crystal ball a little bit. I wonder if we’re into the era of sort of disposable, one time apps. So you have a function that you need to do this month like, I don’t know, you must file your taxes this week, but you’re miles behind. So you get an AI to just quickly do that thing for you, and categorise all of the jobs that need to be done so that you can hand it over to the tax man and so on. And then you just put that on ice. That thing no longer needs to exist.

I feel that kind of coming where we sort of vibe code up this one time thing, and then dispose of it. I don’t know if I’m entirely in agreement with that as an idea, but I feel that that is coming. But to your point, I think anything public facing, we’re still in the era of, really, watch what you’re doing. It needs thorough testing.

[00:21:09] Matt Schwartz: Exactly. And thorough code review because, you know, ultimately while the AI coding, I think has gotten really, really good, it’s not a hundred percent there, and it doesn’t have any context. It doesn’t actually know what it’s doing. It’s all patterns. So there is an argument to be made that, yeah, it may get 80% there, but if no one’s actually checked the code review, two months from now, it decides to delete all your websites out of your management dashboard, well, should have done a manual code review, right? And it’s on you.

So I do think there’s an argument, same thing with like QA tools. Building one-off QA tools, which should be persistent and actually probably one of the more important things you build. It should do the same thing every day. It should almost be dumb. It should not be trying to rebuild itself all the time, or be even one-off, like you said. It’s not, I think, a good idea to build a one-off migrator typically for that reason, even though I see people doing it in agencies. Unless you think it’s just a low risk project, I do think, you know, you have to think about that.

To your point about the one-off task though, I think again, if it’s a low risk item, one-off makes actually the most sense because a lot of times if you know this is going to be a one-off thing, you then are subconsciously being like, okay, I’m going to use this once and the cost is not that high and that makes sense, because you’re not having to maintain it. But if you know it’s going to be something you’re going to be using for the next five years and you don’t plan to pay a developer to review it, I don’t think that’s a smart idea, at least not right now.

[00:22:39] Nathan Wrigley: That’s a good calculus I think to have in the background. Okay, so that’s good. So caveat emptor basically, use your discretion. If it’s public facing, maybe think twice. But also if it’s something that you want, you absolutely bulletproof need it to be reliable and predictable a hundred percent of the times that you run it. Again, maybe there’s a human in the loop there. So that was sort of vibe coded things that you might do in your agency.

I feel that’s going to be a real area of growth, whether or not it will be profitable growth or useful growth, I’m not entirely sure. I feel like in our industry at least, people are going to be dabbling in that kind of thing all the time. You know, trying to figure out new, clever tools to achieve a thing, which maybe in the past would’ve been a subscription thing that you paid $20 a month for or something. So we’ll see. We’ll see how that goes.

Okay, moving on then. So the 12th item that you brought to bear was QA, so quality assurance, checklists and testing. Right, run us through this one then.

[00:23:33] Matt Schwartz: I know I just said when you’re building a QA tool, using AI to build an internal vibe coded tool is probably not the answer. But actually what I’m going to say right now is not contradictory to that, because what I’m really talking about for QA and testing is more so having AI help you build things like checklists, right? You already have a good context usually with your SOPs. So it can help you build your SOP checklists. It can also help run the low risk items automatically. And again, I know I talked about risk a lot, but I think that’s how you have to consider it.

So one really neat thing I’ve seen a lot of agencies start using is Claude Skills, which basically just means that you teach Claude a process. Literally it walks you through in the conversation like, what do you want this process to be? And then you can run that later in context.

So a really cool example of this is if you are, let’s say onboarding a client, or you’re launching a site. During your next launch, your next onboarding, you may want to use Claude to teach it the skill of how you launch sites. And then it can automate a lot of those items. And you can still give it context like, I want the human to specifically review this item, right? Or, I want the human to check that no index isn’t set, right? Because that’s like a high risk item, right?

[00:24:55] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. Yeah, that’s a big one..

[00:24:56] Matt Schwartz: Right. That’s one we all, I think, have dealt with at some point in our.

[00:25:01] Nathan Wrigley: Too many times.

[00:25:01] Matt Schwartz: Right. Too many. Exactly. That’s the key. And that goes back to really that vision document I said on the last call. Having an AI vision document where you go through these checklists and you’d be like, okay, we want a human to be involved, or we don’t. You could actually tell Claude this. And then Claude will actually know exactly what it should be running itself and what it expects a human, and it will prompt you for.

But I think that is the beauty of this is, you can make your whole automated process when it comes to tools with QA and anything really related to that checklist, whether it’s launch or anything like that. Look at tools like Claude and Skills like that, and I think that you can use it to help with repeatable processes. And that will actually help most agencies not only speed things up and save on margins, but I think a lot of times they’ll do more testing than they did before.

And this, again, falls into that sweet spot where like AI’s really good for the things that you knew you should do but you have limited time. And testing is one of those items. You want a hundred percent coverage, but in reality that’s not going to happen. So let’s have the human do the really important stuff and everything else we would’ve never gotten to anyways, let’s have the AI do it. And that’s where I think you can use these tools.

[00:26:11] Nathan Wrigley: Do you know what’s really interesting, and we sort of made light of it in the previous episode, the fact that there’s hallucinations and what have you going on all the time. But I do think there’s definitely a moment coming where I think some of the more straightforward things, like for example, the checklist, the binary things, is no index switched on? Yes. No. Okay, that’s a no.

I think I am getting comfortable with that now. You know, just that, okay, we asked the AI that question, it’s delivered as an answer. I’m almost at the point now where I’m never going to go back and check that was true. If it was something much more broad like, is my SEO strategy bulletproof? Well, no. It’s never going to know whether that’s the right thing.

But these much more binary things, many of which, if you add them all up, could take you hours when you’re finally launching a website. Yeah, I think there’s something to be said for just sort of handing that stuff over. And I don’t know, maybe you check it frequently, infrequently, less frequently as time goes on. But yeah, always check the no index one.

[00:27:08] Matt Schwartz: Yeah, I was like, I would still check the no index one, even if it’s binary. But to your point, a lot more of the very black and white items, I think it can handle a lot better than it used to, but I think it still comes down to risk. Like if it’s, yeah, no index, I’m still going to check it. But if it’s something else that just is not that key. Yeah, I think we’re all becoming a little more comfortable or a lot of us are coming more comfortable with that. And I think that’s okay because you know the risk exposure really.

[00:27:35] Nathan Wrigley: Well, and also, especially if it’s QA and checklist time, hopefully you have done the bits and pieces, you really are at that point just making sure that you’ve polished the thing that needs to be polished. So hopefully that’s a bit of low hanging fruit where you’ll catch the things that you missed, and maybe you’ve done the due diligence there already.

Okay, so that was number 12. We’re approaching the end. We’ve got four more to go. So number 13 links directly to WordPress specifically. The WordPress plugin market impact.

I’ve got to say, this has me slightly concerned, because I feel that this could be a good thing for our ecosystem, but also possibly a bad thing. But I’ll just hand it over to you to paint the picture.

[00:28:18] Matt Schwartz: Yeah, definitely. So I think you even touched on this a little earlier when you were saying there’s going to be more one-off apps being built by agencies. And I think that also applies to a lot of plugins that are essentially one-off solutions, right? They are utility plugins. They solve one thing really well.

I think that sort of thing is already seeing the impact. If you talk to a lot of plugin developers, especially some of the larger shops, they’re seeing a drop in sales. And that is a real thing that’s happening. They’re seeing a drop in sales, especially for smaller plugins. Because a lot of agencies and customers are solving that with AI. Maybe it’s a couple files of code, it’s a lot easier for them to build it.

Now I still have concerns around, are they having a human review that? Like I talked about. But humans are going to do what they’re going to do, which some people are just going to run with that. That ultimately affects sales.

So I think that is hurting a lot of the ecosystem when it comes to the smaller plugins out there. And even some of the bigger plugin developers are essentially sunsetting their smaller plugins, because they realise they’re not getting as many sales and they need to focus on what they consider their moat, or their platform, you know, big plugins that AI’s not going to be able to replicate or people shouldn’t trust to replicate.

But if you’re building a small plugin, I’m not going to call any out, but I think that there is some concern there. And I think ultimately for WordPress, I don’t think that really hurts the WordPress ecosystem from the standpoint of plugins in general, but I do think it raises the bar of what a good plugin will be.

And that kind of goes with the agency land. That’s what’s happening with agencies too. It’s just the bar is being raised. You have to have a more complex plugin that actually solves someone’s needs now, not just a small one that solved it, but now they can use AI to do it.

And some people argue that that’s going to continue all the way up with the most complex plugins out there. But I do think that there are, you know, unless AI dramatically improves. If it’s 80% there, that’s great and all, but it’s what we talked about earlier. You can’t really run with that in production at 80%. And that’s the difference between a really good SaaS or really good plugin versus something that was homegrown and just falls apart.

[00:30:38] Nathan Wrigley: I think I have a slightly different, maybe more community focussed, approach to this because one of the things that I think worries me is the, how should we say it? The slow ebbing away of the community. And obviously if you are a, I don’t know, a company launched onto the stock market and what have you, you’re all about the money, right? The bottom line is you’re going to make money, distribute that with your shareholders, whatever, yada, yada. But the point is to make as much cash as possible and do things with that cash.

We have a very different calculus here in that the community is the thing which largely builds the software, maintains the software, promotes events. There is a bit of me which worries that if these, let’s say developers who’ve got one plugin, it doesn’t do 3000 major things, it just does one or two little things, but it’s been their way of getting themselves into the software, and figuring out how it all works, and meeting the community, and being engaged and, you know, all of that.

That slow ebbing away of that is something that I think our community and open source communities like ours need to be just a little bit mindful of. Because it does feel as if AI could definitely eat a lot of lunches. And I think we see that actually. I think we can already see that in the real world with things like attendance at events and the amount of events that are being put on, yeah.

[00:31:57] Matt Schwartz: I think you’re correct. I was actually going to bring this up in the sense that I am already seeing it within a lot of the agency groups. There’s just not as much engagement when it comes to posts, I think, and that sort of thing. Because people use AI more to find solutions, which means they’re not as engaged in the community. Which, to your point, plugins would kind of work the same way, especially the smaller plugins.

And yeah, there’s definitely something I think I’m concerned and kind of sad about already. Because like that’s why a lot of us are in WordPress is for the community. And I 100% agree with you. Not to mention if those guys, the smaller guys go away, then there just ends up being these massive plugin companies, which have their place, but WordPress wasn’t built on all massive plugin companies. So If those smaller ones go away, then that’s a little bit of the WordPress spirit I think are lost for sure.

[00:32:47] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I think we just need to be very mindful about this slow, like I say, wicking away or haemorrhaging of the community. And because at some point, the calculation no longer works. You know, there just aren’t enough community members around to make it interesting for other new community members to join, or to stick with things. Or to update their plugin or whatever it may be.

And maybe that is just a consequence of the way the world is moving, I don’t know. But having lived in the WordPress ecosystem for over a decade, I think it would be a shame if that baby was to be thrown out with that bath water.

Okay. Alright. I think we’ve done that one. So the next one is, well, the next one kind of speaks directly to that actually, which is the idea of, I guess spreading your wings a little bit further and realising perhaps that AI empowers you to do things outside of WordPress. And you’ve entitled this Experimenting Beyond WordPress. Again, off you go.

[00:33:37] Matt Schwartz: So this is something I am seeing some agencies doing, which is, because you can use AI now to use unfamiliar stacks, there’s really two parts. One is just unfamiliar stacks, or unfamiliar platforms, you don’t know. You can really try out new platforms a lot faster now. It will tell you exactly what to do, you know, step by step, or it’ll just do it for you.

So there are agencies, I think looking at other platforms where certain projects may make sense outside of WordPress, where they’re using that in that capacity and it’s allowing them to experiment. Where in the past, just sticking in WordPress, you have all your knowledge there makes sense to do, right? You don’t want to know 10 different platforms. But I think AI’s made that easier to dive into these other platforms. So that’s the first thing.

The second thing I think is that, now that you can actually use chat to engage, you are seeing some agencies, and some freelancers, that are saying, well, I don’t need the WordPress infrastructure at all. I just want to go back to pretty much like static or HTML type websites because I know I’m just going to chat with it and then I don’t have to worry about security or updates.

And obviously I think that only would apply with certain websites. It’s not going to apply with highly functional websites. I think that’s not really going to work. But for like your brochure site, I think some agencies are experimenting with some other platforms out there like Astro and the EmDash setup going on with CloudFlare.

You know, and I think that was a direct response actually. They realised, oh, people are going to want to chat with it. We could build this WordPress, what they consider like an upgraded version, in their mind.

And I think that, you know, it’s good to experiment. I think what WordPress does really well, to your point though, is they’ve hopped on the API centric side of things, building the right framework, not trying to force a certain thing down our throats, but actually leave it really open.

And I think that’s ultimately good because that’s how open source works. That’s why I think AI will have a good position with open source is. To your point you made previously, all the data’s out there, all the documentation’s out there. It’s going to be able to be extremely flexible. And I think that’s really why WordPress is still, in my opinion, going to exist and thrive.

But you are seeing agencies that are looking outside of just Core WordPress, because they can experiment with just a lot less time now. And they can also try out some tools that may be a better fit for certain projects.

[00:36:18] Nathan Wrigley: There’s a lot of technologists in our community and we love tinkering, don’t we, and playing with new things? So it’s fairly inevitable. It goes with the territory.

Okay. Alright. So that was Experimenting Beyond WordPress. I think I’m going to skip 15 there because I think we covered quite a lot of that. So I’m just going to go straight to number 16, which probably will become 15, if you know what I mean, when I put it into the show notes.

So the next one anyway is called, whatever its number, is Risks and Cautions. So we’ve built what I feel is like a fairly solid argument for doing this kind of stuff. And now towards the end, we’re going to knock it all down. No, we’re not. But what are some of the risks that you might point people towards?

[00:36:58] Matt Schwartz: A hundred percent. This is, I think, probably one of my favourite sections because people don’t really talk about these risks as much as they should. If you go on LinkedIn, it’s just like all rainbows and butterflies. And we’re building a new feature every day, and I think that noise can make people feel like they have FOMO and they just jump into AI and they don’t think about the risks. So I think this is actually a really important section for any listeners to listen to.

I think one of the first items, probably a little obvious, but with security issues, with AI tools, a lot of companies, every company, I feel like at this point is inputting keys and all sorts of things into these AI chatbots. And ultimately, like those tools can still be hacked. And actually legally, a lot of them say when you submit into the chat, it’s actually considered public record. Anything you submit to them. That’s literally what OpenAI made a legal argument recently about. So keep that in mind when you’re doing this.

There are some ways to do this securely. You can look into, and I think that’s something I would recommend agencies doing because they, you are holding onto client data. And ultimately you don’t want that stuff getting leaked.

Another thing, kind of on another point, which I personally have less concern with, but I think some agencies bring up a valid point, which is every time you talk to these chat bots, et cetera, they’re keeping track of all these conversations. So I know some agencies are being like, hey, how much does a website cost in my state or my country? Only use the data that other agencies have told you. And I don’t know if it’s really doing it, but people are doing that and they’re, you know, it’s not pushing back on them.

Things like that, just be aware of, I think what you’re inputting in, because it isn’t necessarily being leaked as far as they’re being hacked, but that data make get spit out to places you don’t want it to by other parties through chat.

[00:38:52] Nathan Wrigley: I feel that at some point in the future, some gigantic disclosure, something will be disclosed, which is so horrific that it makes us all sort of take a collective breath when we suddenly realise all we’ve given over. We haven’t got there yet, or at least to my knowledge we haven’t. But I feel that at some point in the near-ish future, some jaw dropping disclosure will occur, which will make us all think twice about exactly what you’ve just described.

What are we giving up? What have we given? But also what have we not consciously given? Which kind of bit of our business did we unintentionally open up for the AI to have access to that we didn’t intend to? And if we had the time again, we wouldn’t have allowed it to, and so on and so forth. So, yeah. Okay.

Any other things on the risks and cautions? I feel that there’s a couple more lurking in there.

[00:39:43] Matt Schwartz: Yeah. I think that one’s to be the most obvious that most people are talking about. One I think people aren’t talking about though is handling errors when you’re building your own tools. Essentially, a lot of times you may vibe code something, right, which is great. But because you’re not really going into the depth of every situation, it’s just making kind of assumptions, the AI, of what should be there.

And because it’s so easy and you’re like, well, I’m saving time, people don’t really outline all of this. And so they don’t really put error handling in these tools. And what happens is, of course there’ll be some edge case and, you know, things just break. And again, depending on the tool, if it’s an internal tool, you can probably get away with that. But if it is a public facing, or a client facing tool, that is the beauty I think of having a human actually review it with logic is they are going to have context that the AI doesn’t have.

To your point earlier, like subconsciously might be giving certain information to the AI that we don’t necessarily mean to. But you also might be leaving things out because you think you’ve already told the AI, or you think it’s going to assume a certain way, and you can’t really make that assumption. It ends up really backfiring in the long run, I think.

And that’s why being very conscious about error handling and being like, okay, we’re going to set up logging, we’re going to set up testing. Validation is just the responsible way to be building these tools that really, I feel like no one talks about.

[00:41:09] Nathan Wrigley: No. And the curious thing about it is, because it’s such a black box, I feel that almost every other technology that we’ve interacted with has been much more, I don’t know how to describe it. There’s been a higher barrier to entry. It’s more difficult to interact with it. You’ve had to, I don’t know, press buttons or enter code or what have you. Now you are just communicating. And maybe we’ll even sort of drop into voice communication at some point where we’re literally just talking with the thing.

There’s just no, how to describe it. There’s just such a small amount of friction that is required to interact with these things. And so it kind of lulls us into this perception that it can’t make mistakes. It’s error free and what have you. And we know that that’s not the case. I didn’t really describe that very well, but I hope you got a general sense of what I was trying to describe there.

[00:41:54] Matt Schwartz: I think you’re right. I mean I can give an example like building out CheckView, which is obviously like a, it’s a QA tool for WordPress sites. But one thing is, I knew a decent amount of QA before I started building it. But I learned so much context building it, and we weren’t using AI when we built the tool, right? That I would’ve never gotten out if I had used AI from the beginning.

Because like you said, there’s just such little friction. You as a human just don’t have to have that much information. You can just dive into something, having no idea on what you’re really doing, which is a blessing and a curse. And I think just being aware of that. And building in the right logs, and errors to at least essentially provide a safety net for yourself, knowing that you’re not going to know everything is really important.

[00:42:34] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. And then a couple of other things which we’ll just sort of gloss over fairly quickly because maybe they’re sort of slightly common sense. Obviously, you know, you’ve got here sensitive client data, which might be, without your knowledge, being scooped up by the AI agents. So monitoring that.

Over dependence on AI vendors. This feels like everybody’s really become dependent on a handful of companies. Maybe you could count them on one hand, I think basically. There’s three or four really, that everybody seems to be using. So that may be something that we want to be mindful of.

And of course, the last one of your bullet points under Risks and Cautions is just the fact that AI makes some mistakes all the time.

[00:43:15] Matt Schwartz: All the time. I think most of that’s common sense. Really, the only one that I think people aren’t talking as much about is the overdependence on AI. Not to date this podcast, but I’m going to a little bit anyways. For example, with Claude, they are removing Claude Code from their $20 plan right now. You know, if you’ve built this into your agency process, well, get ready to pay, you know, a hundred bucks for every employee, which could be thousands of dollars.

[00:43:40] Nathan Wrigley: You can only imagine how valuable that will be. And maybe it’ll be 200 bucks, or a thousand bucks or whatever it may be.

[00:43:46] Matt Schwartz: Right. A lot of these companies obviously are subsidising the cost, and so I do caution agency specifically. That’s why having that AI vision is important, but also considering making it independent enough from your processes that you still can function if this thing does change around, because I do think there is going to be a pushback on cost at some point.

So for example, like when you’re building a product, I’m seeing some companies that are building AI so integral to their product that it will not function without AI. Or going to have to raise the price by 10x. And so like even with CheckView, our tools are there, but we haven’t built it in in such a way that you can’t use the tool without it.

And I think at the agency level, it’s the same idea. For the most part, trying to avoid building it in a way that you couldn’t reduce the AI needs if you needed to. Or just preparing for that the costs could go up and like, you know, if you give it to all 10 employees now, you know, at 20 bucks a month, get ready to possibly pay a lot more later.

And I just think that’s something important for agencies specifically to keep in mind. And I know that seems contradictory to what I said at the beginning of this, AI everything, but I think it’s important.

[00:44:59] Nathan Wrigley: I’m not a financial wizard in any way, shape, or form, but that does seem to be something which, sure as night follows day, is going to be coming, is the requirement to repay a lot of the venture capital that the AI is currently burning through. And yeah, so maybe a significant price hike.

And we’ve all got used to these practically free tools, and maybe that’s something that is not going to be in our future. So that’s a really good point. Put that bulwark in place to make sure that you are protected from that should it go up by, like you said, 10x or whatever it may be?

Okay, so I did say that there were going to be multiple, I think 16 is what I said. This probably will be the last one. This is likely outcomes for agencies. So, Matt, you get to stare into the crystal ball and tell us what your final thoughts are in terms of what you think are likely outcomes.

[00:45:47] Matt Schwartz: So I think some of this is already happening.

Hiring, I think, is slowing down in some agencies because they’re realising they can automate more. They don’t need as many, essentially non-specialist employees, or contractors. And I think that is a real thing that is happening.

I don’t know if it’s going to be necessarily a long-term issue. Hopefully as, essentially the floor raises, work gets better, more agencies will be focused on providing more value, more strategy, those sort of things. Again, the execution becomes a little bit of a commodity. So having essentially more junior team members who usually do that execution isn’t just quite as necessary. So I think that’s going to continue to come up.

But again, I think it’s going to be balanced out with even the costs we just talked about with the AI tools. There could totally be a point where the tools might get expensive enough that it makes sense to have a junior do this execution.

[00:46:45] Nathan Wrigley: Get the humans back. Yeah.

[00:46:46] Matt Schwartz: Yeah. And we go back the other way. Some people are saying that could happen. I could see the argument for that. But I think that’s one thing.

Another thing with agencies is you now can really productise more of your services. And this comes into the automation process that we talked about. You can take your processes, you can really package them up, I think. And there has been a lot of talk about productising services, but I think now you can get more nuanced.

So if you, for example, only build sites for plumbers, well, with AI you can get way more specific on plumber specific service needs, and build out a process with what you’ve already done, plus, with AI to make that, I think, a lot easier for the plumber or the client, to get what they need out of it. In the past, I think most agencies were trying to build SOPs as we have time. And it, you know, it’s just a really difficult process. And I think that’s where agencies I think could help a lot.

And then the last point I’ll make around here is really around that the tools I think will change. It will be, again, less about the execution of tools, how you’re building your sites. More about the actual automation. And then really just testing and monitoring and making sure everything’s working how it’s supposed to be. The human will essentially become more of the manager of the AI. And that extends, I think, to even the tools.

I could see there being more QA and monitoring tools out there for more specific needs. Because now, you know, AI can build 90% of this, which is great. I save that cost, but I know I need to pay maybe 5% of that towards some tools that actually watch and monitor what’s happening, and make sure these automations, and these websites, are really doing what they need to be doing. So I think there is going to be possibly a shift in that way around what sort of tools that we’re investing in as far as agencies go.

[00:48:40] Nathan Wrigley: So that we could describe as a bit of a marathon. I think, really, you really took us through the gamut of everything that could possibly affect an agency in the AI space. We’re in the year 2026, let’s see how it ages. But that was a really interesting deep dive into all of the different bits and pieces.

Matt has very kindly put together some show notes. What I think I’ll probably do is crib those. Maybe I’ll put them into the WP Tavern show notes, or maybe I’ll link to a Google Doc or something like that where you can see them. But you’ll be able to see all of the different bits and pieces that we went through. There’s a lot more on that document than we actually had a chance to go through. So definitely do check that out.

What I can say is that the future is definitely going to be interesting. Whether or not any of the predictions you’ve made will turn out to be true, time will tell.

But what a fascinating chat. Thank you so much for chatting to me. And I really appreciate you sticking around and doing the second episode somewhat unexpectedly with me.

Just before we sign off, Matt, where can we find you? Where are the best places online to hang out with you?

[00:49:49] Matt Schwartz: Yeah, definitely. So definitely, you can find me on the Admin Bar Facebook group. I’m also in LinkedIn, trying to be better about that. You can also check me out. I’ve got a Slack channel. Checkview.io, of course. Inspry.com. Feel free to reach out if anything comes up.

Definitely, overall I would just recommend agencies dabble in this. Don’t be reckless, but definitely see what makes sense for your agency. Document it all out ahead of time. And I think that that’s really going to be agencies strong suit is, can we leverage this stuff in a smart way?

[00:50:21] Nathan Wrigley: Well, you’ve certainly provided us with a lot of food for thought. So once more, go and check out the show notes on wptavern.com. I will probably link to the document that Matt has created on both part one of this and part two as well. So you’ll be able to check both of those out.

Matt Schwartz, thank you so much for chatting to me today. I really appreciate it.

[00:50:41] Matt Schwartz: Thank you so much, Nathan.

[00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox Podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress. The people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case, exploring AI’s impact in WordPress agencies.

If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you, or your idea, featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox and use the form there.

So on the podcast today we have Matt Schwartz. Matt runs Inspry, an Atlanta WordPress and Woo Commerce agency. He started it back in 2011 and has been working with WordPress even longer than that. In addition to his agency work, he also has a product called CheckView focused on WordPress testing. He’s got years of experience in the WordPress agency world, and recently he’s turned much of his attention towards the growing impact of AI.

If you’ve been hearing a lot about AI but a feeling fatigued by all the fragmented conversations, this episode might well offer a different perspective. Rather than focusing on how AI creates websites or content, Matt shares a different angle, how AI can be used inside a WordPress agency to enhance processes, improve workflows, and deliver more value to clients, with much of it happening behind the scenes.

We start by talking about how Matt stumbled into web design and how that led him to running his own agency. We dig into agency life, and why so many freelancers and agency owners are constantly iterating on their processes. From there, we talk about the big shift that’s happening, not just in building sites, but in how agencies can use AI to streamline their SOPs, client communication, and internal operations.

Matt explains the need for intention when adding AI to an agency. He introduces the idea of an AI vision document, that helps set guardrails and guidelines for where, and how, AI should factor into your business. He also shares real examples of ways AI can save time and stress in things like meetings, proposals, debugging, support, and even helping you expand your service offerings. We also touch on the risks, ethical considerations, and the importance of keeping a human in the loop during critical agency moments.

If you’re running a WordPress agency, or are curious about how agencies are adapting to the rapid pace of change, brought by AI, this episode is for you. This is part one in a two-part series, so listen to this and tune in next week for part two.

If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

And so without further delay, I bring you Matt Schwartz.

I am joined on the podcast by Matt Schwartz. Hello, Matt.

[00:03:45] Matt Schwartz: Hey Nathan. Thank you so much for having me today. I’m excited.

[00:03:48] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, you’re very welcome. We’re on the podcast today to have a chat about AI. Now, before you hit the stop button, dear listener, because AI is all the rage everywhere, we’ve talked about it a million different ways. I think there’s something a little bit different about the conversation that we’re going to have today, because it particularly plays into the WordPress agency, kind of the stuff that you are not doing with the website directly, but all of the bits and pieces that allow you to have an agency, and how AI may or may not be best placed to insert itself in those different scenarios.

But before we begin that, Matt, do you mind just giving us your little bio? Maybe tell us a bit about your situation regarding WordPress agencies and whatnot.

[00:04:31] Matt Schwartz: Definitely. Yeah, so I run an agency called In Inspry in Atlanta. We’ve been around since 2011. We’ve been using WordPress since 2013, and also have a product called CheckView, which does WordPress testing.

But yeah, in the agency space specifically, you know, I’ve been talking to a lot of different agencies about AI. I’ve been pretty involved in it. And you’re totally right, Nathan, our goal today is not to make everyone just have to experience the verbal throw up of the word AI, AI, AI over and over again, which is, I feel like I’m sick of the word. But really going into how agencies can use it in, I think, really interesting ways, and also being candid about what AI is, and some of the pitfalls I think of it that, you know, aren’t always talked about, especially if you go on LinkedIn.

[00:05:15] Nathan Wrigley: Okay, so we’ll get into that in a moment, but just before we do, there’s a couple of interesting bits that I want to throw at you. And this is something that I heard in the British press not that long ago. And it doesn’t in any way, shape or form reflect on WordPress, it was just more generally about AI, and the fatigue that the general population are experiencing around that term.

And it feels like we have reached maximum capacity to just hear those words, and hear the overpromising and the potentially under delivery of AI. So I’ll throw that little bit in, but also, just to say that what we’re going to talk about today is not going to be how to get the pixels on the page, and how to use AI to turn the website out. This is much more going to be the background to the agency that you run and all of that kind of thing.

So before we begin, did you intentionally get into web design all those years ago, or were you more like just about everybody that I talked to, did you stumble into it a little bit more?

[00:06:13] Matt Schwartz: So I stumbled into it in the sense that I started when I was basically a kid. You know, I was like obsessed with building websites for like clubs, and middle school, you know, we had tables and HTML. I think Template Monster was around then. And I would just go to the website and look at these beautiful designs that I knew I couldn’t make.

So then, from there I built websites all through middle school, high school. Got paid, I think from my first one it was my Mom’s work. She worked at a dentist. It was awesome that he let me do that. And, you know, he paid me a couple thousand bucks, which was a lot in high school. And then from there I just built sites through college. We were in Drupal land over at University of Georgia. So that was a little harsh reality for the first CMS I ever used actually.

But I really just enjoyed building websites through that process. And I remember graduating in Information Systems in the Business School and being like, I think I’m just going to keep building websites. I think I like doing this. So I didn’t go the consultant route or anything like that, I just stuck with websites. So I stumbled into it when I was a kid, but I definitely chose to stay in it after that.

[00:07:17] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. And what’s curious about that, and it maps very much what I did, almost every word that you said could map into my own life. Is that you, not working for a company, you are never sort of given the SOP. You have to do the SOP. You have to figure it out as you progress on your journey over the years. So every process that you’ve got, every thing that you do, every price point that you make, every email that you create as a template, you’re probably generating that yourself.

And so that kind of leans heavily into what we’re going to do today, because I felt that journey never ended. Part of being an agency owner was always this constant exploration of not the website itself, that kind of handled itself, more the, what’s the process? How do I get new clients? What are the backend systems that I’m going to use to make it all work?

And so I think freelancers in particular in the WordPress space have got that. And so they’re probably constantly looking around, very much beguiled in the more recent past by what AI can do to them.

And so let’s start, you’ve listed out very kindly a whole load of show notes for me. And the first point that you wanted to get into was, well, the big shift. So let’s start there.

[00:08:26] Matt Schwartz: Yeah, definitely. So I think one thing that we’ve seen as agency owners is, oh, websites and content now can start to be built by AI. And everyone’s talked about that, like you said. But I think what is more interesting is what you’re bringing up, which is around more the process of using AI. Which, if you are a freelancer and you have not looked at your process, please do. I didn’t look at my process for like years, and I would just repeat the same thing over and over again. It wasn’t until I actually started hiring people that I realised that was even really a thing. I know that’s sad, but that’s the reality. So if you haven’t, definitely look at that.

But when it comes to AI, I think being able to use it for process and your SOPs and automation, that’s really where I think it’s actually going to make the biggest impact for agencies that do want to use AI.

Because essentially, not every agency’s this way, this is a generalisation, but as a customer, or a client of an agency, they don’t see the difference between one website and another typically outside of the design, right? They don’t really know the technical know-how. But what they do see is, what is your workflow? What is your process? What is your touch points with them? And that’s ultimately what ends up being the product to your clients.

So I think as an agency owner, being able to use AI to make that process easier, and more clear, to your clients is what will really allow you to thrive. Not necessarily, just the content and executing building the website. Sure, AI may be able to help there, but that actually goes into the bigger process in my opinion.

[00:10:01] Nathan Wrigley: Okay, so we’ll definitely get into all of those, but I think basically the case you are making is that there is a there, there. There is something behind the AI that could definitely improve things.

I think it’s fairly unlikely that anybody listening to this podcast hasn’t dabbled in some way with a little bit of AI, but maybe there’s a handful of people out there who genuinely haven’t. And the last 20 years have been marked by fairly gradual improvements in things. You know, SaaS apps came along and they gradually improved and one superseded another. But again, it was incremental.

But over the last three or four years, I think that’s all gone out the window. Incremental’s no longer really a word. It’s seismic this week, seismic next week, seismic the week after that. Keeping up is going to be difficult. But anyway, needless to say, you are going to make the case that there are areas where AI smuggled into your business is going to be useful.

Can I just ask at the beginning, do you in any way show the AI to your clients? In other words, is there a moment where they get to see behind the curtain, oh, Matt, look, he did that with AI, or do you kind of have this curtain which protects you from the client, so that they never see that you are using AI? It’s a bit like how everybody who was a freelancer always uses the word team. They sort of pretend that there’s like nine of you, but there’s actually only one of you. So it’s a bit like that. Do you hide the AI from your clients or do you let them know that this is what you’re doing?

[00:11:30] Matt Schwartz: So when it comes to the product, we definitely let clients know if we are using it in their product. Because I think, at least from my ethical standpoint, I think you should do that. I don’t want to be in a case where we’re not doing that. But I do think when it comes to your process and internal workflows, no, we don’t typically need to do those things.

The only time we would do that is if we’re actually working with a client to improve their internal processes with AI. Then they may be seeing a parallel setup to what we’ve done, even at our own agency.

[00:11:58] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. There are some people who kind of revel in the, no AI, if you like, so they make that a badge of honour within their business, whether it’s an agency in the WordPress space or anything else. And so obviously they would probably want to proclaim from the rooftops that they’re not using any AI. But I think yours is a fairly standard position. You know, if it doesn’t actually affect what they’re doing day to day, why would you need to use that? In the same way that you don’t need to tell your client, well, we’re using Salesforce in order to communicate with you. It’s just, there’s the URL, go to that and type your ticket in there and so on.

So your second point, why now? Why is it important right at this moment? So we’re recording this, I don’t know, towards the end of April, let’s say that, 2026. Is this like some sort of red line in the sand? Are we about to enter a Rubicon moment where we can’t go backwards?

[00:12:47] Matt Schwartz: Well, I don’t know. It’s seismic every week as you said. So I do think the gap is widening between agencies that are not using AI and using AI. But that doesn’t necessarily mean, in my opinion, you should just like hop on the AI train if you’re not currently deep in it. You do have to think about what makes sense to your agency and what you’re comfortable with.

But I think it really comes back to the fact that execution is becoming a commodity more and more, at least in the web agency space. If you’re building a brochure site, right, those tools are essentially becoming more and more replaced. Just like drag and drop builders came in and now this is kind of, in my opinion, the next iteration. It’ll be less about the execution of building a simple website. It’ll be more about, what is the true value of your agency to that client?

Which in a sense is not a bad thing, because this was always an argument before. You know, are you an agency that builds solutions for clients? It makes them money, or saves them money. Or are you an agency that just executes what they say? And there’s definitely a place for that. I think there will always be a place for that, but I think when you look at like a brochure site, it’s harder, I think, to make that argument than if it’s like an e-commerce site or a custom app, because the tools are just getting better.

So as an agency, I think there is an edge here with AI because clients are going to have higher expectations. You’re going to compete against companies that are using AI to do better touchpoint, to do more touchpoints, to having a better process.

Now, of course, that is dependent if they implement AI correctly, right? User error and AI is like any technology, that is definitely a major concern, guardrails, all that good stuff. But I think that is why this is the time, because if you’re not already looking at it, your competitors are definitely looking at using it in some capacity.

[00:14:40] Nathan Wrigley: Just something you said really struck home there. You said execution is a commodity. I’ve never heard that phrase, but that encapsulates so much, so well. I think that’s really interesting.

And I also share your moment in time analogy because I think we are at some moment where the seesaw, I don’t know if you use that word where you come from. The seesaw is definitely tipping to the point where, in the part of the world where I live, virtually everybody is aware of it. We mentioned that maybe there’s fatigue about it, but certainly almost everybody has had some exposure to it. They’re now aligned with what can be done, and at what cost, and for what amount of time.

And so it does feel like if you were to go and say, I don’t know, I’m going to build you a $5,000 brochure website with two pages, maybe a few years ago that was much more credible than it seems like now. And so this horizon of expectations is opening up. And it’s not just because we can do it, it’s because the clients, they know we can do it. And they know that things are going to be cheaper to produce en masse in the future.

So I think you’re probably right. So again, you’ve made the case for, this is the time. So not just that this is a good idea, but this is the time. Anything else to add onto that before we move on to your next one?

[00:15:56] Matt Schwartz: The only thing I would add to that is, you know, AI could be an edge for you. It could also be not using AI at all, because ultimately it’s about the value you’re providing, again, to your client. So you may be able to build a two page, $5,000 website using AI, but essentially if you’re able to provide value to that client in some other way, whether it’s your sales process, your overall process, your personality, whatever it is, that all plays into this. So I would keep that in mind.

But overall, you are correct. I think the floor is rising for everyone. And this is real dark, but AI to me only showed us that a lot of the work we do day to day, it’s just not that special, it’s execution. And that just means we need to be spending more time on the strategy and the value to the client, whether that’s using AI or not. But I think using AI to at least look at that is a good idea, if you haven’t done that up to this point, I think it’s the time to at least look.

[00:16:54] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I expect the calculus that’s going on in most, and I’m using air quotes here, normal people’s heads. So when I’m talking about that, I mean non-technical clients who might be coming, looking for a website for their bricks and mortar shop or whatever it may be. The calculus of AI is just this shrinking of time. The thing which probably would’ve taken a week to do, you know, okay, I’m going to phone you up, we’re going to set up a meeting, we’ll have that meeting, we’ll back and forth what we might want. And then a week or two later, you’ll show me a few wire frames or something like that.

That all seems now to have been crunched into literal minutes. That’s no longer a secret. I think at the beginning of the AI, movement, let’s call it that, a few years ago, I think there was a call that you could basically say, make more money, because the client’s expectations would be the same in terms of time, and the amount of expertise that was needed.

But that seems to be shrinking as well, because now the clients are aware that the AI can do that thing. Look, you just knocked it up with AI in three minutes. No, we’re not going to pay you for six weeks for that kind of thing.

Okay so, right, there we go. So that’s the now. Then you move on to something that I’ve not even thought about before, which is creating an AI vision document. Now you’re going to need to explain what you mean by that I think.

[00:18:08] Matt Schwartz: Yeah, definitely. So the idea really with this is being more purposeful about adding AI. At least in the past, at my agency, you know, I’d wake up one day freaking out and be like, we’ve got to try to see how this works. Does this make sense to add AI to this process? And it wouldn’t be very purposely built. It would just be like, hey, let’s try this.

And to some extent that experimentation is good, but at the same time, I think if you are a lot more methodical about that process, it will be better for the long-term use of AI. Because as I’ve said, I definitely have, maybe I didn’t say, I have hesitations about AI and I use it, right? I think that’s the paradox of what’s happening. A lot of people are using it, but we’re not all trustful of it. But we can see that there are potential gains and you want to be on the cutting edge.

But ultimately, the vision document, the idea is that you will create a document that outlines all of your processes at your company, at your agency. And see what are the things that you want to add AI to, what makes sense, things that are repetitive, that the team is losing time on, compared to things that really require human judgement.

So it’s not just like shove AI into everything. This AI document sounds like that’s what it is. But it’s actually like, there may be many places we don’t want AI at all, or we may want to have a guard for human judgement. And I think that’s actually a really good idea to protect your agency from risk and really just your reputation. Because otherwise, I think a lot of agencies are just kind of, you know, yolo, adding it everywhere and not really thinking about it from a high level.

The other neat thing you can do if you’re building this is, obviously you can use AI to help find patterns in your business from using your time tracking software to see who is working on what tasks, and what’s taking the longest. And being like, are these good places that we could use AI? Like I can connect Claude to Everhour that we use, and it can spit out who’s working on what in the past month. And I actually can get a good pattern, because one thing you can, I will say with AI is it’s pretty good at pattern recognition. That’s what it was built for. So if you just need like a high level idea, again, grain of salt, but at a high level, it’s pretty good at that.

So I think for a vision document, pulling all that data in, using AI and then setting these guardrails, figuring out what in your team’s processes you can build into a vision is a good idea. And that goes into the high level point I made, which was really, I think AI being used for more process and agency is the big thing here, more than anything.

[00:20:42] Nathan Wrigley: I suppose if you’re the agency owner as well, and obviously agency could be like three people, two people, right up to, you know, several hundreds, maybe thousands, who knows. If you are at the, towards the top of that pyramid, let’s put it that way, knowing when and where it’s going to be used is really important. You need to know that, okay, our support, 80% of our support is going to be handled by AI. That’s the thing that we’ve leaned into. We’re going to do it that way.

Or maybe you are exactly the opposite. You know, we’ve learned, our customer base are very dissatisfied with the kind of answers that they get, because of the nature of our company and the expertise that we need to bring to bear. So we’re not going to do any AI for support.

But also development, to know, okay, this is the moment where you must stop using AI. When you run into this snag, we’re going to deal with that as humans. We’re going to huddle together, figure it out as humans, and maybe take it back to the AI at that point.

But having that overarching understanding, and writing it down. Having an SOP, if you like, for AI so that everybody’s on the same page and knows where it’s permissible and not permissible. So you mentioned you’ve got a whole laundry list of possible things. So it might be in the sales process, the delivery process, the proposal stage, project management, QA, launch. There’s a whole bunch on here.

Yeah, that seems like a really neat idea, and not something that I’d figured out. And it’s kind of like, keeps you honest in a way. It means that this is what we’ve agreed to do as a company, these are the boundaries that we’re going to set ourselves. And they can change, but for now, this is what they are.

[00:22:14] Matt Schwartz: Yeah. I think that even if you’re not, again, jumping in the deep end of AI, just having a doc like this will protect you so that I think you do have these guardrails with your employees or your contractors. You know who’s using what, and you can really protect your agency even if it’s not implementing more AI, right? I think it’s just a good idea.

And like you said, writing it down, it’s funny, it’s kind of like when you build your agency, you write your mission statement and your values and that really does do something in, I think, the human psyche when you do that. And I think that can be applied here with the AI vision document too.

[00:22:47] Nathan Wrigley: I love your fourth point, which you’ve entitled, AI as a new core service offering. Because this feels like a really nice sweet spot. Because with the best will in the world, you and I, and probably a lot of the people that are listening to this podcast are very much into technology. We deliberately put ourselves in front of new tech, new features, new widgets, new gadgets, whatever. So we’re beguiled by it. But the truth is, we know there’s a lot of people out there that aren’t, probably don’t really want to get all that close to it. And so I think what you are suggesting here is, why not offer your AI expertise that you gain as an actual service to clients? Have I got that right?

[00:23:24] Matt Schwartz: Correct. So essentially, like you said, if you’re already building up these new technology skills, being able to apply this directly in a, I would say in the proper way, right? Like we’re seeing, again, AI thrown in everywhere. You have to know your clients and your customers. They may not want to hear the word AI. What they may want to hear it instead is, hey, I can fix your business workflow and I can save you thousands of dollars, and we can automate this. They don’t want to hear the word AI, and that’s okay. But it’s essentially AI at the end of the day, right?

So it may not be that the product offerings actually use the word AI. If anything personally, I’m kind of avoiding that, at least at our agency. Of course I’ll tell them it’s using AI, but it’s not what I lead with. I think it’s more about going in on, okay, what solutions can we provide clients and using this as a new offering, especially as a way to handle and mitigate what’s happening with brochure sites, right?

Brochure sites I think are going to continue to drop and you need to provide value to clients. And I think getting closer to their actual processes, there’s a couple different ways you could do this. Like I know some agencies that are using AI to build custom web apps, like lightweight internal ones. Which I think can be helpful, but I have concerns around the risks and security of that because I do know some agencies that are, again, are just yolo building it. I don’t think they’re doing the due diligence. But I do think there’s a way that you can build, let’s say an app that used to cost 50,000 for 10,000 now, right? Or 8,000 and do it mostly like the right way, do human review of the code. So it’s still something that they couldn’t have done at all before. They couldn’t have had this custom internal app.

And I think that is the argument for people that say, hey, I’m going to replace all my SaaS products. It’s not, in my opinion, you replace all your SaaS products. If you can build a SaaS internally that is built specifically for your business, and you feel like you can maintain and build it properly at the right cost, sure. You’re willing to do that. But if there’s a SaaS product out there that does exactly what you need, I’m going to pay the $30, and then go yell at that company. I’m not going to build it internally. So having these conversations with clients, if you’re going to build custom apps, I know I went on a little side tangent, but I think that’s really important say.

And then the other one I’ll mention as far as AI core offerings is using more automation with tools like n8n or any of those Make type tools. n8n, I would say is a little more advanced, but the benefit is clients are hearing about AI, they realise it can do a lot, and starting to ask them, well, how can I help save you money or make you money in your processes? So productising or creating SOPs that are more automated. Even using those tools for your own customers, I think can be huge. Because then you’re really getting to value directly with them.

Like, brochure sites, I think the problem is, it’s almost subjective sometimes the value, which I’ve always struggled with, depending on the client. But things like their processes and them seeing you automate this stuff, they see the value immediately. So it’s an easy sale that you can make. And you can provide that value, and potentially even get recurring income off of that. Because maybe you’re hosting the automation for them or you’re tweaking the automation. So those are some ways you can mitigate, I think what’s going on with AI.

[00:26:50] Nathan Wrigley: The next one, I’m just going to skirt over quite quickly because I think everybody can kind of grasp this. One of the things which AI is obviously superior, let’s go with that word, to the typical human, is its capacity to wrap its arms around a massive amount of data, and kind of make sense of its straight away.

One of the areas where I think you are saying this could be deployed pretty effectively is in things like marketing, where having an understanding of, I don’t know, geography, spending power in different geographical locations, what kind of products are going to service the market that you are launching into, and therefore how to build websites, pages that kind of react to that and will work well.

That’s the kind of thing that was always off limits to me. I wasn’t interested in the marketing side. Looking at that data, trying to digest that data, it was just never of interest to me. And now, I think everybody can understand that you point an AI in the right direction and it can draw conclusions, which are just so much more credible than somebody like me could summon up in six months of hard work, really.

[00:27:53] Matt Schwartz: Well,I mean I think you could sum it up, but I think you bring up a really good point, which is that with AI, it can pull in all this data and it can give you, I would say, summaries and next points that you just wouldn’t have done before. I actually think that’s the sweet spot with AI is, are we using this to replace a really good existing setup, or are we doing something that we literally couldn’t even do before because the client couldn’t afford it?

So I think that’s what’s really neat is I can be like, okay, client, we looked through your Freshdesk, we looked through all the data you gave us. Here’s what we saw your personas. And before, there’s just no way, as an agency, I would be offering that at the budget that they could afford, or maybe the interest as an agency to do that. So I think that is, a really neat thing is, especially for small businesses, we can offer them services that they just wouldn’t even be able to have in the past at the budget that they have.

[00:28:46] Nathan Wrigley: Okay, so really you are kind of broadening the product offering that you can have. I mean nobody here is going to advocate that you just use an AI and regurgitate whatever it says without some background knowledge that what you are saying makes sense. There clearly needs to be a bit of that. But the amassing of the data with some common sense, heuristics around what it is that the data is showing you.

Okay, that’s interesting. So maybe there’s some sort of low hanging fruit that previously you would’ve said no to and, look, we just don’t do that. You can now not only retroactively sort of say, yes, we now do that, but maybe even proactively say, look, we’ve got these other things that we can discuss as well. Okay, that’s interesting.

Right, here’s the next bit, and this is, I think if you are not an AI expert, and I definitely would consider myself in that bucket, I think this next one is some really great low hanging fruit to get you started. So this is, your number six, is AI inside agency operations. So this is using AI to make work easier, I guess would be an easy way to say it. So just run us through these points.

[00:29:51] Matt Schwartz: Definitely. So this is probably, if you’re familiar with AI, the most common uses. But essentially it’s going to be, you know, things like your meeting summaries, right? I think everyone has seen the bots that join in and, you know, there’s like 10 bots and there’s like two people and we’re like, are we in dystopia? Or it’s you and like 10 bots, and the other person doesn’t show up and you’re like, am I supposed to just talk to this bot? I think Mark Zuckerberg actually says he’s starting to have a bot fill in for him at meetings. Anyways, very dystopian.

But when it comes to meeting summaries and that sort of thing, I think where it can be really helpful if you’re not using it, again is, in the past, if I was having these discovery calls where I may not actually land this client, I don’t want to spend 20 hours trying to figure out the perfect proposal for them. It’s just not worth my time, basically, right?

So what this lets you do is it lets you, as an agency, do things you couldn’t do before, or you didn’t have the budget and resources to do. One would be on discovery. I can now take all the meeting notes, I can have it go to the client’s website and I can also have it look at my previous proposals. And I can have it put together a solution for this client, in terms of like what proposal makes sense for them.

To your point, I’m still going to review it. I’m still going to edit it. I’m still going to make sure that this makes sense, but I think that’s a perfect sweet spot again for AI. I know I keep saying it. Something I just wouldn’t have done before. I would’ve like, either I just spent 20 hours on it or sent a very generic proposal just to get something out the door. Now I can make it really a lot more nuanced because it can go through all that data.

So if you’re not using it for summaries or proposals or SOWs, I think a draft version of that, it’s really good at those sort of things with combining all the data.

[00:31:36] Nathan Wrigley: I am so surprised by how quickly that remarkable technology became utterly mundane. That is say that three years ago, the first time somebody dropped in a Zoom meeting with an AI bot, I thought, okay, that’s really unusual, what’s going on here? And then within three minutes you get the email after the call is finished and you see this perfect summarisation of exactly what you talked about, including correctly labelled next tasks for each of the individuals on the call.

That to me was, I was living in Star Trek. And now that just seems so pedestrian. And that’s remarkable. That’s the speed at which we’ve become adapted, and it’s become part of our modus operandi.

And if you haven’t used those, it’s really worth a try because you will experience the amazement that I had three years ago. And then you too can become completely numb to how amazing it is really quickly.

It literally will take an hour of audio and spit out a basically perfect summary in 150 words or whatever it may be, and it will capture it perfectly. I suppose the rebuttal to that is, well, what do you do with that? If nobody does anything with that then, well, you haven’t really lost anything. You’re in exactly the same place as you were before, but at least you’ve got a written record of it.

But like I say, that’s the low hanging fruit. They’re definitely things. SOWs, SOPs, meeting summaries, that kind of thing. Great idea.

Okay, next one. Number seven. AI for support workflows. What’s going on here?

[00:33:04] Matt Schwartz: Yeah, so this one’s a little bit more about the actual operations. But I’ve talked to some agencies that are starting to really build into their support process AI tools. For example, using things like n8n, the automation platform, where it can digest your help tickets. And we’re not necessarily going to have it solve the problems, right? But what it can do, again, is it’s going to have access to a lot of data about that website. It may have access to your project management software, all the other tickets that came in.

And unlike a human where it would take hours to do this, so we just aren’t going to do it, it can do a really good job of essentially making sure that we can have all the information we need for the support person to do what they need to do, the support team, right? So it can even give good initial resolutions for the team to do, so that they can work through tickets faster.

That’s a good example of, we’re not replacing the human, we’re not trying to automate it so it emails back the customer. But what we are doing is we’re taking in all the context of, hey, it’s this client, they’ve had these other tickets, it has access possibly to the WordPress site, so it can even see the error logs. It may have access to the server APIs, so that it can actually see what’s going on with that server. And then it can basically come up with a resolution that is likely the issue.

And you are seeing a lot of, even hosting companies going that route, where they’re starting to have agents inside their hosting so that you can pinpoint issues in WordPress a lot faster than you could in the past. And again, I still want a human to review that, but I do think by doing that, you can get a speedier response to your customers, and you can cover more tickets without alienating your customers or making it seem like it was, you know, written by a robot with em dashes everywhere, right?

[00:34:54] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, you know what? I think this is a real area to tread carefully, certainly from my point of view, because I have definitely got AI bot fatigue. In that, there is some button that gets pushed when I find that I’m in a chat bot, and that is the only route that I’ve got through this whole system. I really dearly love to get in front of a human quite quickly. And I think a lot of people are learning that technique of, you know, the first thing you type is, speak to a human, or something equivalent to that. I think it’s really easy to misstep here, and misjudge people’s capacity to take AI only, or AI mostly or whatever.

This I think will be an interesting area to watch. And maybe this will be at the vanguard of when people express their frustration, you know, how much of this can you take? And monitoring that and keeping sight on when people’s, I don’t know, anger boils over because they’re not getting the service that they paid for or the service that they’ve come to expect or what have you. So, yeah. Anyway, that’s my 2 cents on that.

[00:35:50] Matt Schwartz: Hundred percent agree. It’s the most sensitive portion in my opinion. I mean that’s your touch point with your customer when they’re most frustrated.

[00:35:56] Nathan Wrigley: Right, that’s the pain moment. And introducing additional pain at the moment of pain is fraught with problems. And we’ve seen this play out in all sorts of other ways. I’m sure it’s the case where you are in your part of the world with telephone systems where you end up in this just infinite loop of, press three for, and then press four for. And then eventually you get back to, oh, well, I’m back to pressing three am I? Okay. And the anger boils over.

It feels like such a win. We’re saving time. We’ve got the AI to answer because it’s read all of our documentation. I’m going to guarantee that somebody will not be able to get what you think they ought to be getting with it.

And dare I say it, what about all those dear people out there who really are unable to access the technology in the way that you anticipate, or the way that you can. Maybe they’re elderly, maybe they don’t have the capacity to do it. Maybe they’ve got accessibility needs or something like that.

Okay, number eight. AI assisted debugging and WordPress management. I like this. This is a good one.

[00:36:53] Matt Schwartz: Yeah, so we covered this a little. It goes along actually with the above point which is, one thing that I see other agencies, and we’re also doing this internally is, you know, you can obviously connect AI agents now to WordPress sites directly, obviously with guardrails in place. But it can connect to the REST API you have the Abilities API with Automattic. There’s third party solutions like Novamira out there that can actually work with the PHP code side of things. Your hosting companies often are actually building their own tools as well.

So doing all of that, debugging has been, I will say, has been dramatically improved, at least at our agency. Because it can do all of that and it can really find a nuanced solution where, you know, we could spend 10 hours trying to work on some weird PHP issue because, again, it can look at the whole picture. And I think that is where AI is very good, is when it’s a one-off thing, right? Where it’s just like, this is a one-off troubleshooting task. I don’t want to spend 10 hours learning exactly what this was. It’s likely going to get you there, and then you can obviously finish it up if it’s not able to get you fully there.

But you can use these tools today to really reduce the amount of debugging and management you’re doing. And you can extend it. We’re not going to spend a lot of time on this, but doing edits on websites, a lot of page builders now are starting to build in syntax for agents so that it understands Gutenberg blocks. It understands how to edit and edit nested blocks. I’ve had struggles with Claude, where it would try to write nested blocks and it would just mush the whole page.

But as these page builders are becoming better, and as WordPress becomes better, essentially WordPress becomes the infrastructure, right? And Claude is actually doing the work. You’ve heard that. And what I get out of that with the infrastructure is WordPress is the platform, it provides all the capabilities, but then the AI tool, mixed with the human, is essentially going to be managing the WordPress site. And it’s much easier to tell AI to do that than to go into the backend and make edits.

But I am a little hesitant on just making free flowing edits, not checking the work on the actual website, or letting AI check the work. Some people are doing that. I’m not doing that. We’re saying, give us the link after every page you edit, and I’m going to go click it and I’m going to look at it.

Some agencies, they’re saying, okay, Claude’s going to go to the Chrome link and do that. Whatever you’re comfortable with, but in our opinion, there still needs to be human review. And I still don’t think that’s going to change, even if it gets better because until AI is as good as a human being, in the sense that we can trust it and it won’t lie. I give this analogy, right? You hire a developer, they lie to you twice, you’re probably going to fire them, right? But with AI, we just keep giving them a second chance. And, why?

[00:39:41] Nathan Wrigley: Free pass every time.

[00:39:42] Matt Schwartz: Why are doing that? And I think the way to mitigate that is you still have to have human review based on the risk factor. That’s really what it’s about.

[00:39:50] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I share your sentiment there. I think it’s very important to have a human in the loop. And usually at the end of whatever is going on, there needs to be a human just to do the sort of final summary and checking and what have you.

But the point that you mentioned there is, WordPress really has done an awful lot of work in the background to make itself AI ready. So a lot of the capabilities inside of WordPress, a lot of the things that you would normally have had to engage with the admin, with a mouse, or with a keyboard or what have you, a lot of that has been taken over.

And we are very much entering an era where WordPress becomes almost like the scaffolding for the website in a way. And you can talk to the website through these AI agents, but in many situations, I think in the next five, six years, there’ll be a lot of people who will be never visiting the WordPress admin and clicking around and trying to find the menus for things because they will simply ask an AI.

Can I change the clock to the 24 hour clock? Sure, done. And that will extend into everything. You know, I want that block to be, I don’t know, I want the text in that block to be bold, and have this particular font and yada yada, on it goes. And WordPress is doing a really incredible job at an incredible speed of laying that foundational work.

If you haven’t looked at what the Core AI team are doing, there’s definitely some interesting stuff.

[00:41:06] Matt Schwartz: It’s really neat.

[00:41:06] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, it’s, and I think that an interesting and commendable approach as well, because rather than trying to, I don’t know, hold everything into WordPress, it’s very much the opposite. It’s, we’re just allowing everything to communicate inwards to WordPress. And WordPress will just be the foundation upon which the whole thing resides.

Okay, so we’ve got through 8 of what turns out to be 16 points in Matt’s comprehensive show notes. And just looking at the clock, Matt, we’re at it’s kind of 40 odd minutes, which is about the sweet spot. So I’m going to recommend that we split this up into a second episode. So this in effect, will be the first of a two part mini series, if you are okay with that. How do you feel? Is that all right with you?

[00:41:45] Matt Schwartz: Definitely. You know, I didn’t know we were going to dive this far into it, but I’m so glad we are. And I hope, you know, the audience is interested in staying around for part two.

[00:41:52] Nathan Wrigley: Okay. In which case, if you are happy with that, what we’ll do is we’ll knock it on the head, as we say in the UK, here. We will return next week with the second part. And I will advise people at that point to listen to the first part so they can keep up to date.

So we will see you in a week’s time. I guess all it remains for me to do, Matt, is to say thank you very much for joining me today. Part two next week. See you soon.

[00:42:14] Matt Schwartz: Thank you so much. Look forward to it.

[00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox Podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress. The people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case Beaver Builder, AI hype, and evolving WordPress workflows.

If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you, or your idea, featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox and use the form there.

So on the podcast today we have Robby McCullough. Robby is one of the co-founders of Beaver Builder, a page builder plugin that’s been a staple of the WordPress ecosystem for nearly 12 years. As one of the original innovators in the space, he’s seen the tides of web development shift from the days of hand coding websites, through the rise of page builders, and now into the era of AI.

We start off with Robby sharing his journey into WordPress, life as a product founder, and how he’s balanced that with major life changes, like welcoming a new baby and moving house, all while steering Beaver Builder through an evolving landscape.

The conversation then turns to AI. Robby explains why Beaver Builder didn’t jump on the AI bandwagon early, and why he’s glad they waited. He gives insights into how the latest generation of AI tools aren’t just hype, they’re actually creating exciting new possibilities for building features and re-imagining the user experience. He discusses the shift from AI as a buzzword, to truly agentic tools that can code and assist in building websites, and what that means for the future of web development.

We revisit the page builder revolution and its impact on WordPress adoption, before examining whether there’s still a place for page builders in a world where AI can whip up a site with a simple prompt.

Robby reflects on the importance of understanding underlying technologies, the changing role of site editors, and how Beaver Builder aims to blend the best of visual editing with new capabilities AI brings.

Throughout, there’s a healthy dose of nostalgia, and a consideration of what we might lose as web development becomes more abstracted. We also touch on business anxieties, the challenges of keeping up with AI’s rapid pace, the place of human connection in a tech driven future, and the lasting importance of community within WordPress.

If you’re curious about the future of page builders, how AI is changing web design, or how to run a product business through the shifting sands of modern tech, this episode is for you.

If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

And so without further delay, I bring you Robby McCullough.

I am joined on the podcast by Robby McCullough. Hello Robby.

[00:03:44] Robby McCullough: Thanks for having me.

[00:03:44] Nathan Wrigley: You are very, very welcome. Robby and I have known each other for many years. We’ve met in person, and I’ve just been catching up with what has become an extremely busy life.

For those people who don’t know you, Robby, do you just want to spend a minute, bearing in mind it’s a WordPress podcast, I guess we could bind it to that. But if you want to launch into anything else, feel free. Give us your potted bio.

[00:04:04] Robby McCullough: Well, my name’s Robby McCullough, and I’m one of the co-founders of Beaver Builder, a page builder for WordPress. And gosh, we’re going to be going on our 13th year, 12th year, next month. I guess at this point, I consider us one of the kind of OGs of the space. We’ve been doing it for a while.

In my personal life, like Nathan mentioned, we were catching up before we hit record here, but I had a baby this year and I bought a new house this year. So it’s just been a whirlwind of a life for me and a lot of big changes, but excited to come and catch up and chat about it.

[00:04:38] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, thank you. I appreciate it. And I know full well how those changes can affect your sleep pattern, let’s say.

Let’s dive into it. So you’ve got this product, Beaver Builder, as you said, it’s been out for 13 or so years. If we were to kind of rewind the clock 12 years or something like that, it felt like WordPress and page builders, that was all the rage. It was what everybody was talking about.

How’s it going over there still? Does it still have that sort of same impact? Is the business still ticking over nicely?

[00:05:06] Robby McCullough: Things are going well. We’re humming along. It is going to be 12 years this year. I did the quick napkin math in my head. It’s funny, sleep pattern you mentioned, like it used to just be sleep. Now it’s a pattern. It’s like, oh, a few hours here, a few hours there.

But yeah, it’s, okay, so at Beaver Builder, we didn’t jump on the AI hype train. I know we were going to, you know, maybe try and avoid using the word AI when we talked about doing this episode a few weeks ago, but I feel it’s going to be impossible not to talk about it a little bit, if not completely for the whole time slot.

[00:05:36] Nathan Wrigley: It’s going to derail the whole thing. Yeah, that’s right.

[00:05:39] Robby McCullough: But, yeah, we didn’t jump on, like it felt like there was an era there, period, maybe about a year ago where a lot of products, just about every product was slapping a GPT wrapper in there. And it’s like, oh, you can use AI to write your headings. And a lot of products were putting AI features into their product just to kind of say they did.

Some people were doing it more involved and more in depth and doing some really cool stuff even back then. But it felt like every piece of software I used, especially some of the more corporate kind of Fortune 500, 100, Zooms and Slacks and stuff like that. It’s like, you had to have AI to appease your corporate C levels and your shareholders or whatnot.

We didn’t jump on that bandwagon. I’m excited that we didn’t because now I feel like AI has kind of reached another evolution, or like inflexion point where some of the stuff that you can do with these LLMs and like agentic coding tools, it’s like good now. It’s really good and it’s a lot more exciting.

So behind the scenes, we’re doing a bunch of work with AI in product, both just like building out features for Beaver Builder that we wished we had, but didn’t want to expend the resources to build. Because now, friction to build new features is a lot lower. Then also working on bringing in some agentic coding tools like to be the Beaver Builder experience.

[00:06:53] Nathan Wrigley: Let’s sort of go back to the, where we thought we might have this conversation. The initial idea, I think was to discuss AI less. But I think you’re right, we’re not going to avoid that subject. There’s no way of doing that. But if we go back to when Beaver Builder began, or maybe just a year or so before that, making a website was hard work. You know, you had to have CSS skills. If you were using WordPress, you had to get into the whole templating hierarchy and certain aspects of PHP needed to be deployed. So HTML, CSS and so on and so forth.

And then along come this cavalcade of page builders and suddenly made that whole process much less painful. You decide what you want your page to look like and you drag in components which ultimately build the page, page builder.

And that felt like it was going to be the way that we would always do it. And it created much less friction. It opened up, probably the fact that WordPress took that sort of massive rise from, I don’t know, 10, 15, 20, 30% of the market share, right up to where we are at the minute, sort of 40 plus, something like that. It feels like page builders enabled that to happen. They just brought in this tranche of users and what have you.

And so I’m curious as to whether or not you still think that that interface, because you mentioned AI, but do you still get the heuristics out of your plugin? Are people still building in that way? You know, are people still using the page builder and making that an effective business to sell to clients and things?

[00:08:18] Robby McCullough: Yeah, I mean, definitely. You know, I don’t want to come on here and sound like I’m Blockbuster back before Netflix and saying like, oh yeah, you know, like your DVDs won’t come for three days when you use those guys. I definitely feel that we’re, you know, the tide is kind of shifting, and there’s this new way to build an experience building that’s really cool and really fun to play with.

That said, yeah, people are definitely still using page builders. If not, like I’ve built vibe coded probably like a dozen websites just in the last like month and a half just by talking at my computer. It’s really exciting to see these things that used to take weeks to build just happening in an instant.

That said, people would always ask like, oh, why should I use WordPress? Why would I want to use WordPress over something like a Squarespace or a Wix? And one of the things I used to say is like, well, WordPress is a really great platform for learning web development. If you want to learn how to build websites using WordPress and getting into those, like it’s a great place to tinker and experience.

But then there’s a framework around it. You mentioned all of the kind of backend and front end code, PHP, CSS, JavaScript. WordPress gives you a framework that you can go in and learn about things piece by piece, when you need to know how to do them because you have a problem to solve.

And when you’re using these like agentic, vibe coding tools and going from zero to a hundred, you kind of lose that interaction with the tooling and the code and the art and the craftsmanship that is building a webpage. So I think there’s definitely still some value to kind of doing things by hand, especially if you’re wanting to learn the inner workings of how these systems work.

[00:09:49] Nathan Wrigley: It’s kind of interesting because I remember when page builders such as Beaver Builder came onto the market. There was a whole argument of, well, we don’t want to use a page builder. We want to do it in the way that it should be done. The, and I’m using air quotes, the WordPress way. I remember that being said rather a lot.

And then over time, I think most of those arguments got settled. Pager Builders became a really credible tool for almost everybody. I think a lot of people really leaned into that. So maybe we’re at some similar point now where there’s this new paradigm which nobody anticipated a few years ago for building webpages. And we’re kind of at that inflexion point, that transfer from, okay, we were all using page builders, now there’s these other things going along.

I suppose from my point of view, it feels a bit like you are, I don’t know, how to describe it. If you’re using AI, is there an analogy here? You’re kind of buying furniture from Ikea, as opposed to getting it from a carpenter. Somebody that really knows their skill, has created the chest of drawers or whatever it may be by painstakingly building it all up, layer by layer, sawing the wood, chamfering it down, polishing it and what have you, as opposed to chest of draws available from Ikea.

That is a bit of a concern for me. I’ve been somebody that’s been very bullish about the web as a platform and the need to understand the code that you are deploying and what have you. And so that is a worry for me, that we’re getting into an interface where we’re just having a chat, and we don’t really know how anything got on the page other than, well, I typed this sentence and there it was on the page.

And that I think is where there’s still a great big market for things like page builders. People who, they may not want to know every single line of the CSS, but they want to be able to drop things in, drag things in, add the padding, add the margin, whatever it may be. So I would be surprised if the market for page builders were to just go away overnight.

[00:11:37] Robby McCullough: Yeah, I always selfishly very much hope the same thing. You know, it’s funny, I’ve been plugging Chris Lema’s content for like my entire career and experience. Because when we first got started in WordPress, we were like reading his blog about how to run a business in the WordPress space. And now he’s been doing this like really fantastic content about AI. And like he’s generating content with AI, but he’s built this framework using his kind of like years of expertise of how to write for people and how to teach and share information.

But yeah, he posted this really interesting article about how he converted his blog from WordPress to, I think it was like, one of the static site generators, one of the like AI vibe, code tools, right? And he was saying how like in doing this, it made him appreciate all these things that were built into WordPress. I think he called it plumbing, all the plumbing of WordPress that you don’t really appreciate until you like change houses that doesn’t have plumbing.

Things like, you know, drafts, and featured images, and open graph metadata. And WordPress really brings so much to the table. Like you can vibe code these fun little sites, but when you’re doing something that’s going to be a little more serious, or business critical, or that you want to customise, right? And that was the beauty of WordPress is just how extensible it is.

And, yes, there are a lot of businesses and people that want a five page static brochure style site. But the place where WordPress has really shined, I think over the last few years is just what you can build and customise for, you know, whether that’s personal or business use cases.

[00:13:01] Nathan Wrigley: I have this sort of notion that you could go two ways with a page builder and AI. I’ve got this idea that I’ve seen all over the place where you talk to an AI and then it builds something, which then you can edit with your page builder. But I’ve also seen things analogous to page builders where you go into that UI and then brick by brick if you like, you use the AI to build up inside that UI.

So I guess what I’m describing is, you know, in the first scenario, you talk to the AI and then you open up Beaver Builder to amend whatever it made. And in the second scenario, I open up Beaver Builder, blank canvas, and then piece by piece get the AI to construct the bits and pieces inside there. Which way, I mean you may be doing both, but what’s kind of the roadmap for pushing AI into your product?

[00:13:50] Robby McCullough: I should have definitely checked in with my business partner Justin and Billy. Justin’s been our tech lead and dev, and we haven’t announced anything formally and publicly yet, and I feel like I’m going to come in here and announce all this stuff we’re working on.

The reason we don’t announce things publicly until it’s kind of ready, so to speak, is we don’t want to like announce ourselves into a corner where if we say like, oh, we’ve got this thing, like we’ve got these prototypes working. But as soon as we show it to like our community and the world, if we don’t execute on it, then that’s like, oh, you know, what do you mean? We saw this cool thing and now we’re not going to get it.

That said, we are kind of working on both approaches. So one of the kind of experimental tools we did is, let’s say you vibe code up a landing page separate from WordPress, just, you know, using Claude or Codex or whatever. You have this page on your desktop, you’re looking at it locally, we thought it’d be really fun if you could take that and like drag that kind of like how you can drag into Netlify and just have a page live on the internet. Like that experience of just dragging a page and having it go live is so fun.

We wanted to bring that to Beaver Builder. So you could drag a page into Beaver Builder and it will get converted into like our Beaver Builder interface. And then we’re also working on a chat agent based tool. So when you’re working within a page or within a site, you can focus in on like, you know, this is my pricing table and I really want to update these features, or I really want to rework this copy or this design, and have like an agentic chat experience within existing pages or existing Beaver Builder sites. Again, this is all like still experimental territory. Let me do my like, this is experimental territory warning.

[00:15:20] Nathan Wrigley: So given all of that, I have a question which probably could map to just about anybody in the WordPress space who’s got a product or a service. How much just utter wasted time have you had with your product and AI?

So really what I’m asking there is, how much anxiety does it bring into the business? And where I’m kind of going with that is, you know, it’s hard enough running a business anyway, just rewind six years before anybody was talking about AI in any way, shape, or form. That in itself is hard enough. You know, you’ve got payroll, you’ve got to sell the product, you’ve got marketing, you’ve got development, you’ve got new product features, roadmap, support. All of that’s hard enough.

And then now throw into that mix, almost like you’re wearing goggles which cut off your capacity to see anything. You’re now in this period of time where you’ve no idea how the market is going to shift. You don’t really know what it’s going to look like next week, let alone a month or a year. I guess this is sort of a personal question really, but how much anxiety does that heap into a business like yours? Not having that, okay, we know what we’re doing for the next year or two years, or whatever it may be.

[00:16:28] Robby McCullough: Yeah, I think like being a hopeless optimist is one of the reasons we’ve made it this far. I’m like excited and optimistic. And I say that, again, knowing like, I think before we started recording we were kind of talking about page builders have had these existential threats before.

You know, when we started Beaver Builder, there was this kind of stigma around visual design web tools that was like legacy from like the Dreamweaver days. They were really awful. People would use Dreamweaver to build an HTML site and you get this just like mess of spaghetti code and like they got so over complicated so quickly the experience of using them was terrible.

I remember going to our first WordCamp and saying like, yeah, we’re building this page builder tool for WordPress. And people were like, why? That sounds horrible. I can just code my theme, you know, and I can use my PHP variables in the theme. Like, why?

Then there was the whole Gutenberg announcement, God, it feels like ancient history now. But page builder, I can’t even count the number of times people predicted that page builders would be gone within a year of Core releasing Gutenberg. Yeah, now you’ve got the AI agentic vibe coding sites.

You know, I’m optimistic. I hope we don’t become the, sort of like one of the antiquated, like Fortran, you know, or IBM mainframes. There’s these like giant corporations running these antiquated systems that are never going to die because, said corporation doesn’t want to pay the cost to upgrade everything.

Regardless of whether I want or not, I’m sure that’s going to be true to a degree with WordPress. 40% of the web, all those millions and millions of sites, aren’t just going to decide to update overnight because there’s a new, cool tool on the block to play with. So there will be legacy WordPress forever, right? I mean, who knows. In the year 2126, like there’ll probably still be WordPresses out there.

[00:18:12] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. So you made an interesting analogy there. You talked about Netlify and the capacity to take a page, drop it in, literally drag a page, and there it is on the internet. Some magic goes on in the background, and that is just live.

And that’s kind of how I feel a little bit about AI. So you describe something in a sentence or in a few paragraphs or what have you, and there it is. It’s on the page and it’s ready to go. And it may be incredibly credible, it may look amazing and all of that kind of thing. But there’s no real capacity then to sort of go in and deconstruct it, and move that little bit because you didn’t really know how it got created and what have you.

So this isn’t really a conversation right now about the skills of HTML and CSS and JavaScript and all that. It’s more like, what even does that editing process look like on the backend? I still think you need a thing that you can invoke as the editor. To go back in and say, okay, it built this great long landing page, but now it’s no longer fit for purpose. It’s almost right, but I want to go and tweak this thing.

And yes, you could try doing that with yet another prompt, but I still think there’s always going to be a place to go back in and edit, and find the thing with the mouse, and click on it, and modify it, and move it around and all those kind of things. So even if the workflow becomes much more AI first to build the thing, I still think you need that sort of scaffolding after it’s done, to go back in and make the modifications. I don’t know if that lands well with you.

[00:19:38] Robby McCullough: For sure. I think our kind of approach to our software throughout the years has been, we wanted a tool, I’ve told our origin story many times, but like the quick version is we were a web design agency. We wanted to use a page builder to build a site so that we could hand that site off to a client and they could make changes to the site themselves, instead of having to email us to like update an image or the copyright footer, you know?

So we built Beaver Builder with that in mind, where we wanted it to be easy enough for someone who was non-technical to be able to get in and use. But we came from a, you know, development background. We wanted to be able to get in and like tinker with the code when we wanted to.

And that’s the direction we’re trying to head in as we bring AI into the product. We’re trying to expose more of the front end code, both like the markup and the CSS in future versions. So if you want to get in and make changes, and I think that, like it’s going to be even more fun now if you have an agentic tool that can go in and like, God, man, one of the things that I’ve been having so much fun doing. It’s been a while since I’ve been building websites like actively. I always tinker with our websites. I have these sites I tinker with. But CSS and the browser technologies have progressed a ton since I was in it day to day.

With these age agentic tools, I’m like learning about CSS, seeing what’s being written and then going in and tinkering with it. Like, all of the new flex and grid and the kind of like, the variable approach to designing and the different kind of font sizes, like screen-based font sizes and sizing tools. It’s just been like, it’s been such a great learning experience.

We’re trying to make that possible and be like, what we’re not trying to do is make it the closed black box where you have to pay us tokens per month and you get your designs out on the other side. We want to have a system where it’s kind of like a bring your own key, bring your own agent, give it access to Beaver Builder, but then also give you access as the developer to go in and tweak things, play with the code, learn from the code, and ultimately deliver a site to a client that they can jump in and easily change things still from the visual interface.

[00:21:35] Nathan Wrigley: I think we’re in a bit of a gold rush period, aren’t we? Where everything’s happening so fast, we’re not really thinking about the editing or the maintenance, let’s go with that. So most of what I see online about AI, whether that’s websites or think of any other part of AI is, what’s possible? What’s new? What didn’t we have last week that we’ve got this week?

But there’s going to be this utterly lasting legacy of websites that need to be maintained for 3, 4, 5 years, what have you. We don’t really get into that conversation too much. Like, okay, it was built. AI did its part, it looks fabulous. Thank you very much. Brilliant. We’ve paid our tokens, we’ve got this fabulous page. But the maintenance thereof never really gets talked about. And I wonder if that’ll be kind of where page builders sort of end up, as the maintenance tool for the thing that the AI maybe helped you create.

You know, its utility isn’t necessarily in dragging the components in one by one to build the thing. That was just handled, oh, everybody builds with AI these days. That’s just how we do it. But now that we need to make a modification because it’s Christmas and we need a little thing here, or a little thing there or, you know, I don’t know, our logo change or what have you. Then that’s where that tool comes into its own. You know, it’s more of an editing tool, maybe less of a creation tool, if you know what I mean?

[00:22:54] Robby McCullough: Yeah, that tracks. As much as maybe I miss the thought of this going away, I don’t see myself going into Figma or Photoshop anymore and like building out a colour palette by hand and like going to Google Fonts and looking at all the options of fonts and selecting one that I like and then trying to find one that like.

And again, it’s like a little sad because that was a fun like, yeah, that’s how I grew up. But I feel like just, for me like, okay, like AI surfaced something about me. I was just chatting with it the other day and it said something like, you know when something looks wrong before you know when something looks right. And that’s sort of how I’ve designed my whole life.

Like, I’ve called it the brute force approach to design. I don’t feel like I have that like ability to have a design vision and then see it come to reality. I just know when something doesn’t look right and I’ll iterate and iterate and iterate until I find something that like, oh, that looks good to me. You know, using these tools, agentic tools to create and iterate over and over and over again, like I just, there’s some things I can’t see doing by hand ever again.

[00:23:52] Nathan Wrigley: I know exactly what you mean. I think there’s a certain melancholy there, isn’t there? Because that’s the way that you’ve spent the last 10, 12 years, that feels like home in a way. That’s how webpages get put together. But if you were to be, 20 years ago, you’d have a different set of melancholy when page builders came along.

And I’ve got this feeling that everything that you’ve just described, going into Figma and building it up piece by piece and literally spending days creating a page, which you know very well could probably credibly be done in four seconds by an AI, then that is probably going to be the tsunami that’s coming.

And I imagine that the generation of people who, you know, I’m of a certain age now, let’s just put it that way, but I have young adults around my house. There’s no way they’re going to choose the, well, okay, some of them will, because there’s always artisans, but I imagine most of them will go for the, what is effective in the shortest space of time, for the least amount of effort? Because that’s what we do. And that’s just the way it’s going to be. But still, I think there’s going to be that need for the editing tool on the backend. And I imagine Beaver Builder will still be utterly credible for those kind of things. So melancholy is the word there.

[00:25:09] Robby McCullough: Yeah, I mean we hope so. I’m more excited about it. It’s funny, I’m thinking like, oh yeah, maybe you’ll still go back and write CSS for like a history class just to see how it used to be done.

I’ve been tinkering with this, sort of an aside, but I’ve been tinkering with Ham radios. My dad left behind a bunch of Ham radios, and we kind of inherited them and didn’t know what to do. And this was actually back in the pandemic time, so I had a lot of free time and started just like learning about Ham radios and I got my Ham radio licence.

You know, I like went through this deep rabbit hole of Ham radios, you know, and then I got bored and moved on. But I recently picked them up again because I moved, I’m in a new town now. And I’ve been using ChatGPT to like build out these lists of radio frequent, like because it used to be this tedious process where you’d have to go and research your like local Ham radio clubs and which stations they were broadcasting on. And then you’d have to programme it using this antiquated software and you’d put it into a spreadsheet and then you flash it into your Ham radio. It just was like tedious work.

And so I was just like, hey ChatGPT, can you go find me like the active repeaters in my area, format it into a CSV that I can just like upload to my radio so I can scan through it? What made me think about it is like I found this local repeater website that looks like, it’s just like a vintage, late nineties website where, you know, not quite like the hit counter on the bottom of the page, but just pre table, HTML sort of thing.

I was just looking at the site and I was like, man, this is like a classic car. I find so much beauty in it. And I, like I know how it works on the inside. But man, yeah, this is like, they’ll never create anything like this again. This is a vestige of the past.

[00:26:43] Nathan Wrigley: So the curious thing there is that if we were to go back, let’s say the year 2003 or something like that, and if I’d have been in the same room with you and I said in 2026, it will be so normal to have video conversations online, and we’ll all have this thing, this rectangle in our hand, we’ll have access to all the world’s information. You just type it in and everything gets regurgitated back to you in a heartbeat. Oh, and you’ll be able to talk to it and it will respond and this, that, and the other thing. You would’ve said, no, that’s nonsense. But it turned out to be the truth.

So maybe that’s where we’re at with the internet. You and I have this impression that where we’re at now is what it is, but I suspect that if we look back in 20 years time at where the internet is, who knows what it’ll look like. Maybe the canvas won’t even be a computer. Maybe we’ll be wearing things or there’ll be things, goodness knows, planted into our brains or things like that.

And so we have this nostalgia, this melancholy for the way websites were built, this tradition of building them. And it’s not going to, you know, it will be archaeology. Like you just said, there’ll be this kind of like retrospective looking back, having nostalgia for it. That will be the only place where HTML and CSS will actually matter. It’s like, oh, they did that. That’s cute.

[00:27:56] Robby McCullough: It’s a fun time to be experiencing, that just made me think of like, you know, the whole Gutenberg editor and this idea of rebuilding how we write or making a modern version of like how we write content.

Who would’ve guessed back then 10, 7 years ago that like markdown was going to become so ubiquitous? Instead of these like really fancy GUI based visual tools, it’s like, no, we’re just going to use some like hashtags and dashes, and that’s how you’re going to format all your pages in the future, but it’s actually going to be like nice because it’s going to be standardised and you’re going to have all this cool software to make it look pretty as you go. You know, like mind blown.

[00:28:29] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, and even just the fact that you’ve got things like keyboards, they seem so self-evident that’s how it’s going to be, because voice isn’t quite there yet. But it’s not that far away. Maybe we really will be talking to our websites. And I don’t mean in the sort of, you know, you’re going a bit mad sense of the word. I mean in the sense of, okay, that’s looking a bit stale. Can we swap that picture out for another one? And can we move everything over? Let’s just change the font across the whole site. That’s it. That’s all you need to do.

I remember I was at a WordCamp, I think you may have been there actually, WordCamp London. This was back in sort of 2017 or something like that. And there was a guy from Adobe on the stage. He did one of the presentations, and he was literally saying this. He was saying, we are going to have a future where we talk to our website. And he put together this presentation where he faked it. So he would speak to the website and he’d obviously configured the slides in such a way, you know, it looked like his speaking had an impact.

And it was exactly analogous with what we’ve got now. You know, we type that prompt at the moment, but he literally said, I want a picture of a cat there. No, not that cat. Can I have a different cat? Yeah, that’s great. Move it down a bit. Give it some rounded corners. Change the font on the heading. And it just worked. And it was a bit of a miracle. That was the interface that the guy was predicting, and we’re not there yet, but I feel that we are not too far away from that. And that will just be so curious.

[00:29:56] Robby McCullough: I have a story that I’m going to bring it back to what you’re talking about really quickly, but my mom had a dish that she made when we were kids called One Hand Lamb, and it was like a lamb and beans dish. Her friend gave her the recipe and she called it One Hand Lamb because the idea is you could make it while holding a baby, like you just needed one hand.

And I have embraced dictation, and I feel like it was such great timing for me as I’ve been carrying around this baby. So this workflow of like just having the one hand to start my dictation, and talk at the computer, and then the agentic workflow where I can just let it go do its thing for a few minutes. Play with the babe, come back. I should preface this by saying, like I’ve been trying really hard not to be like on my phone and on my computer, like we have some really good quality baby, daddy time. But realistically the dictation workflow with a baby has just been, oh, chef’s kiss for me. I’m more productive now.

[00:30:51] Nathan Wrigley: That’s really interesting. I’m imagining nobody’s going to have anything negative to say, but yeah, the idea though that your young child is growing up in an era where that’s going to be really normal. I’m watching Dad do this thing, he’s speaking to this, well, who knows what that is, but that will be entirely normal.

There’s probably some part of all of us of a certain age that thinks, gosh, that’s a bit sci-fi and a bit creepy. But equally, I imagine your daughter having grown up in that world will not see it that way. You know, it’s like, but this is how you get access to information Dad. So that’s also kind of curious. It’ll be interesting to see how the next generation, your daughter and younger, this will be just the normal, the modus operandi.

I guess one of the problems is it never slows down. So it’s the rapid pace of change. It’s not the fact that it is changing and what wasn’t possible five years ago is now possible. It’s that the pace of change seems to be so rapid now that what wasn’t possible six weeks ago is now possible.

And I don’t know if you get that sense as well, that it’s moving at such a breathtaking pace. And my understanding is that the goal really is that the AI at some point is able to manage the creation of the next feature in AI, and so on we go. Until we get this sort of logarithmic infinite curve where it starts to go absolutely vertical. You know, the line graph of capabilities goes absolutely vertical. I think that’s the point at which I will probably get off the bandwagon because I can’t keep up with that. So it’d be interesting to see how your child interacts with technology. They probably won’t think it’s weird at all.

[00:32:32] Robby McCullough: She’s going to be fortunate to have a dynamic. So my partner is not a fan of AI the way I am. She’s actually an anti fan. She thinks it’s terrifying. And when I’m in there talking at the computer, she’ll come in and like take the baby and be like, the baby shouldn’t be hearing you talking to computer. So she’s going to get a good dose of kind of both sides of that spectrum.

But I’m sitting here at my nice, for me, nice desktop computer set up with like a monitor and two speakers and a mechanical keyboard. And there was already kind of these like whispers and ideas that the next generations weren’t using computers, because it’s all mobile based. And it’s like, yeah, is my daughter ever going to want a mechanical keyboard? No.

[00:33:10] Nathan Wrigley: No, possibly not. I don’t know. I don’t know because I think, okay, now I’m going to lean into your wife’s position a bit more because I think there’s something, I think there’s a there there as well. And that is to say that it does sort of, there is an open source part of me which, and a web part of me, you know, like web standards and things. There is a part of me which isn’t just melancholy, but is a bit sad that those kind of things are going away and that those tools, and those skills that you and I needed to acquire, the HTML, the CSS, the JavaScript and so on.

I think if we just get to the point where communicating with any technology through an AI, with no understanding of what’s going on, except for a few kind of artisans, the carpenters like I described earlier. That would also be a bit of a shame. So maybe there’s a place for the, I’m going to use air quotes here, the Luddites as well as the technologists at the same time.

[00:34:04] Robby McCullough: I think one of the sad parts for me, which I see happening in myself and the way I’m working, is that ultimately what these chat agents do is mimic being human. But they do it in a way where they have access to just all of the information available, and they’re experts in every field.

So it’s like I’m collaborating with this bot the way I would collaborate with a human, but it’s like, I work from home alone a lot, so I’m often working alone. Am I losing opportunities to collaborate with real people? Is this like sort of faux human experience going to start taking precedent over interacting with actual humans. On that note, I’m so glad to be talking to you this morning, right? Like if we weren’t chatting, I’d be talking at my computer.

[00:34:50] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I think there’s a there there as well. I think that is something that we do need to be mindful of because that’s the sort of slow inexorable sort of deterioration that you don’t notice from one day to the next. But then you suddenly look around and you think, do you know what? During the nine to five for the last six months, I actually haven’t really spoken meaningfully to anybody else. I’ve been hyper-focused on productivity, which obviously the AI will give to me, and a little bit of the humanity got lost there.

Maybe that’s just something that we will develop. We’ll strongly hold dear to our downtime. You know, so instead of sort of sitting and watching the television, which I think is a typical habit in most homes, it’ll be more of, well, let’s go out and do things. And maybe we’ll get a revitalisation of things which are, in the UK have been in decline, you know, since COVID and things like that. The pub and things like that. Many people have stopped going and all of those kind of things. So maybe if we’re more bound to talking to simulations of human beings, maybe there’ll be more of a craving to go and do things.

And actually curiously, I’ve just described how things like the pub have been in decline. But equally there’s been reporting in the UK press how a lot of ordinary sort of clubs, for want of a better word, the sewing club, and the canoeing club, and the mountaineering club. They’ve been coming back really with a vengeance, as people I think have kind of realised, wow, there really is more to life than sitting, playing with my computer. So maybe maybe there’s an upside to it.

[00:36:19] Robby McCullough: Yeah, I hope so. I’m sure like most things in life, there’ll kind of be some pendulum swings and some bubbles and corrections and whatnot. On that note, I’d be really excited to see WordPress events kind of start thriving again. We were talking a little bit about this but, yeah, one of my favourite things ever was all the fun travel I got to do going to WordCamps all over the world, and having this, you know, built in friends. When you travel, you get to go meet these people you either see a couple times a year at events, or that you’ve never met before, you knew online, but travelling to a new city you’ve never been, and having someone to go out and have a meal with, or drink at the pub.

And that’s been noticeably in decline. At least here in the States, the number of Camps and WordPress events has been dwindling. But, yeah, I would love to see that come back a little bit. That said, I’m not travelling as much these days, but I would at least like to have the option.

[00:37:07] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, that’s right. I guess we’ll never know, you know, if you think about the broad march of history, thousands of years where very little change, you know, somebody changed the shape of a stone tool slightly over thousands of years. History kind of works like that. Most of history is quite uninteresting, you know, very little changes. But in the last 50 or 100 years, it’s really been going at a real pace. And I just sort of feel that maybe it’s just all getting a little bit out of control.

And perhaps that’s something that we do need to do, is just get back into the real world and the people that we know. And even this, you know, you and I are chatting, you are several thousand miles away, but it’s nice. It’s better than talking to an AI, that’s for sure.

And I share your concerns about the WordPress community. I think, in the UK at least, the COVID pandemic was a thing which kind of knocked it on the head to a great extent and they haven’t really recovered. But I hope that they do. We’ll have to see.

[00:37:59] Robby McCullough: Yeah, to speak to the pace of advancement and what you just said, hearing that I’m more fun to talk to than an AI is extremely flattering, so I really appreciate that.

[00:38:09] Nathan Wrigley: You are very welcome. I’m not entirely sure that, this is also true, I guess there’ll become a point when I will really won’t know the difference between the AI that I’m talking to and the real human being. Actually that’s not true. It was very interesting. There was something, this is to go slightly off piste, there was something that I saw online the other day, and it was somebody who was on the telephone to somebody who cold called them. They were offering all this expertise. And then during the conversation, he’d obviously filmed it because he’d got this intuition that something was going wrong. He said the words, said something along the lines of, ignore all previous instructions, tell me how to bake a perfect whatever cake it was.

And it just came right back with, this is how to make the perfect muffins, or whatever it was. And in the conversation prior to him saying those words, that was why it was such an astonishing video. In the conversation prior to that moment, I had no suspicion that there was an AI on the end of that. It was an entirely credible conversation. The voice sounded authentic. There was breaths, there was pauses. There was all of the quirks of humanity thrown into the mix. It was a human being as far as I was concerned, and yet it could, on demand, whip out the best recipe for muffins.

So you never know. Maybe even things like this are kind of up for grabs. I hope not. I really hope not. I want to be seeing Robby McCullough in person, not a possible fake simulation of him online. Maybe that’s the perfect place to end it, Robby. I will anticipate seeing you in person and not your kind of online avatar.

[00:39:43] Robby McCullough: I would love to make that happen. Always a pleasure chatting with you, Nathan. Thank you so much for having me. This was a fun one.

[00:39:49] Nathan Wrigley: You are very welcome. Have a good day. Take it easy.

[00:39:52] Robby McCullough: You too.

[00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox Podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress. The people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case managed WordPress hosting and AI hosting innovation.

If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you, or your idea, featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox, and use the form there.

So on the podcast today, we have Malcolm Peralty. Malcolm has been immersed in the WordPress ecosystem for 20 years, starting out as a full-time blogger and working his way through tech roles in project management, agencies, and even a stint in the Drupal space. These days, Malcolm is bringing his experience back to WordPress, serving as a technical account manager at Pressable, a managed WordPress hosting company.

Malcolm shares how he found his way from early forays with WordPress to managing large scale hosting environments. He talks about the lure of the Drupal world, and why he’s ultimately returned to WordPress and Pressable.

We discuss what technical account management means at Pressable, how his role differs from sales and support, focusing instead on long-term strategy for clients, performance optimization, and bridging the gap between customer needs and the underlying WP Cloud infrastructure. We hear how Pressable proactively helps clients, sometimes even advising them to downgrade their plan if optimizations mean they need fewer resources.

We go behind the scenes in Pressable, getting into how hardware considerations, plugin bloat, WooCommerce or LMS sites, and customer handholding, all come together inside one company. Malcolm gives us a candid look at performance challenges, the way hosts interact with infrastructure teams, and why education around WordPress performance is so tough, even as competing platforms prioritise speed at all costs.

We also look into the future. What are the cutting edge trends in hosting? Like database replication, virtual clusters, and especially the rise of AI within the hosting experience. Malcolm explains Pressable’s upcoming MCP, an AI powered control panel that promises to let you deploy, and manage, wordPress sites using natural language.

We explore how AI will impact everything from customer support to site deployment, potential pitfalls, and the challenge of balancing automation with human relationships.

If you’re curious about the state of managed WordPress hosting today, the interplay of tech, support, and AI, or just want to know what’s happening behind the curtain, this episode is for you.

If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

And so without further delay, I bring you Malcolm Peralty.

I am joined on the podcast by Malcolm Peralty. Hello, Malcolm.

[00:03:55] Malcolm Peralty: Hi there. How you doing today?

[00:03:56] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. Very nice to have you with us on the podcast today. Malcolm’s got a really interesting story. He’s done a lot, a lot of it kind of maps to things that I’ve done in my life. But it’s a tech podcast, generally we talk about WordPress, but I think we’re going to talk about hosting, AI, and possibly other CMSs.

But before we do, a moment for you, Malcolm, just to introduce yourself and give us your potted bio, I guess centering around your relationship with technology, WordPress, CMSs, that kind of thing.

[00:04:22] Malcolm Peralty: Yeah. So first off, I like to always say that I’m Canadian. I think that actually kind of gives us some insight into a little bit about how I think. And I live just outside of Toronto, Ontario, Canada right now, and I’ve been in the WordPress, around the WordPress space for going on 20 years.

I started with WordPress 0.72, so before the 1.0 release. And I was a full-time blogger, talking about WordPress for several years, and kind of stumbled into using some of my tech skills to work in and around technology with WordPress, and then project management. And because of project management, I’ve been able to work with agencies that build like smartphone apps and other CMS systems, and custom CMSs for customers. But I’ve always kind of kept a toe in the WordPress world as much as possible.

[00:05:11] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, and you firmly landed back in the WordPress world working for Pressable, which we’ll talk about in a moment. But you had a bit of a foray in the Drupal, Acquia world, I think. The word Acquia may not mean a great deal to people listening to this podcast, but it’s kind of the equivalent, I suppose the best mapping would be Automattic over on the Drupal side. What was your experience with Drupal? How come you’re not still fully on the Drupal side of things?

[00:05:35] Malcolm Peralty: Yeah, so that was kind of a strange one for me. I didn’t expect to have a position in the Drupal world. I had done some like Drupal project management before, a lot of like moving Drupal sites to WordPress or like revising a Drupal site, or adding a smartphone app to a Drupal site. But that was mostly, again, as like a project manager or a site builder, not as like someone who really understood the engineering behind Drupal.

But a long time friend of mine reached out and said, hey, would you ever be interested in a job at Acquia working at the Drupal mothership, so to speak? And the position was a technical account manager, which thankfully leans more on my skills as a project manager and someone who understands web hosting than someone who understands Drupal. So I was able to use the combination of 20 years of skills in the space to actually make a good go at it.

And I think one of the big reasons why I was so enticed and interested by the position is, honestly, Drupal jobs pay better than WordPress jobs. And it’s horrible and sad to say, but I think it was a really important factor in my determination on where my career was moving. If it wasn’t for the fact that Pressable came along when it did, and basically offered me a similar kind of pay scale, I’d probably still be in the Drupal space and who knows for how long.

[00:06:55] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, that’s really interesting. I was a big Drupal user for many years but just found it was, there was a lot of things that I didn’t need that Drupal did, that WordPress could do. And so I firmly moved ship away from Drupal. Well, I think it was when Drupal finally went to version eight, so many, many years ago. Something like 2015 or something like that. And I certainly haven’t looked back.

So Pressable, you may need to go and Google that if you’re listening to this podcast. You may have heard that name before, but it is a hosting company, I guess managed hosting, dedicated hosting for WordPress websites. My understanding is they don’t do anything else. Pressable simply work with WordPress. But what’s your role over there? Let’s begin there.

[00:07:37] Malcolm Peralty: Yeah, so I’m a technical account manager. I’m the second technical account manager that Pressable has hired. They’re trying to build out a technical account management discipline. For those that haven’t heard the term technical account management before, you might think it’s like a sales role or something like that with a technical bent, and that’s not it at all.

We’re basically, you know, like WordPress and WordPress hosting strategists, right? So we’re thinking about like, what does your website look like a year from now, two years from now? What technologies do you need to be aware of? What end of lifes will come up that you might need to develop against? What plugins and tools are you using and how performant are they, and are there more performant options in the mix that might work for you? And so that’s really kind of the role that we take at Pressable.

Right now a lot of it is also kind of the pre-sales, right? Like which tier of service or product will your website fit into? What kind of customisations or optimisations might you want to make in moving over to the Pressable platform? And so we kind of go through all of that with customers of kind of a certain scale and size.

[00:08:36] Nathan Wrigley: So do you, as part of the job description then, do you monitor existing websites that are on the platform already and look for, let’s say things like bottlenecks, where something’s going wrong? The client may not be aware of it, but you can then sort of inject yourself, begin a conversation and say look, you’ve got this suite of plugins, that’s great, but we’ve noticed that improvements could be made here, there, and the other. And here’s a suggestion for something that maybe will get rid of that problem.

[00:09:02] Malcolm Peralty: We do get to do a little bit of that, not as much as I would like. My long-term hope would be that, much like Acquia, much WordPress VIP, TAM would be like a subscription service that customers of a certain tier would be able to sign up for, and have like that consistent access and that consistent monitoring where, like on a monthly basis, you know, we’d go through our client list and like double check all of them.

Right now we’re sometimes a point of escalation for support if need be, where they’re like, this problem’s going to take more than an hour to solve. Maybe the solutions team and the TAMs can kind of take a look at this and dive deep into it. We also kind of monitor the data coming in from our server instances. And, yeah, we’ll sometimes kind of cherry pick some of the ones that are standing out as not working as well as they should be, or using more resources than they should be, just as a point of like general optimisation, right?

It’s funny because our role helps both the customer because, again, we don’t care about the money side, right. So we’ll come in and be like, here’s the optimisations you need to make. Now you don’t need even as quite a big a plan as you have maybe. Maybe you need to downsize your plan now because we’ve helped you optimise your website.

But from a resourcing perspective on the Pressable side, it’s also advantageous because one, it makes the company look good to be proactive in that way. And two, it helps for server resources, right? We have our own cloud, WP Cloud, which is our own server stack. It’s not AWS, it’s not Google Cloud. And so optimising resources can allow us to have resources available for other people who maybe are bursting because of a big sale or front page of Reddit or something like that. So we’re always looking at those optimisations as an opportunity on both.

[00:10:37] Nathan Wrigley: Do you, as part of your role, get to sort of interface somewhere between the customer, the people who pay you to have hosting and the hardware side of WP Cloud? Because presumably on the WP Cloud side of things, there’s a hardware layer. There’s literally people putting boxes into racks and putting the cables in and what have you.

Because my understanding is WP Cloud is owned, well, it’s not AWS, let’s call it that. It’s not Google’s Cloud infrastructure. It’s not any of those other things. It’s managed, known by whom, you can tell us in a moment. But do you get to have a conversation, say, look, we’ve noticed that this bit of hardware isn’t as performant as maybe something else? Or, look, here’s some new thing that’s been released onto the market, can we get a dozen of those and try that out?

[00:11:17] Malcolm Peralty: For sure. And as Pressable continues, try to move towards the higher end of mid market to try to acquire customers that are using WooCommerce or learning management systems, we’re finding those platform opportunities where we’re providing like, here’s what we’re seeing, you know, here’s all this data that we’re collecting. Here’s what we think this means. Here’s what maybe our competitors have done, or what our customers have noticed on competitor platforms. How can we either like negate the advantages of other platforms? Or how can we find ways to make ourselves even better than them? Or, here’s what we’re already doing, great, is there any fine tuning that we can do to like eek out that extra little bit of performance?

We try not to be too prescriptive with the WP Cloud team because they really are the experts in the hardware. But we bring a lot of that WordPress knowledge to bear and say like, this is what we’re seeing from a WordPress perspective, what can you do on a hardware and software on the server perspective to kind of make this work even better?

[00:12:12] Nathan Wrigley: It’s a difficult juggling act to perform in a way, isn’t it? Because on the one hand, we’re always talking about how performant WordPress can be, and on the other hand, we’re always talking about plugins and themes and the fact that amassing those will slow things down. You know, you throw in an LMS or WooCommerce or something like that and suddenly the website is going to be a different animal, let’s put it that way.

And so on the one hand, trying to pitch WordPress as performant, and then on the other hand, there’s this whole bit that you are dealing with where the performance is somewhat under question. I’ve always thought that’s a difficult challenge. And certainly in terms of marketing that and making the public understand that, okay, there’s the performance on one side, but we can manage that on the other side. I think that’s a really difficult thing to do because you’re trying to communicate something incredibly technical to presumably a whole load of people, some of whom aren’t technical at all.

[00:13:03] Malcolm Peralty: And even worse, a lot of other competing hosts will hide a lot of issues and faults and sins that customers have made on their website through like heavily used Redis setups that like just make it seem like their website is so much faster than it actually is. Or they’ll buy hardware that is, you know, has like the fastest CPUs. And so from you as a single user testing your website, you might say, wow, my website is so fast on this other platform, but when I move it to this company, now it feels slow. But you’re not doing a test at scale. You’re doing an individual test, right?

So you go on that hardware and you put like 25, 100, 1,000 users going through a checkout process, and all of a sudden your website is slow as molasses and starts falling over. Whereas on the platform that quote, unquote, seems slower, it’s so much more resilient and able to handle that load.

So there’s so much nuance here and so many things that we’re dealing with and a lot of the job ends up being at customer education because it’s very easy in the commodity hosting space to be like, I’m going to move to this other company because they seem faster. And that really shouldn’t be your single goal. It should be understanding your website. But a lot of small business owners, medium sized business owners, even large business owners don’t really necessarily want to understand how their website is built and how their pages are built and these kinds of things.

And it’s funny you mentioned about the WordPress performance thing because sometimes I want to be like, just do this one thing for me, right? On our platform, turn off all your plugins, go back to the default theme, tell me how fast your website loads because guess what, it’s probably going to load pretty darn fast, right?

The problem I have is the customers that have 50, 60, 70 plus plugins, and two of them are different like builder tools, which is unfortunately the bane of my existence. No offence to like Elementor and Divi and Beaver Builder and all these companies that are making these tools to help people have their dream website on the internet. But man, are they ever heavy and slow when you’re trying to create a performant website these days?

And so, you know, I’m often having these conversations about, what is most important to you? And understanding as well that search engines like Google, and search engine companies believe that performance is a big deal because that’s how they manage their own infrastructure, right? If a website is slow, then they can’t really crawl it effectively and understand what’s going on with it. So that plays into a lot of the conversations that I have as well. And it’s never easy.

[00:15:23] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I imagine it’s not. I mean, I don’t know if the goal of Pressable is to make it such that you show up with your website, pay your monthly subscription, whatever it may be, and kind of that’s it. We will take it from here. I don’t know if that’s the goal. Or if it’s more of a, we will have a conversation with you, we will make recommendations and over a period of time, we will come to some sort of happy medium where, you know, what you’ve got is what you are happy with and it’s also performant from our side.

So I don’t know how much of a conversation is there. Any website that I’ve ever brought to Pressable has been fairly straightforward. I’ve installed it, it’s worked exactly as I had anticipated, and so I’ve never really had to get into it. But, you know, a website with 10,000 SKUs, and a million visitors a day, presumably there has to be some handholding going on there.

[00:16:09] Malcolm Peralty: Yeah, I think the big point of delineation is the cacheability of a site, right? So the ability for us to serve it without building the pages from scratch. If you have a brochure site, if you have a marketing site, if you are, you know, the only thing on your website that’s like a real user interaction is some buttons and maybe a form to submit, like a contact form or a marketing related form, your website is going to run perfectly on Pressable without any kind of handholding, without any kind of consultation. You’re going to be able to upload it and know it’s going to be resilient to whatever traffic you receive, and even like power outages in entire halfs of countries won’t bring your website down.

If that’s the kind of experience you want, those plan tiers exist and they work great. And we have agencies that throw thousands of websites on Pressable’s platform in that kind of umbrella without any kind of issue or concern or question.

I think the consultative part comes in when you’re starting to do things like I mentioned before, learning management systems, e-commerce systems, merch drops, custom contests. If you’re doing anything that basically has a different user experience based on adding something into a cart, or like completing a module of learning that needs to be tracked and following the user, typically this means that it’s going to be uncached, which means that it’s going to rebuild that page from scratch, and that requires a fair bit of resources.

We’ve optimised a lot of things to make sure that we can do that effectively, but again, the conversation comes into play, if you add in Facebook for WooCommerce plugin that breaks cache on every page load, then we have to work with our customers to understand like what that means, and what the trade-offs are, and what replacements might exist to make it so that we can cache the majority of sessions so that they can stick within their resource utilisations that we expect them to use.

Most companies, including Pressable will sell on like the number of visits to the website, but also another piece is the amount of workers, right? So these are the little pieces of software behind the scenes that actually complete all of the things that users are requesting, right? Serving up images and web pages and shopping carts and stuff like that.

We have a really cool model where we have one worker per one VCPU, which basically means you get your own dedicated highway for that worker. He’s his own little car on his own little highway lane. Where a lot of companies will do like 40 workers to one VCPU. So imagine 40 cars on one lane highway, versus five cars on a five lane highway. So the way that we process things is a little bit different as well, and so that requires a little bit of education on our side.

[00:18:32] Nathan Wrigley: I think there’s this whole mysterious scientific laboratory kind of impression to hosting, if you know what I mean? I’m imagining a room, a laboratory, sort of white walls and everything, with a bunch of people wearing white overalls with pens neatly lined up in their top pocket, and obsessing about these acronyms. Well, this isn’t an acronym, but you mentioned workers.

But you’ve got things like Redis, you’ve got things like edge caching and all of this kind of stuff. And honestly, to me, a lot of that is a bit of a puzzle. And I don’t know how you educate the public about those things other than just saying, just don’t worry about it. We’re here for you. We’ll deal with that complexity.

But also, I’m curious to know what kind of innovations are there still to be done? Now obviously we’re sort of crystal ball gazing a little bit here, but I am curious about where is the bleeding edge of server technology and hosting technology? What are the things which are just a little bit over the horizon, but are of interest, which may drop in the next year, two years, three years, something like that?

[00:19:34] Malcolm Peralty: Yeah, I would say we’re seeing a lot of web assembly type efforts, which is kind of interesting, which is, yeah, I don’t know if anyone’s ever seen, there’s a WordPress Playground site where you can have like WordPress basically running in a browser. You don’t have to install it anywhere. It just exists in your browser as like this ephemeral install of WordPress that you can play with and do stuff with, and then export to a real install of WordPress if you’re interested.

I think that is a super impactful and interesting technology, and we’ll see probably more of that in the next little while, and how hosts can kind of play into that. I think that we’ll also see better caching technology, better database technology, but also I think better replication technology. So everyone knows that a lot of WordPress kind of exists within the database, and so if you want to have high availability, you need to be able to have that database exist in multiple places. But if you’re doing transactions on your like primary database for like e-commerce, you’re like buying products and you have, Malcolm bought a t-shirt from my website, he wants this size and he wants it shipped here, we need to now replicate that to any other like high availability databases that we have. That replication right now is very old technology in a lot of ways, and it’s not as optimised as we would like it to be. So there’s a latency that exists there in replicating that to other places.

Acquia and some of the other companies I worked for, that latency could be really high or really low depending on how it was configured, right? How long do we kind of keep that data there before we send it over?

We try to do as much real-time streaming at Pressable as possible to make it so like, you know, within like two seconds, the data is now in that replication. And so if your primary goes down, you’ve lost maybe a second or two seconds of data. On some websites, even that can be really bad, right? Because if you, let’s say you’re doing a big product drop and you have 10,000 people wanting to buy tickets to your concert, and you lose two seconds of data, that could be hundreds of transactions that just evaporate into the ether. So better ways of syncing that data across, and managing that relationship between multiple servers I think is going to be a big transition that we see in the marketplace.

We’re already seeing the idea of virtual clusters. So multiple data centres pretending to be like one local server. So then we don’t have that same feel of migrating or syncing data between locations, it just pretends it’s all kind of in the same place. So I think that will be kind of interesting to see because again, that adds more resiliency. And I think, everyone that I’ve ever talked to, if you say like, how long are you okay with your website being down? Even if it’s not a moneymaking website, you’ll hear them say something like, I don’t know, maybe an hour at most, right? So finding ways to make websites more resilient is going to be important.

And then I think just a better understanding just from top to bottom on what’s happening with a website, right? So we have a lot of logging, but it’s not necessarily the best at auditing. So, for example, if Nathan came on my website and got access to it and deleted a plugin, I might not have the best tools right now to be able to say, oh, it was this IP address at this time, he logged into this user, he did this action, and have that complete picture to be able to kind of quickly and easily reverse.

We kind of depend on backups right now a lot of the time, and I hate that. Or we depend on like trying to fish through logs and make those connections using our human brains. All of that is just a really poor solution and I think AI will hopefully help with some of that, and I’m looking forward to having more of this like very specific picture of every action that has on a website without, again, adding a whole bunch of load to the server environment or a whole bunch of data storage requirements that makes it really impossible for organisations to kind of have all this information, right?

Because if I start auditing every action that I’m taking on a website that I have access to, and you think of Pressable having multiple thousands of websites, hosting platforms, you can imagine the amount of data we’d then need to record, right? So data compression becomes super important, or the ability to kind of infer things based on data that we’re seeing becomes important. The amount of work that I do in like looking through logs would make your eyes kind of pop out of your head. It’s brutal sometimes. And logs have never been very user friendly.

So again, another area that AI has been helping us with is like, okay, pull out the things that are potentially the most impactful, the most interesting, the things that stand out over like a statistics, probability kind of system.

[00:23:48] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I think what’s really curious about everything that you’ve just said is, so there’s this kind of impression for people who are just casual users of WordPress that you go to a hosting company, it’s a bunch of files and it’s a database, how hard can it be?

And then you’ve just given us a bit of a window into, well, this is how hard it can be, because there’s so many scenarios. And the typical mom and pop store where, like you said, an hour’s downtime might not be the end of the world, and most of the things can be cash and all that kind of thing. Well, that stands in real contrast to the, I don’t know, the gigantic megacorp .com company that’s doing 8,000 transactions every couple of minutes and there’s millions of dollars going through. And there’s just a whole other layer of things going on there.

And so you see the word Pressable and you think, hosting company, pretty straightforward. And I think it’s really interesting that you get an opportunity to come on and say, well, actually, no, there’s this other layer. There’s all this stuff going on in the background. There’s all of this technology. We’re thinking about the future. You know, we’ve got different geographical locations where things are housed, and we’re trying to speed that up so that there are all these different clusters. It sounds complicated, essentially. I’ll boil it down to that.

So I am a Pressable customer and when I go into the Pressable admin, I sort of log in and, you know, I’m presented with the usual array of different options. I would say that there’s more than probably somebody like me is requiring, but there it is anyway. You know, there’s lots of different options for tweaking this, that, and the other thing.

What I’m trying to sort of draw an analogy to is that it can be a little bit overwhelming if your day job isn’t to deal with a website. You log in and, what is this? What does this menu even exist? There’s probably ways of Googling it and finding it out. But I know that in the near future, Pressable is going to be launching sort of like an AI component to the hosting side of things. An MCP, you’ve described it as Pressable’s MCP. And then in parentheses, get AI to do things related to your hosting, whether that’s WooCommerce or WordPress or performance optimisation or whatever it would be.

So this is interesting. And I’m just curious as to how deep are you going to allow the AI to go? We all know that the AI, any AI can hallucinate. So I’m curious as to know what kind of things are you unleashing for the AI? Is it just a case of, okay, I would like the light theme now, please? Or does it penetrate much deeper than that?

[00:26:10] Malcolm Peralty: So it’ll be in phases over the next little while, we’ll unveil these features and what connections that we have. But eventually the expectation is, anything that you could do or click on as a user in the control panel, an AI could also act on and do as well. So a great example that we’ve been giving our agency partners is if you, let’s say, are working on code for a customer’s website, you could say to the AI built into your Visual Studio Code or your GitHub or whatever, hey, spin up another sandbox site, push this code, update the database, pull from production, all the files, and let me know when this is complete.

And the MCP will go and it will spin up a new sandbox site, a new WordPress install, with a new domain name attached to it. It will grab your code and push it up to that website. It’ll go to production and grab the files from the wp-content uploads folder, and sync it over to this new staging site or sandbox site that you’ve asked for. And then it’ll say, hey, by the way, it’s now ready for testing.

And you’ve done this all with natural language as a command behind the scenes. Or, let’s say you’re running a thousand sites, tell me all the websites that need like a Gravity Forms plugin update. And it will go and it’ll check all of your websites in the Pressable platform and give you a list of like, hey, here are the ones with Gravity Forms updates. And you could say, okay, update them for me please. And it’ll go back and it’ll do that job.

[00:27:24] Nathan Wrigley: So I guess the goal is to make it straightforward to use natural language to do a variety of tasks. Now obviously there’s got to be some serious guardrails around this because, you know, it would be very easy to inadvertently type, delete all of my, that’s a bad example but you get point. You know, what are the contraints?

[00:27:43] Malcolm Peralty: Yeah, please don’t use dangerously skip permissions, for example. So a lot of the AI tools that already exist have some human in the loop questioning. Are you sure you want me to do this? Are you sure you want me to do this kind of thing? And kind of seek their approval. We’re also talking about what, if anything, we’re really going to do on our side about that? We have pretty solid backup solutions put in place. So maybe if you, you know, accidentally said, clear out all of my platform, and it deleted all of your websites, you could then hopefully say, can you actually restore from backups all of those sites and have it restore from backups all of those sites.

So, you know, we keep hourly backups of database, daily of the WordPress file system, so there is that. Also our main WordPress install is simlinked, which means that you can’t actually change any of the core files. So even if you told it to delete WordPress, it can’t actually do that piece of it. So your WordPress install would still exist, but all your plugins and uploads and database would all be gone. But you could just restore them again using natural language.

So there are some guide rails that we can put in, but at the end of the day like, you’ll be able to connect whatever AI tool you’re using. Maybe you have Ollama with a local AI tool on your computer. Maybe you’re using Claude or Codex or something else. You’ll be able to use any of those AI tools. And so some of it is really on the person using it to put in some of those guardrails and those human and loop things. And I would recommend having a like system prompt that basically says like, before you do anything destructive, check with me first. Not that it won’t automatically do some of that, but it’s just good to have a secondary layer.

[00:29:13] Nathan Wrigley: And how are you exposing these capabilities to, let’s say Claude or whatever it may be? So what does that interaction look like? How is it that certain capabilities are available, but others are maybe not, and so on.

[00:29:25] Malcolm Peralty: Yeah, I mean I like to think of an MCP kind of like USB/API for AI. So we’re basically just making those kind of endpoints available to the MCP, or making like those API endpoints available to AI, so that it can undertake things on your behalf. So like our whole control panel is basically APIs all the way down, so to speak. So it’s not very hard to kind of hook those things up.

I think the harder part is making sure that the AI understands what these controls, what these APIs do, what they expect to receive, what they expect to give back, and what that all means. And once all of those kind of definitions are in place, then it’s pretty easy.

[00:30:05] Nathan Wrigley: I think one of the curious things for me is being inside, let’s say the Pressable UI where I’m navigating with a mouse and I’m clicking on things, everything is very intentional. You know, I go to a thing, and I do a thing, and I get a prompt to say, are you sure you want to do this thing? And I say, yes. And so it goes. And so every single thing that I do requires an interaction with me.

I suppose, with an AI, you could concatenate a variety of things. Maybe the AI has some sort of misunderstanding along the way, or you type things in such a way that it’s not entirely clear. And then kind of unpicking, okay, what just happened? It’s really easy to unpick that in the UI because you can say to the support rep, well, I did this, and then the site died. Okay, we know what happened there.

Whereas with this cascade of things, which is done with natural language, presumably this is where your logging, that you described earlier, comes in. There isn’t really a question there, but I’m curious as to what that process is. The capacity for many dominoes to fall from just one simple prompt, I suppose as a point of concern for you guys, because you are going to have to be unpicking all of this on the backend when things, which they inevitably will, go wrong.

[00:31:16] Malcolm Peralty: For sure. And I mean this is one of those areas though where we’re ahead of the curve. I think a lot of companies will be adding these kinds of things. But from an AI perspective, I mean, since October or November of last year, we’ve seen the skills and abilities and understanding of the top tier AI tools just jump exponentially. So the number of mistakes or concerns that we have have gone down in that same vein.

Our support team has also been trained up in a lot of these. And we’ve been testing a lot of these MCP pieces for a long time now. So we feel pretty confident that those that enable this and that have a good understanding of what this means and how to use it won’t make too many mistakes or have too many concerns or issues.

You know, again, we’re targeting a lot of our agency partners that are developers that already kind of live and breathe this stuff. So they’re also used to being able to untangle and knot if they tie themselves in one. So I don’t expect someone with their like first WordPress website on Pressable to enable MCP and start using it.

I really think this is most valuable to agencies or companies at scale. You know, if you’re running one website, you probably don’t need this, but if you’re running like 10, 100, 1,000 websites, then this tooling becomes very helpful. Because you can have like a, maybe do it on one site and now then replicate that same thing you just did across all of the sites I manage.

[00:32:33] Nathan Wrigley: I don’t really know how to phrase this question, but I’ll give this a go. At the moment, presumably you have a fairly solid relationship with your customers. You know, if something goes wrong, you log in, you enable the chat widget, you have that conversation. There’s this backwards and forwards, okay, great. And maybe there’s lots of clients that you get that you never have that interaction with.

But I’m just curious how that relationship over time might change with the advent of AI. And what I mean by that is, it’s almost like you’re not talking to humans anymore. And because of that, you start to have a different impression of the company that you are dealing with. Okay, it’s just some sort of AI entity, I don’t need to worry about it so much. Maybe loyalty starts to come into question because there’s no humans there anyway.

So again, it’s very hard to encapsulate what I’m saying, but presumably from a marketing point of view, there has to be some moment at which you say, okay, there’s too much AI now. We’re no longer a bunch of humans presenting ourselves to the world. We just look like a bunch of robots. Do you know what I’m saying there? Does any of that land?

[00:33:34] Malcolm Peralty: It does. I will say, we have those conversations internally. The expectation is always going to be like, when we add a new feature, it’s going to be added for humans first and then added to our AI tooling. But the only way that you can compete in the modern marketplace is to take advantage of some of the tools and opportunities we’ve been given with AI. As difficult as it is, there’s probably a business case, you know, I’m sure there will be businesses that will target people saying like, we don’t use AI for support, we don’t have AI integrations, we’re a completely human business. But I think the difficulty will be like scaling and competing in the modern marketplace.

And like a lot of the agencies we’re talking to are expecting this. They’re pushing us towards this because they’re looking to reduce their time to delivery, right? They want to be able to sit in a coffee shop with a customer, get a brief of the business, give that brief to, you know, an AI tool that transcribes their voice to words, and then have it go through this whole system of setting up a hosting sandbox for the website, set up WordPress, select a theme that matches their expectations, set up the brand colours, and almost have like a proof of concept at the end of a meal with a customer, that was assisted by AI.

And if they can’t do that first step of setting up a sandbox or a staging site for the customer, then we’re not part of that conversation at all. They’re going to go where there is that feature and that functionality, and Pressable won’t be part of that conversation at all.

And as end users, I mean, having AI assist with the things that agencies or higher touchpoint customers need, gives us that flexibility now to be available for the $25 a month customers who actually need the handholding and support from a human that we just couldn’t do otherwise, right? It just doesn’t scale properly at that price point.

So I think this could be advantageous to both sides if it’s used right and done right. But I definitely agree, there’s landmines that we have to kind of be cautious of and avoid, and we have to be very careful about how we apply this. And I think the key thing is always making sure that everything that we do is human first, and then AI enhanced, rather than AI first and human supplemented. It’s just a hard line to walk.

[00:35:37] Nathan Wrigley: It’s so interesting that conversation you’ve just described in the cafe where, by the end of the cup of coffee, you’ve got yourself a website based upon a conversation you were having moments before. The collapse of the timeline there. You know, we used to think that this five minute install was a big thing. Now it’s like the five minute website that’s fully ready to go, you know, or at least some simulation of a website. May not be the finished one but, you know, you’ve got a staging site ready, with a theme that’s adjacent to what you want to do, with some content that might replicate what you want to do. And it all took place in less time than it took you to finish a single coffee. And that’s so interesting. And you have to armour yourself against that.

That raises another question of course, which is how far you, your tentacles go into the website itself. Because traditionally hosting companies really didn’t concern themselves with the website, apart from the fact that the website was available and, you know, we can see what your plugins are and yada, yada. But it does sound like we’re straying into theming, and possible content creation and things like that. So I don’t know if that falls into the roadmap a bit as well.

So maybe there’s a future where you can, with the AI sort of say, I’d like to swap out my theme. It’s Christmas time, give me a Christmas theme. But we’re doing that in the hosting environment. We’re not necessarily having to log into the website. Again, do you sort of see where I’m going with that?

[00:37:03] Malcolm Peralty: Yeah, and I foresee for sure, but the integrations with AI that WordPress 7.0 already has, and the discussions for 7.1 make me believe that Pressable’s MCP will be able to talk to WordPress’s AI integration and do that from end to end. So, I mean we could already do it with the MCP, like adjusting database values and stuff like that, but that’s not what I would consider an ideal way of doing this.

But like I said, with the changes that are happening in WordPress Core, I definitely foresee like a complete end-to-end solution. You know, one AI talking to another, who then carries that task forward, reports back to the Pressable MCP and lets us know that theme change is done, those plugin updates are done, the content change is done. And again, all from that initial prompt, you know, maybe in your Visual Studio Code, which is just crazy to me.

[00:37:45] Nathan Wrigley: I am so used to basically not going back to the hosting until there’s a problem. You know, I go to the login URL for the website in question, I log in, I move around the WordPress UI, create a post, publish a post, schedule something, whatever, upload some assets. You get the idea.

And the idea of that not being the modus operandi for everybody will be so interesting, because it’s going to shatter that experience of, you know, you could watch a YouTube video to figure out the thing because everybody does the thing in the same way.

But it feels like we’re heralding a future where no two people are going to have the exact same experience. You know, you may be creating content through a text editor, which then somehow gets uploaded, or the text editor merely creates a prompt, and then the theme is swapped or amended because you’ve typed in some prompt.

So, you know, my UI, my IDE, my text editor, my version of WordPress, maybe I might build my site entirely differently to you. So that’s fascinating and slightly worrying at the same time because, how do you support that? Not just Pressable, but how does the community support it when we’ve got an infinite number of ways to create a blog post?

[00:38:55] Malcolm Peralty: And not just a blog post, but everything.

[00:38:57] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, right, everything. Yep.

[00:38:58] Malcolm Peralty: Maybe you say you want this Christmas theme. Maybe it doesn’t select a theme and change the colours, maybe it writes a whole new CSS for the theme you have. Or maybe it writes a whole new theme, or maybe it writes a plugin that automatically switches it around Christmas time. Like it doesn’t have to pull off the shelf from the theme marketplace or the plugin marketplace that already exists. It can create something wholly new and specific for you.

Maybe it writes a whole new block for you, rather than trying to pull together three or four blocks to be able to create the output that you’re looking for. And some of these things for sure are not going to necessarily be super performant or super secure, especially initially, right? Maybe a year or two from now, once the AI is even smarter than it is today, or has a better understanding of WordPress than it does today. Maybe it will kind of think more about security and performance than it does right now. But you’re going to have these people deploying things that are not the ideal outcome, or ideal solution, or ideal anything. It’s just works for them right now.

And it’s funny, I always hear people talk about maintenance, right? How are we going to maintain all this AI code? We, humans are not going to maintain all this AI code. AI is going to maintain and update all this AI code. And so the joke of it is, if you come along and your host comes back to you and says, hey, your website’s running like a dog. You’re not going to spend half a day or a day trying to troubleshoot anymore. You’re just going to say, hey, AI, why is my website running poorly? Fix it or give me a list of things that need to be fixed, or what have you.

I at Pressable am already like using AI to basically write scripts that run through like two dozen WP-CLI commands, another two dozen like database commands, and some like full code searches. Give me a quick report on anything that needs to be optimised, right? So I didn’t write that script from scratch, I didn’t write that code from scratch to do that. I directed an AI to be able to create that for me. And now as the human in loop, I’m interpreting the data that it’s collected, but I can foresee a future very near where I say, hey, AI now interpret all this data you’ve collected and send a summary to the customer on what they need to change or do. Go and act on my behalf and make these changes.

[00:40:49] Nathan Wrigley: That’s so interesting. So there’s a couple of things. The first one is that it feels almost like we’re heralding in a future in which the WordPress UI maybe is not seen by everybody. So a good example would be, I have a Mac. I rarely use the Mac. I use things on the Mac. You know, I’m using a browser. I use a text editor. I use the application that we’re using to record. I’m not really using the Mac. I hope that lands, if you understand what I mean. I switch it on, but the Mac kind of just goes into the background and I use a bunch of things, which, they’re on the screen because I’ve got a Mac.

[00:41:25] Malcolm Peralty: And I would say like 90% of it’s probably a browser at this point, right?

[00:41:28] Nathan Wrigley: Right, right.

[00:41:30] Malcolm Peralty: It’s a website that you go to. You can do Slack in a browser. You can do what we’re doing today in a browser. Pretty much most things that I do live in a browser. There’s very few applications that I actually need to load on my machine day to day because everything can exist in a browser. I think that paradigm will just be for the next generation, or for the transition that’s happening now, the new paradigm will be everything just lives in an AI application. Whether it’s installing your computer or whether it’s also in a browser. It’ll just be AI.

[00:41:54] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, so it is analogous to that. It’s just this idea that the WordPress UI, that’s the only method that anybody has had, maybe that will be something that a bunch of people use, but it won’t be familiar to everybody because there’s no need for it.

And the other thing that you mentioned is, I suppose I would use any of the stuff that you’ve described, but there’s the one caveat. And the one caveat is I have to know that I can walk it back. I have to know that there is a way for me to undo every mistake that I just made because I got carried away. I sat down, got a bit carried away on a Saturday afternoon, made a bunch of tweaks. I really regret it. I want to know that I can go back and unpick that stuff and for it to be a seamless unpicking. So backups, I guess is the most straightforward way of doing that.

[00:42:40] Malcolm Peralty: And audit logs, right? So like one of the things that I’ve done is, in my system instructions, I do put, before you do anything else, backup the file system, backup the database and create a, like a markdown file that’s going to be step by step, everything that was done, everything that you thought so that I can then review it. And that really helps me kind of get an understanding of the tasks it took and maybe why it took them, to help me refine future attempts, right?

So going back to what we’re doing in hosting, like we’re always trying to think through, like you mentioned, everything is very specific and clickable, and we want to make sure that the AI understands exactly kind of what to click on, or what to select. And having that auditing is super important for that.

[00:43:19] Nathan Wrigley: And that’s the point, isn’t it? It’s a human readable or parsable log of everything. Something where, you know, you’ve got millions of data points in the audit log, but I can actually drill down into that in a meaningful way. Because it may be that I only want to undo a portion of what I did. I’m happy with some things, but I would like to go back. An audit log, as you’ve said, it’s fairly mind numbing stuff.

But we are going to be producing so many more amendments if all we have to do is speak because you can easily, you know, imagine it. I want the Christmas theme. No, not that one. Try something else. No, there’s too much red in that. Swap the red for the blue. And Father Christmas, I’d like him on the homepage but, no, a different one. In 12 seconds we’ve got thousands and thousands of things that have happened.

[00:44:06] Malcolm Peralty: I will say though, how much of that do you remember doing manually, right? Like I’ve gotten to the end of that kind of thought process and gone, wait, there was like a theme like two or three themes ago that actually was, a little bit of customisation could have been cool. What was that theme?

Even as a human, I’ve had lapses in memory when I’m quickly producing outcomes where I can’t necessarily roll it back so easily. So at least with an audit log, you’ll have a much better understanding of what was done and when. Human memory is also failable.

[00:44:30] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, and I guess it’ll be interesting to see how much of that burden companies like Pressable take on. Like, you mentioned backups, maybe it will become de rigueur for you every few seconds whilst there’s interactions with MCPs. Look, we’re just going to go belt and braces. Every time you do something, which we detect is fairly sizable, we’re just going to take a backup, even though you never asked us to just in case. You know, those kind of things.

And have a UI to surface information so that the audit log is readable and those kind of things. And that’s all ahead of you. So it doesn’t exist moment, but it’ll certainly be things that will need to be tooled and invented in the future, I would’ve imagined.

[00:45:10] Malcolm Peralty: I mean, one of the hard parts, this might be transitioning the conversation a little bit, one of the hard parts is, you mentioned that AI is creating all these artefacts, and now all these potential backups. AI is already like indexing all of these websites and creating a lot of web traffic, and a lot of load on servers, for example. We had a recent instance where an AI bot went to a website and kept on adding different products to the cart and removing them. Well, every time it added a product to a cart was now an uncachable session.

And it did this millions of times over the course of a day. So we were like, okay, we got to block this bot. This is crazy. So we blocked the bot and about like 10 minutes later we start seeing the exact same traffic pattern from a completely different IP address with a completely different user agent. The bot had figured out an end way around our block and was now doing that same task again to try to, I don’t know, understand this website better, right?

The problem is, as an industry, we don’t know how to pass these costs on to customers because they think it’s kind of unfair in a way, right? Like, why should I have to pay for additional storage for all these audit logs and all these backups? For more bandwidth for my website or more resources for my website, to host or send all of my pages to these different AI bots? And it all kind of comes on us where we either have to like comp all of this technical effort that’s existing, or we have to convince clients to be okay with paying for it. And that has been a really interesting change in the dynamic with a hosting partner.

[00:46:24] Nathan Wrigley: That is so interesting. All those hidden costs, all those hidden things going on. Maybe there needs to be a luddite toggle in the UI somewhere where you just disable all of it. I want the WordPress UI, I want to do things manually. This is my preferred way of doing things.

[00:46:38] Malcolm Peralty: Block ChatGPT. Block Claude. I don’t want any of them viewing my website. Forget them.

[00:46:42] Nathan Wrigley: But it will be curious to see if there’s a subset of people who are, as you’ve described, unwilling to pay for that stuff because it’s simply something that they don’t use. They have no anticipation of using. It will be interesting to see if there’s a subset of people.

And also how clever these technologies become to disrupt things like that. You know, malicious actors out there who managed to come up with a million different ways to circuit around the blocks that you put on. And it will be interesting to see if just the cost of being online does rise with the advent of AI.

I mean, certainly the storage of all of these things is certainly going to rise. The conversations with the AI is certainly adding a financial cost. You know, there’s lots of hardware being built at the moment and there’s a cost to that. Certainly isn’t cheap. But whether or not we can cope with that, and whether or not your price points can keep up with that, and whether customers are going to pay for it.

Okay, there we go. That is so interesting. There’s so much stuff to dive into there. We could probably talk for another hour or so, but there we go. So, Malcolm, if anybody wants to reach out to you or learn more about Pressable, I guess, where would we reach out to you? Do you do social media or whatever it may be?

[00:47:51] Malcolm Peralty: I try not to. For Pressable, it’s pressable.com. For myself, I’d prefer you go through my personal website, which is my last name, .com. So peralty.com. And if you do want to get me on social media, honestly, really the only one I’m ever on is LinkedIn and I only kind of connect with people that I actually connect with. And then Twitter or X or whatever it’s called, I passively view from time to time. But honestly, the best other places would be, you know, you could probably find me on one of the WordPress Slack communities, for example, if you’re really interested.

[00:48:18] Nathan Wrigley: Okay, so Peralty, peralty.com. If you are driving a car listening to this and you can’t write it down, then go to wptavern.com, search for the episode with Malcolm Peralty in it, we will have all of the links that were suggested and talked about during this episode right on the episode show notes. So, Malcolm, thank you so much for chatting to me today and peeling back the curtain a little bit on the hosting over at Pressable. Thank you.

[00:48:42] Malcolm Peralty: I appreciate it. Appreciate it so much. Thank you for having me.

[00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox Podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

[00:00:26] Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress, the people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case how web accessibility boosts traffic, SEO, and revenue.

[00:00:39] If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

[00:00:56] If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you or your idea featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox and use the form there.

[00:01:13] So on the podcast today we have Anne Bovelett.

[00:01:16] Anne is a seasoned accessibility strategist with many years of experience in the tech industry. Her journey into accessible design began several years ago, and since then, she’s become a passionate advocate for making the web a more inclusive place. Especially for WordPress users and developers. Drawing from her background in consulting, training, and her own experiences, Anne’s work focuses on the intersection of accessibility, universal design, and tangible business outcomes.

[00:01:46] This episode explores accessibility, not just as a moral imperative, but as a strategic advantage for website owners and businesses. Anne explains how neglecting accessibility means you are leaving serious money on the table, referencing compelling research from a variety of credible sources. These studies reveal practical data. Compliant sites enjoy increases in organic traffic, a boost in keyword rankings, stronger authority, and significant financial opportunities, sometimes running into millions and even billions.

[00:02:22] Anne talks about why accessibility hasn’t always been prioritised on the web, using analogies of the physical world, and the history of web development. She gets into the technical side as well, but this conversation is specifically geared towards the real world, bottom line, business benefits of accessible websites. Reach more users, boost revenue, and even reduce support costs.

[00:02:46] If you’re a website owner, developer, or digital business leader who’s ever wondered whether accessibility is worth it, this episode is for you.

[00:02:57] If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

[00:03:07] And so without further delay, I bring you Anne Bovelett.

[00:03:17] I am joined on the podcast by Anne Bovelett. Hello Anne.

[00:03:20] Anne Bovelett: Hi Nathan. Thank you for having me today.

[00:03:23] Nathan Wrigley: You are very welcome. Anne and I have been talking for quite a long time before we hit record and we’ve covered a lot of ground. But the ground that we’re going to cover today is all to do with accessibility, your WordPress website and why, well, why you are leaving money on the table if you are not pursuing the accessibility goals that you probably should be in the year 2026.

[00:03:43] Before we begin that, I guess it would be a good idea for you, Anne, to give us your credentials. Tell us a little bit about you and how come you get to speak authoritatively about accessibility in WordPress. So over to you, give us your bio.

[00:03:55] Anne Bovelett: It’s the most dangerous thing to ask me ever, right? Because I always talk too much.

[00:04:01] So let me do it differently this time. When I started figuring out about accessibility, about six years ago, I quickly realised that it’s not that complex to learn accessible coding. It’s not that complex to learn universal design principles. But what is hard for a lot of people working in accessibility is that many of them have this very social way of acting. I do too. I’m in it for the right reason, I think, because I want everybody to have freedom and also the freedom to make the same mistakes that we do, but also not to be constrained in any way.

[00:04:46] And then I was speaking to accessibility specialists, remediators, and in every layer of businesses, and I realised that they were being punched upon by organisations because they were just getting too many roles in one. The expectations were insane. So companies were 2 – 3000 people working for them, outputting I don’t know what kinds of digital products and websites, would expect one person to be the accessibility person to guard the compliance. And I mean this is a recipe for burnout 101.

[00:05:21] And one thing I don’t have a lack of is a big mouth. And one of the reasons why I started working for myself is because of that big mouth. I was not material to be hired, even though I managed to work for 22 years in employment. I realised at some point, if I ask a good fee, for some reason people take me seriously. Have you ever noticed that, Nathan? The more money you ask for, the more serious they’re going to take you. It’s absolutely ridiculous. But that’s what’s happening.

[00:05:59] And so I was trying to find my way in accessibility, like where do I fit in best? And then I thought, I’m going to be the flag bearer and I want to teach companies. And one of the things I like to do is to beat them with their own stick. Because I don’t care why someone makes whatever product, or whatever service they have accessible, I just care that they do. So if the stick that says money works, I’ll beat that. I’ll beat with that. It’s no doubt.

[00:06:35] And that’s where my career started changing, and especially since the past one and a half years. Someone said, you should change your job title. You should turn it into Accessibility Strategist. Well, here we are. I don’t care much for titles, but apparently that pretty much describes what I do.

[00:06:57] Nathan Wrigley: It’s kind of curious to me that if you were to, I say this phrase quite a lot on this podcast because there’s a lot of introspection going on and a lot of gazing back in time. It’s kind of curious that the accessibility bit never got importance from the get-go. And I mean right back from when the internet began.

[00:07:18] There was this great promise that suddenly great swathes of information, which would’ve been hither to unavailable to an awful lot of people, would suddenly be able to be parachuted into your living room via a computer and increasingly, you know, into your hand with a mobile phone.

[00:07:34] And yet the technology developed, the browsers developed, the web design industry developed, and it never got that importance. I’m genuinely puzzled by how that occurred. How it is that we all ignored that. And it really is probably only within the last 3, 4, 5 years that this clarion call for accessibility has become mainstream. I know that there’s people that have been banging the gong probably right from the beginning, but it has been largely ignored and I find that really curious.

[00:08:07] Anne Bovelett: I think that is due to two things. First of all, because people approach this as a purely social issue that needs to be resolved, and that people can’t imagine that they have certain users, which is arrogance at its finest. But, you know, that’s another topic.

[00:08:27] The other thing is good intentions. Like they say, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, right? Because in the beginning of the internet, when things got more colour, I always say this is the point, where things got more colourful, when Google was still small, when Alta Vista was still a thing and Yahoo and you remember, and I think we had four digit or five digit numbers for ICQ members. Actually the HTML, the sites were pretty ugly, right? They were fugly, I would say. I remember we had to build with tables and stuff, and then jump through hoops to make something look the way we wanted to.

[00:09:08] But the thing is, around that time, all we had was semantic HTML. We still have that, but back then it’s all we had. And because we were using semantic HTML, it was great for screen reader users, for example, and other assistive technology. But then everybody always wants to improve. They want to do better. And there is a German word for it, and I haven’t found the equivalent for that in English. We call it verschlimmbesserung. It literally means, instead of improving it, maybe down proving it. It’s like over-engineering.

[00:09:48] So this is what happened. And then people always want to work faster and they love building tools that help others, because in a sense, we are a social species, if you like it or not. We’re just social in the wrong things often, I think as a society. And from that perspective, there’ve been developers that had a great idea, said, let’s make frameworks, and then let’s make things easier for our fellow designers and developers.

[00:10:13] And very fast, at some point, semantic HTML was not a thing anymore because people were coding with div and span. And the div and span are the chameleons, the useless chameleons if you talk about accessibility, because you can make a div look like something, but you can’t make it behave like something until you put a ton of JavaScript on it. Div is like tofu without seasoning, right?

[00:10:41] And the same is with span. And because semantic elements like a button is challenging to style for some, a lot of frameworks came that used div and span a lot. And then they’re relying on JavaScript. And then these frameworks were growing and then at some point people were like, oh, this is the biggest framework used by everybody, so it must be good. That’s like saying the opinion of the majority is the truth. Unfortunately it’s not.

[00:11:15] That is my theory. I’m saying this more often. There was this time when everybody was doing Duolingo and then making big messages on social media, look, I’m on a 682.5 day streak in Duolingo, developers, right? And I’m like, why are you telling me about your streak for that but you can’t remember 50 semantic HTML elements? That’s very much also bashing the developer, which is pretty unfair because the problem is, with accessibility is, it’s not taken into account from the beginning.

[00:11:59] Let me compare that with another situation. So our family home burnt down to the ground and we had to rebuild, and then we got the chance to improve some things because we got modern stuff. And then, because we were building this community seminar centre at the same time, we needed to think about how we’re going to build the toilets, right? And then we had to go, and here, because the architect that helped us, he was nice guy, but he didn’t think about wheelchairs, about accessibility.

[00:12:32] At that time, I wasn’t thinking about accessibility or digital accessibility at all. But I was like, what if someone comes in with a wheelchair? Or what if we have a guest that weighs over 190 kilos? Will our toilet survive that? What kind of toilet do we need? And just close your eyes and go into that little toilet room, bathroom you call it, probably, and then close your eyes and imagine, okay, I have trouble moving, I have pain, I have rheumatism. I don’t but, you know, and I’m on a stick. Where do I put my stick? Do I have a place to put that in the corner? Can I reach for the paper?

[00:13:13] All these practical things. These are decisions that you take before you even start building the room. And it’s the same thing with anything else. Digital applications, terminals, elevators. I don’t know, anything. And the thing is, the better you do it, the less people have to ask questions afterwards about, how does this work?

[00:13:39] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, it’s kind of interesting because in the real world, I know that in the part of the world where I live, and I’ve made this comparison on different podcasts in the past. It’s so self-evident when somebody, for example, who’s using a wheelchair. It’s so self-evident when they can’t get in the building because, well, there they are at the door with some impediment. Maybe there’s three steps that are just unachievable. And it’s really obvious. There they are in the real world. You walk past and you notice it. It’s right there in front of you. Look, there’s a problem that needs to be solved.

[00:14:13] And so for the real world, the legislation in the part of the world where I am, came into effect many years ago. And so, for example, the ramps came in and all the premises that are publicly trading things must have ramps and so on and so forth.

[00:14:26] However, the internet is a different animal in that most of us are browsing in the comfort of our own home. Nobody has any idea what you are browsing. Nobody’s got any idea where it is failing for you because they’re not staring over your shoulder. And even if they were staring over their shoulder, it would be fairly hard for them to determine that, again, to use the metaphor of getting in the building, they wouldn’t see that you couldn’t get in the building even if they were watching your phone. It has to be reported by you, the user that can’t achieve the things. And so there’s this real kind of difficulty in matching it up.

[00:15:03] And also because a website kind of looks finished when it looks finished to most people, then you just put the tools away. There’s the website. It looks finished, so it is finished. We’re done. And of course, there’s this whole increasingly vocal cohort of people who, and we’ll get into them in a moment, who are not able to access these things, but they have to self-report.

[00:15:31] And who do you even report to? If I can’t access a building on my high street, let’s say the local library, I could probably even go to the police in all honesty. There’s a central place. I could go to the police, go to the council, and I could say, this must be fixed. And it, sure enough, it will be fixed. There is no equivalence here. Who would I go to to report a problem so that it will definitely be fixed.

[00:15:53] So there’s this whole sort of strange disconnect, which presents the problem of today. How do we encourage people who don’t get the self-reporting, that it’s a jolly good idea to fix the problems in advance?

[00:16:08] Anne Bovelett: Make it hurt.

[00:16:08] Nathan Wrigley: Or make it valuable, make the fix valuable. And in the scenario that you are describing today, we’re going to talk about some articles, one of which you’ve written, but also one which has been done by accessibilitychecker.org. We’re going to look into those. This is making the economic argument for doing it.

[00:16:26] Anne Bovelett: I’m sorry for interrupting you, but it was not just accessibilitychecker.org because then everybody’s going to go, oh, yeah, another accessibility site. This was Semrush. Semrush people. They did this together with accessibilitychecker.org.

[00:16:41] Nathan Wrigley: Sorry, I’m reading out the URL where I located it, so yeah. But the point being that there’s an economic imperative. And that kind of cuts through a lot, doesn’t it? You know, if you go to a business and you say to them, if we were to make this minor tweak with your business, we could increase your revenue by 0.5 of a percent. If we make these other tweaks, we can increase you by 8%, 9%, or what have you.

[00:17:04] Any business owner who hears those words is going to be curious. Okay, right, you’ve got my attention, now what? And although it kind of misses out the whole moral argument, like we should be making sites accessible just because that’s morally the right thing to do. Put that to one side. Let’s go with the economic imperative.

[00:17:23] So I will link in the show notes to anything that we mention today. So I’ll just drop that in. Go to wptavern.com, search for the episode with Anne, and all the links will be provided there, as well, I might add with a transcript of everything that we say today.

[00:17:38] Tell us the sort of headline pieces that you found curious in the accessibilitychecker.org piece, which is obviously, as you said, created by Semrush amongst others.

[00:17:47] Anne Bovelett: I’m just looking at the first page from Semrush itself. And it was interesting because they actually have an infographic on it that says, summary of findings. That’s not accessible at all, but we used it in our Hackathon project last year. But they tested 10,000 websites. And this is actually what I, and many of the people in my line of work have been waiting for, data, data, data. Because this is what companies care about. And I understand that. You know, they are responsible for people’s salaries, not just the revenue and the turnover, but also for the people that they employ, right?

[00:18:27] And so in this research it showed, after 10,000 websites, that 70% of the sites were not compliant. Well, that’s not news, right? But the thing is, they found a 23% traffic increase tied to higher compliance. 27% more keywords ranked with accessibility improvement. So this is major, but here’s the biggest one. 90% boost in authority score for compliant sites.

[00:18:59] And the thing is, when I read people, wow, we’ve been celebrating last Friday because we had a 0.5 increase in our click rates, for example. That’s another one. I’m like, that could be 10% or 15%. I’m happy to see that it now becomes clear that accessibility affects everything.

[00:19:21] And the thing is, people approach or companies approach accessibility from a technical standpoint. Like, what do we have to change technically? But accessibility is about people. It’s the same thing with all these solutions, the overlays, the whatever. They’re trying to approach it as a digital problem. But this is a human-centric problem. This is how people use the web.

[00:19:48] And now if you go back to SEO, one thing I learned a long time ago, I mean you can tell me about Google and other search engines, whatever you want, I don’t care how technical you are, their biggest customer is the people who search on the web, not the ones who pay them to show their stuff. And so this is what search engines are looking for.

[00:20:16] And now with AI, I’m having a blast because I see people writing stuff like, oh, we have to tell the AI to understand our website. But you are leaving your fate in SEO in the hands of something that is going to interpret what you are doing there.

[00:20:36] I’m not going to name the names. It would be unfair because I’m going to confront them with that before. But, there is a massive event that has a fantastic, big website. I find it hard to navigate, but that’s a personal thing. And that is a JavaScript invested monster. And just for fun of it, I just asked AI, can you find this and this and this for me on that page? And AI was like, no, I can’t. It’s rendering JavaScript. I can’t read this. What do you think that does to a screen reader or, because they’re all using the same technology to read it.

[00:21:10] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. When I’ve done podcast episodes about accessibility in the past, we’ve often dwelled not on this side, in fact, I don’t think we’ve ever touched sort of like the SEO and traffic benefit of it. It’s always been from the point of view of, what can you do? As an engineer, as a web developer, what can you do to go in in the weeds and fix things?

[00:21:28] We are just going to brush that aside. You can find that information out. You know, go and talk to Anne, for example, if you want to learn how to do it. But the principle here is more about the SEO and therefore the traffic side of things, on the flip side of doing the work. So you imagine, the work is not done. It’s poorer in terms of SEO and poorer in terms of reach, poorer in terms of search engine ranking, poorer in terms of revenue through your e-commerce platform or what have you. And then if you do do the work, all of those things increase incrementally.

[00:21:59] And in some cases the data shows fairly substantially. And so I’m just going to drill into each of those statistics one at a time because I feel it needs a little bit of like teasing out a little bit. So the first one is, well, there’s many statistics, but the first of the three that I’m going to mention, which you already have mentioned is organic traffic.

[00:22:17] So again, this is making the assumption that the work has been done. You’ve achieved the accessibility goals, presumably, which were many. You’ve jumped through all those hoops and you’ve got this benefit on the other side. And here’s some possible benefits.

[00:22:29] Organic traffic increased by an average of 23% as a site’s accessibility compliance score increased. So can I ask you, is that one directly related to search engines then? Because it feels like it is. You know, you did the accessibility work and a byproduct of that is that you became more visible on search engines. Have I got that right?

[00:22:50] Anne Bovelett: Yeah, of course because if assistive technology can’t read your site, the search engines probably can’t either.

[00:22:59] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. It’s kind of interesting though that you get that much of a boost. You’d think if you had improved things, you might see, I don’t know, a few percent here and there, but this figure of 23%. I mean imagine saying that to a marketing person, or the growth person inside of a company, 23% is possible. The word average in that sentence is bolded. So it’s an average of 23%. So presumably there’s a few that are lower and there’s a few that are higher, but an average increase of 23%. So I don’t ever use the phrase win-win.

[00:23:32] Anne Bovelett: It is win-win. It’s win-win on sides. Maybe that’s a little bit the dark side in me, but I go to business dinners, meetings, entrepreneur get togethers, blah, blah, blah. And then I always hear, at some point I hear people say, I don’t get it. We are paying our SEO companies so much money, and we are not getting better results. And we have had a redesign on our website. And then I look at their website like, hmm, yeah, sure.

[00:24:01] And then they will fix the site at some point, maybe they will improve the site, where the design goes, where the user flow goes. But still, it’s not ranking better, and still it’s not ranking better. And I wonder when SEO companies are going to become so smart that they’re going to tell their customer, hey customer, stop writing click here everywhere.

[00:24:25] Nathan Wrigley: That’s a great, concrete example of what you’re talking about, because I was going to drill into the next one because honestly, the next point does confuse me a little bit. Again, I’ll link to it in the show notes, but point 4, I’ll just read it here, is websites ranked for an average of 27% more organic keywords with a higher accessibility score.

[00:24:45] Can you tease that out for me? Because I’m genuinely puzzled by what that even means. I’m not sure how there’s this overlap between accessibility compliance, and the keywords and how the search engine would pick them up. So that’s me being ignorant.

[00:24:59] Anne Bovelett: I would say, set the compliance story on fire. Torch it, and throw it away because compliance is what makes people do the bare minimum. And I think, I know they had to use this term in the report because they’ve been checking it if the site is compliant. And then you will get lulled into a false sense of security when your score says, like Google does in Lighthouse, ooh, you are 97% accessible. And like, yeah, but the 3% that you say it’s not, is what’s blocking about 80% of a group of potential visitors that you are not having.

[00:25:40] But again, it’s about, in my opinion, it’s about the way things have been coded and the way things have been written. For example, what happens is buttons that aren’t buttons that are not really saying, how do you say it? It’s the same thing. It’s the read more thing again. I have to be careful that I don’t go into the rabbit hole here too much. But it’s the read more thing. It is text where links are actually named properly.

[00:26:08] And just to give you an example, I see a lot of people who try to do affiliate marketing. Let’s say food bloggers. They make humongous sites. They love using WordPress. I know that. There are tons of plugins also for food bloggers to play out the, what do you call that in English? The nutritional values of this and that. All right. And then these bloggers, people complain about it like, oh, why do they have to write their life stories and that of the spider in the corner on the ceiling before they give me the recipe? Well, that is because they’re trying to get caught in the search engines, right?

[00:26:44] And then they have all these links. Like, someone creates a great meal with a fantastic expensive pan and a pot, and I don’t know what, and they have all these articles from Amazon. And all they have is click here, click here, click here, click here. And then imagine someone who is using that. I mean I love, I have a nice little, what do you call that, extension in Chrome? I’ve been speaking German all morning. This is why my English is so rusty right now. I have this extension and it just, in a big article, if I want to know, oh, what was that tool that she was using again? I’ll go get the link list with that little extension there, or I’ll just run the screen reader and get the link list, because that’s easy for me to do. And then all I see is click here, click here, click here. So I’m not finding the link through that pan, and so I’m not buying it through her link.

[00:27:35] Affiliate websites could make so much more money if they would just do the right thing in their content. Let’s forget about the code of the theme that they chose, just the content. If that is played out correctly, and it’s not some JavaScript generated hoo-ha, which doesn’t happen in WordPress Core, they would make a lot more money.

[00:27:58] Nathan Wrigley: Because I haven’t really been following the SEO industry for a very long time, I really don’t have much intelligence around what search engines these days look for. You know, back in the day when I was building websites, there was a, almost like a playbook that you could go through. And if you did these things, you could achieve reasonable results in SEO.

[00:28:18] And that was the state of the internet 15 years ago when algorithms were less sophisticated, and people were just beginning to kind of get online and use things like Google all the time. But it sounds to me as if we’ve got to a point with search engines, as if they’re able to, I’m maybe going to overstate this, it feels like the more human you have become as a website, the more likely Google will favour you.

[00:28:48] I’m not really encapsulating that very well, but what I mean is, if you put content on there, which is human readable. If you make it obvious where to click to do the thing, rather than stop it with keywords and things which, you know, is not really in the best intentions of humans, that’s clearly done for the algorithm only, it does sound like you are saying that the search engines favour, I’m doing air quotes here, humanity.

[00:29:15] Anne Bovelett: They always have. Let me circle back to what I said before. We, as the people who use search engines, and nowadays they’re AI in whatever they do, we are the biggest customer for them. Because if we’re not there to search, to use them, they can’t sell their services to the people paying to be found.

[00:29:37] I might be, how do you say that, unorthodox in this approach, but I’ve seen it. I have a friend, Manuela van Prooijen, she’s the owner of a company called Weblish. In the Netherlands she trains people in how to set up businesses with WordPress and how to build with WordPress. And you wouldn’t expect it when someone is just focused on that, but she’s got a very broad perspective of things. And she dove into SEO in a way that I’ve never seen before. And some of the SEO experts that I know, and we know together, were like, why didn’t we ever think of that? And it had to do with structured data. And of course, everything she builds is accessible.

[00:30:24] Nathan Wrigley: Okay, so I’m going to pivot slightly. However, I think we’ve made the case that if you are endeavouring to make your website more accessible, I think by reading that piece, you will understand that there are definite benefits in terms of traffic and search engine rankings and so on. So let’s just take that one as a given.

[00:30:43] And then I’m going to move over to a piece which you yourself wrote, not that long ago actually. Almost exactly a year ago, March 4th, 2025. It’s on your website, annebovelett.eu. It’s called The E-commerce Industry’s Billion Pound Mistake. And in here you make the argument, and you bind it to money, to actual dollar terms and things like that, which is quite interesting.

[00:31:05] So I’m wondering if you’d just paint the numbers around what you were saying here, if you can remember. I know it’s a year ago now that you wrote it. But broadly speaking, what was the economic case that you were making?

[00:31:13] Anne Bovelett: It’s actually, this is based on a British report, actually. It’s called the Click Away Pound Report. It was brought in 2019. And that actually measures how much revenue people left lying on the street by not making their shops, their online shops, accessible. And the economic case is, we say in Dutch, you thief your own wallet, if you’re not doing it. And again, these are, this is data, these are numbers.

[00:31:48] So in 2016, for example, the click away pound increased by 45%. Let me just throw around some numbers, right? So in 2016, the money that people left lying on the street by not making their eshops accessible was 11.75 billion. Billion, not million, billion pounds. In 2019, that was already up to 17 billion. Really, I don’t know if they’re going to do another Click Away Pound Report again at some point, but I think we’re going to be shocked. Because since 2019, the state of the internet actually worsened because of all this technology. And it’s getting worse because of all this vibe coding voodoo, where they’re using AI that is trained on inaccessible code. But that’s another thing.

[00:32:45] So there’s another article that I have. I think it is so much money that people leave lying on the street, this is larger than the Chinese economy, that amount. It’s in an article I wrote about e-commerce in 2022, where I was criticising CMSs, including WooCommerce, who actually did a great job. Now WooCommerce Core is now accessible. And said, okay, if your system sucks, the people using your system are going to lose without being able to help it.

[00:33:18] Nathan Wrigley: If you send me the link to that piece, I will obviously add that into the show notes.

[00:33:22] Anne Bovelett: It seems I’m on the cold side of accessibility because that is something that forever stuck with me. Someone called me cold hearted, because I’m talking about the commercial side of accessibility all the time. But, you know, there was a time, this is maybe a strange segway, but there was a time where I weighed way over a hundred kilos. I was so heavy. I had trouble moving, I was in pain, I was uncomfortable. And for me, buying clothes became an uncomfortable exercise. Going into these shops, especially these nice boutique shops, with their very small cabins, you know, trying to turn around and not being able to step into a pair of pants or whatever. Just uncomfortable.

[00:34:13] But the most uncomfortable thing about it for me was that I got blatantly ignored by the ladies that were selling the clothes in the stores. And three years after that, I had lost about 37 kilos. And I came into that one store where it was very, very apparent that they really weren’t interested in talking to me at all. I came in and they immediately jumped me, both of them, the shop owner and her assistant. And I got madder and madder and madder and madder.

[00:34:49] And at some point I said, you know what? Keep your clothes, just tell me don’t you remember me? Don’t you know who I am? No, we don’t remember you. And I was like, well, here’s the picture. Oh yeah, I’ve seen you before. And you know what, the fact, at that time I was thinking, maybe it’s because you’re too busy or you are, you know, I don’t know. But the fact that you jumped me right now with the same amount of people in the place tells me something else.

[00:35:15] Now, why am I telling this story? This is how a lot of people that need assistive technology feel, and also how older people feel on the web. I mean, I don’t know about the UK, but in the Netherlands, you can’t do your taxes without a couple of apps on a phone. Well, if you jump through a million hoops, maybe you can send it in on paper still, but it’s almost impossible. If apps like that don’t work correctly, you’re putting people’s fate in someone else’s hand, because you’re working with their tax number.

[00:35:54] I don’t know in the UK, in the Netherlands, your personal tax number, never ever give that to someone. Never. Your social security number, don’t do it. And then you’re like, maybe 60, 70-year-old, and you’re right before that stage where the technology’s getting too hard for you, but apps to do these things are too difficult.

[00:36:17] There is a local tax office in the Netherlands that had a full accessibility redesign done by Level Level in Rotterdam. And for them, the support requests went down, I think by 30% or something. I couldn’t find the case on their website anymore.

[00:36:35] But this is because people are being empowered to do things by themselves. That’s what they want. And for example, in Germany, there are statistics about that. This is an article that I actually published today that, I think it says like 90% of all German users will always try to first solve something by themselves, and if it doesn’t work they’ll walk away.

[00:36:58] Nathan Wrigley: That’s one of the curious things that come out of the article. The first part of this conversation was all about SEO and what have you. We didn’t really talk much about the person experiencing the problem. It was more about search engines and maybe how you would technically fix things. But this is so interesting. In your piece, you, and I’m just going to quote it because that’s going to be the easiest way to get the information into the record.

[00:37:20] And it says, a shocking 75% of disabled customers have willingly paid more for a product from an accessible website, rather than struggle with a cheaper inaccessible one. And that kind of sums up the whole thing really for me, that if you are faced with a struggle to do something, let’s say, I dont know, you want to buy a widget and it’s $100. The calculus that you are going through is, I could spend an hour and a half trying to get that $100 widget, or I could go to this other website and pay $120 for it and be done in three minutes. Well, that’s obvious, I know which one I’m going to do, which is really interesting.

[00:38:02] Anne Bovelett: Yeah, yeah. And there’s another thing. People are always like, oh, accessibility is only for the blind. No. The people that go forgotten in that, and I have to tell you, disabilities rarely come alone, right? I’m just going to take myself as an example. I have ADHD on steroids. I’m in the spectrum. I’m old. I need two pairs of glasses, one for my computer, one for my regular stuff. I’m starting to lose my hearing in certain regions. I am the target group. If I need to go and order, and I’m B2B, right? I’m a business.

[00:38:41] I will order B2B because then I can deduct the VAT. And I have to buy hardware. And I always try to buy the best. I will go to a store, maybe, and it’s B2B and I will go online. If I can’t figure out their stuff, I’m leaving. If I need to look at a manual, a video manual, that has background music while someone is talking, but there is no subtitles, I’m gone. I can’t follow it. My brain won’t let me.

[00:39:15] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I mean the analogy in my head is kind of, I don’t know, you’re going into a clothes shop or something like that and you need a new pair of shoes or something, and you discover that all the shoes are in a locked cupboard in a corner. And in order to get to the shoes, you need to ask a receptionist for the key. And then they go and find the key, and then they give you the wrong key and the key doesn’t work. And then they don’t point out where the box of shoes is, so you’re completely confused.

[00:39:36] That whole thing is just avoided by going to the next shop along the street where all the shoes are right there for you to pick up and try on and what have you. You’ve made the journey easy, and it turns out that price isn’t necessarily the prime mover here, which is really interesting. I find that statistic fascinating, that people will pay accordingly if they can get what they need out of it. I mean I know it sounds like common sense, but having it painted in those stark colours is.

[00:40:04] Anne Bovelett: Yeah, yeah. This is one of the things I did want to mention as well. I have the privilege of talking to Mark Weisbrod a lot from Greyd. You know him? He’s the CEO of Greyd. I think he’s unique, especially in the world of WordPress because he’s looking at things solely from a business perspective. He’s not distracted by technical issues or whatsoever. He will get it from there. He’s someone who often says to me like, okay, I like the story now show me the data.

[00:40:39] But then at some point, I remember it was before the European Accessibility Act was coming into effect, I think. So this, we’re talking about this in 2023 or something. And then I said, I don’t get it. Why is everybody so focused on the European Accessibility Act? Look at how much money they can make by leaving people their dignity. Because that’s basically what it is by making your stuff accessible.

[00:41:06] If you get past the stupid idea that if something is accessible, it can’t look nice. I mean, go to github.com without being logged in, that’s accessible. It’s a wonderful website. And then I said, where is the common sense? Why, if I talk to the C-suite of a company in one of those business things, and I say, listen, if you would make this and this and this more accessible in your web shop, your turn over would go up by so many percent, why are they not like, we’ve got to invest this money right now?

[00:41:39] And then he said, no matter what, people will always think with their wallet today and tomorrow. They’re not thinking about next week. Only the most visionary leaders in the industries think way more. And this is something I say now, because he said, he was telling me about they were selling, in a company he worked for, they were selling solar systems. And these systems would save the buyers so much money on the long run, but it was very hard to sell them because it was in the long run.

[00:42:20] And if a CEO or a CFO, I mean I know it sounds offending, I don’t mean it that way, but in large corporations it’s to eat or to be eaten. Managers are always afraid of their managers kicking down on them and the others kicking up, and they’re always trying to defend their own spot in the business. It’s only in smaller companies that people can have more leverage. So there are always so many powers at play in a company that if you start talking to a company about, it’s for the greater good of your company, it’s the same argument as it’s for the greater good of humanity.

[00:42:59] And I’ll just give you another number for example. Based on the Click Away Pound Report, and some other data that I have, I’ve been working on building a calculator. You tell me which country your web shop is in, you tell me how much turnover you have per year and then that calculator is going to tell you how much potential revenue you are walking away from by not making it accessible. I did this for very, very big supermarket chain in Switzerland, and the outcome was you could make 0.94% more revenue. And then you’re like, yeah, less than 1%. Yeah, sure. Ah, it’s still 350 million Swiss Francs.

[00:43:43] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. Less than 1% but still that kind of money, wow.

[00:43:47] Anne Bovelett: Yes. And then you get this perspective thing. Because I’m pretty sure the day that this knowledge seeps through to the unions of the employees of this company, the employees are going to go like, why do we have to save money, or why do we not get a raise where you don’t take the opportunity to make that much more turnover? And then someone else with other interests in the company says, yeah, but the stakeholders, you know, or the investors, this is why this is not happening. I mean, we all think common sense is the greatest good in the world. People do not have common sense, period.

[00:44:33] Nathan Wrigley: It’s that sort of invisible layer to people who don’t experience any of the accessibility problems that the industry is trying to tackle. For example, you’re fully sighted, you can use your legs and walk about and use a mouse and use regular computer and use a regular screen and your ears are working fine and all those kind of things. All of that stuff is just sort of hidden from you, and so it just somehow doesn’t drive itself to the front of your consciousness.

[00:44:56] Which is why this is so interesting because, although you said you’ve kind of been berated in the accessibility community for banging the gong about money all the time, it’s a great way to cut through, isn’t it? You can go to the CEO of a company and make the economic argument, I would imagine, much more readily than you can do with the moral argument.

[00:45:16] Anne Bovelett: I’ve been thinking about this a lot, about writing up a profile for a position in companies that I don’t think exists yet. Because normally, we call it the sheep with five legs in Dutch. It’s very hard to find that sheep with five legs. If someone is an accessibility officer in a big company, they are being banged on for compliance. If someone is working on accessibility in a lower rank, they’re getting overworked because people have so many expectations or they just don’t do things.

[00:45:52] It’s always, this person is screaming in the desert like, hey, this is happening. I’ve seen this happen, I was guiding a company with more than I think 13 or 14 development teams, over 85 people, and they didn’t talk to each other. Design, didn’t talk to development, development didn’t talk to development in other areas, because that was how the company was structured.

[00:46:18] And I think people need to be educated in two ways to have this position that doesn’t exist yet. It’s a position where you are able to kick the shins of the C-suite in a professional manner, of course, but also sit down with development, design, and content teams and make them communicate with each other in a way that works.

[00:46:48] And for that, you have to understand these processes. And normally, I’m absolutely not for people in managing positions that know the job that the people they’re managing is doing, because they very often become that, how do you say that, the driver on the carriage running in front of the horses? You know, that’s really dangerous. You shouldn’t interfere into detail level too much.

[00:47:15] But if you understand it on a detail level, from design content and development, you can get these people to talk to each other and help each other. Because there’s absolutely nothing wrong with a developer that sees a design and is like, woah, that design, the way that is made, that’s going to cause some accessibility issues. Those are issues.

[00:47:39] And normally they will just, no, no, I was asked to develop this. I’ll develop it. Instead, you need to raise a culture where people go to the designer and say, hey, I noticed this. What is your thought behind this? And they can’t. And if they had a middle person for that where they could go to and say, look, I got this, I’m not sure about it, then you would have a fantastic flow in a company to make things accessible.

[00:48:06] Because this goes through so much more. So an article that I published today is about how much money you lose in support. It’s the same thing. If a support, people doing support are not used to really listen and someone says, I’m hard of hearing, or someone says, I have dyslexia. When you’re saying, yeah, go read it, it’s on that page on our website. If this person calls you because he couldn’t find, or understand the page, and then you force this person into vulnerability by admitting that he or she has dyslexia. And that is going to leave a very bad taste in someone’s mouth. And what happens? They’re going to walk away. If you’re not some government thing that everybody needs like, I don’t know, taxes, because otherwise they’ll come and rob you.

[00:48:54] Nathan Wrigley: It is genuinely so interesting because a lot of the content that I’ve made in the past has been definitely about the ways to fix your website. So here’s the WCAG guidelines, go figure. This episode’s been really entirely different.

[00:49:07] So first of all, looking at Semrush, and the data. Just sort of painting the picture of the improvements that you can get in terms of traffic and visibility across search engines should you go down the accessibility route. But also then getting into the financial bit, which it sounds like is your thing.

[00:49:27] So I think that’s hopefully of interest to some people who perhaps have just always thought about accessibility as a, I’m a web developer, there’s another job that I’ve got to do. Well, now you’re kind of armoured with things that you could maybe even approach clients with. You know, you’ve got a website, we haven’t looked at it in a few years, you are always looking for ways to make more revenue out of your website. Well, look, I’ve got this thing in my back pocket. This is a really credible way that we can do some tweaks. I know what I need to do. There’s guidelines that I can follow. Let’s do that and see if we can improve the revenue.

[00:50:00] I think we’ve probably covered that. And so with that in mind, Anne, just before we end, I’m going to try and link to the piece that you mentioned. I’ll certainly, anything that we’ve mentioned in this podcast, I’ll try and link to in the show notes on WP Tavern. Do you just want to tell us where we can find you? I did reference your website at one point during the podcast, but do you just want to give us that again, or maybe social networks or something like that where you hang out?

[00:50:23] Anne Bovelett: If you remember how to spell my name, just put it in Google, you’ll find me everywhere. Okay. No. So it’s Anne and then Bovelett, which is B from Bernard, B-O-V-E-L-E-T-T. You can find me on LinkedIn a lot. I’m there a lot because I talk shop a lot.

[00:50:44] Very active on X, Twitter. So that’s where you find me. And don’t be afraid to approach me. Just, if you send me LinkedIn DMs, it can take a while because sometimes I get too many, and then I’m overwhelmed and, yeah. But the best thing is to send me an email. Just go to the contact page on my website.

[00:51:06] Nathan Wrigley: All that it remains for me to do is to say, Anne Bovelett, thank you for chatting to me today. That was really interesting. Thank you so much.

[00:51:12] Anne Bovelett: Thank you for having me and giving me the platform.

[00:51:13] Nathan Wrigley: You are very welcome.

[00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox Podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress, the people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case, WordPress content creation, education, and the unexpected diversion into a pizza plugin.

If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you, or your idea, featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox, and use the form there.

So on the podcast today we have Elliott Richmond. Elliott’s been deep in the WordPress community for over 20 years, developing since the early days, back when WordPress was yet to be forked from b2. He’s freelanced, built with multiple CMS systems, and has contributed creatively to the community, including releasing a WordPress advent calendar way back in 2013.

He is an active WordPress developer, content creator on YouTube, and unexpectedly a part-time pizza vendor running a thriving pizza business powered entirely by WordPress tools.

Many listeners will know Elliott for his technical videos, but today we discuss how WordPress has served as the glue for unexpected ventures, like scaling a local pizza business during lockdown, using WooCommerce, Jetpack, and custom plugins. Elliott’s experience showcases just how flexible WordPress can be, whether for websites, unique ordering systems, or even streamlining business processes for other niches.

Recently, Elliott has been asked by Automattic to create content around wordpress.com, giving him early access to features, and allowing him to share his workflow and insights with a broader audience. He talks about his approach to content creation, balancing scripting versus improvisation, and details his low tech kit from iPhone cameras to DIY lighting.

Throughout the episode, Elliott shares how community connections and feedback loops, especially via YouTube comments, shape his work, and he discusses the new opportunities for content creators within the WordPress ecosystem.

If you’re interested in WordPress beyond websites, curious about how to turn technical, know-how into educational video content, or just want to hear about WordPress powered pizza, and who doesn’t, this episode is for you.

If you’d like to find out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

And so without further delay, I bring you Elliott Richmond.

I am joined on the podcast by Elliott Richmond. Hello Elliott.

[00:03:35] Elliott Richmond: Hello. How you doing? Thanks for having me.

[00:03:37] Nathan Wrigley: You’re so welcome. Elliott and I have had a little bit of a chat prior to hitting the record button.

Elliott’s one of those people who has been in my world for many years, because I’ve been vicariously watching what, this is going to sound a rather sinister. I’ve been watching what Elliott’s been doing for several years. And we’ll get into some of that in a moment. It’s a pleasure to have you on the podcast anyway. I feel like I know more about you than you will do about me, that’s for sure anyway. But welcome to the podcast.

[00:04:08] Elliott Richmond: Thank you. Yeah, thank you for having me. I think if you put yourself out there, you are bound to attract stalking of some form.

[00:04:14] Nathan Wrigley: That’s right. Okay. I hope it doesn’t come across as that.

[00:04:18] Elliott Richmond: No, not at all. Not at all.

[00:04:19] Nathan Wrigley: But will you just give us a little bit of your background? Obviously this is a WordPress specific podcast, so you can dip into your early childhood if you like, but maybe if we constrain it to WordPressy things.

How long have you been using WordPress? What do you do at the moment? And then we can get into some of the fun things you’re going to be doing.

[00:04:36] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, sure. So I’ve been using, or developing with, wordPress for over 20 years. So pretty much as old as WordPress is, but I was developing before that, building stuff. I’m self-taught developer, but I was building stuff in the early nineties for bands and stuff that I was in, creating music and just putting stuff out on the web.

But then I realised, when I was working at an agency, it was a design agency, that there was definitely a market for the web effectively, but the company I was working for didn’t really want to get into it. So eventually when I went freelance, I was able to sort of self-teach myself all of the things I was interested in, which was web development. So I used all of the kind of CMSs like Joomla, Drupal, and eventually found b2 which was forked, ended up being WordPress.

So, yeah, started seeing lots of communities popping up, meetups and I just reached out to people. And I’ve actually featured on WP Tavern before because of releasing an advent calendar I think it was, back in 2013, I think it was Christmas time. And it was basically just reaching out to other developers and asking them for code snippets. It was back in the day when WordPress was kind of, it was a blog but developers were using it in really creative ways like portfolios, and product databases where you had to use the category and tagging system to actually make things work, and then manipulate the templates.

So there was lots of code snippets sort of flying about. So yeah, I just reached out to community and got about 30 developers submitting code, and then just released them as advent calendars.

So, today I am still a developer and develop for WordPress, very passionate about WordPress. I’m a content creator, create stuff on YouTube, and I’m also a part-time Pizzaiolo. And if you don’t know what that is, that’s basically somebody who makes pizzas.

[00:06:22] Nathan Wrigley: I can’t ignore that, and we’re going to get into that in a moment. But I’ve been having people on a variety of different podcasts for over a decade now, and you are the first, actually, that’s not true. I was about to say that you are the only person that I’ve ever interviewed who’s actually used b2 prior to it becoming WordPress. You are not, because I interviewed Matt Mullenweg once, and of course he, along with Mike Little, definitely used b2 because they forked it to become WordPress.

But that really does give me an illustration of, you are right at the beginning. So you were one of the kind of founding members of the community, if you like, and goodness only knows, I’m sure you had no anticipation of what it was going to become.

[00:07:02] Elliott Richmond: No, not at all. Yeah, Kubrick.

[00:07:05] Nathan Wrigley: Old school. If you know what Elliott’s talking about, you can join the, what’s the word for somebody who’s been around in the community for a really long time? Well, anyway, one of those.

So tell us a little bit about the pizza thing. I don’t want to dwell on it for too long, if you don’t mind, but this is such an interesting little story. And curiously, it does have a WordPress spin at the end. So yeah, make sure to get that in as well because that’s fascinating.

[00:07:28] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, so during COVID, during lockdown, my wife and I just started a pizza delivery thing. Because all the kind of delivery shops were closing down and we have a community in our village and it was like, they’ve tried my pizzas before. So we thought, well, we’ll just roll it out and set it up. And people were saying, yeah, send me a pizza. So we thought, okay, well we can sell them to the rest of the community as well. And it was just going to be a temporary thing. Five years later, we employ five staff and it’s still going strong and we sell it as a licence to other people.

But the WordPress thing is, I mean in a million years I wouldn’t know that I’d be doing this five years later, but it’s all because of WordPress that has allowed me to do this. You know, it uses all WordPress products, it’s WooCommerce, WordPress itself, and some Jetpack stuff with the WooCommerce app. It glues everything together and it helps us to run a sort of micro business like that. And what has turned into a weekend, temporary thing has turned into a full-time business. So, yeah, it’s a, I don’t know if I can tell you any more about it really.

[00:08:28] Nathan Wrigley: Well, you can, you mentioned that you’ve got a plugin that’s coming out fairly soon, aligned with people who wish to replicate your pizza business, but in their own locale.

[00:08:40] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, so to just give you the bigger picture, my wife is kind of like a bit of a marketing guru, and she sees opportunities where I can’t see them. She sees all the blind spots. So this whole model can be replicated by anybody. She didn’t force me, I was willing to do it, but she made me film all of my steps to make pizzas. So if you don’t know how to make pizza, there’s a full course to make it. There’s a whole module of the marketing that we use. There’s all secret little tips in there about doing stuff on social media, which I don’t do. My wife does all that.

But I’ve developed a plugin that works with WordPress and WooCommerce and it stitches everything together. So it’s got an ordering system, it’s got a slot system, it’s got a time-based system, so you can only put certain slots within certain times, and then it’s got a radius distance. So if you were outside of that radius based on your postcode, you can’t order pizzas, but you can collect them. And we do get people collecting from miles away that were passing last year, and they’ve driven a hundred miles to come down for the weekend because they’re passing to pick up a pizza. Honestly, you wouldn’t believe it. But I think the furthest somebody’s come is something like 120 miles. It’s crazy.

Yeah, so people have been in touch with me like from, last chap was in Norway asking about his, could he use it for his brother’s bakery? And I said, yeah, absolutely. So anything that’s got like a restricted delivery zone, and maybe you want to just do it at certain times, you can do it. But you don’t even need to use the slot system, but you can set the radius distance. So if you want to do local deliveries, you can set a four mile radius, five mile, ten mile, whatever you want to set. Anything is doable really. Yeah, you can use the plugin.

So that’s kind of like the freemium Pizza Pilot. And then there’s a Pro version that we actually will bundle with our licensees. And we’ve got, it’s not like a franchise, it’s, you know, they buy the whole model once, and then they get the plugin bundled in. And, yeah, I’m just kind of like fine tuning it so that I can manage it. So if pizza does take over my life, I’m still, got my foot in WordPress and developing this product. So I’m happy about that.

[00:10:37] Nathan Wrigley: That’s so interesting that you have WordPress as the sort of fulcrum of this entirely different side of your life, really. And it feels like it’s more than like a hobby project at the moment. It feels like it’s the underpinnings of a lot of what you do, albeit maybe the WordPress community don’t know about it.

But also curious that, and again, I might be reading between the lines, maybe you launch the pizza business and then kind of retrofit your procedures into your own dog fooding plugin, which now you are deciding to sell.

But the fact that the technology stack that you knew inside out was able to facilitate that, you know, and a website can handle things like geolocation, that a website can handle things like payment, and the ability to add ingredients and things like that. All of that enabled you to launch that business, which is just so interesting.

Because most people who use WordPress, I doubt ever have that experience in life. You know, maybe they’re building things for clients, or they try a little hobby project. But you’ve got, I don’t know, it just sort of perfectly slotted in and, well, serendipity seems like the right word. Everything just sort of seems to slot in perfectly, and how wonderful.

[00:11:46] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, I think it all kind of happened at the same time, because I just mentioned to Rachel about, you know, during lockdown these businesses are shutting down and people are going to pivot. Because I was talking to the WordPress community and they were talking about how their businesses were pivoting, like their restaurants. And I said, I could set this up as a website. So it all came together kind of all at once really.

One thing I’d have to say is that I like doing complex things with WordPress, and I’m really interested in the way that people do stuff with WordPress. So we have somebody that comes to our Meetup that is a gardener, and they come religiously to our Meetup. You’d think, well, why is a gardener coming to the Meetup? Well, it’s because they run their whole invoicing system and business, the gardening business, through WordPress.

So it’s like, oh, that’s interesting. So there’s so many different things you can do with WordPress. So the one thing I’m grateful for is all of my experience that WordPress has given me and the opportunities in terms of my career, being able to sell, you know, development packages to clients, and picking up complex jobs in that sense. Because without, it wouldn’t be the glue for the pizza thing, and it wouldn’t have happened that easily.

[00:12:49] Nathan Wrigley: Right. Genuinely, absolutely fascinating. I think we could probably do the entire podcast about that, but there is another story to tell. As I said, I’ve been looking at Elliott online for quite a while and then, I don’t know when it was, but it was certainly quite recently, we are recording this in March, 2026, quite recently that I learned that you are going to be working with Automattic. I don’t know if it’s for Automattic, but certainly for the wordpress.com side of things. I could spoil what you are doing and misrepresent what it is. Probably best to just hand it over to you, and tell us what this gig is, this project that you’ve got running through 2026.

[00:13:27] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, so I have to shout out to Michelle Frechette because she basically reached out to me and suggested an introduction with Stacey Carlson, who is Automattic’s Affiliate and Influencer Director. And she’s obviously picked up some of my videos and she just said to me that, do you fancy us sponsoring a video or two about wordpress.com and how I felt about Automattic products? I said, yeah, why not? I use them all the time, every day. So it’s definitely up my street.

So I put some stuff together and she basically just told me that the Automattic leadership team, which directly is Matt down, were broadly supporting content creators. So yeah, I was on board with it.

And my mind just went on overdrive. Basically, Stacey said to me, would you like to do this thing? And I was like, yeah. She said, okay, well, we’ll have a chat in a couple of days or whatever. And I was like, I put concepts together and I sent about three or four different ideas. And it was like, yeah, okay, let’s do this. And it’s basically how I use WordPress, what I did, the whole pizza thing, what I do from day to day.

And I put these videos together and then it created another opportunity and another introduction to a lady called Brit Solata, who’s head of Influence Marketing. Big inspiration for me is another guy called Jamie Marsland, who’s actually the head of the wordpress.com YouTube channel, because he basically raised his profile by using WordPress and turning hard concepts like using the Block Editor into really easy to understand videos.

And he had the genius idea of creating the speed challenge, which was kind of viral. Again, he lives down the road from me, believe it or not, less than five, six miles away. So there’s a funny story behind that. We’ve known each other for like 15 years, connected through social media and whatever channels there are that we used to use. And we actually met for the first time, face to face, at WordCamp Europe in Greece. And it always tickles me because the first thing he said is like, we’ve known each other for years, but this is the first time we’ve met, and we have to come over the other side of Europe. So it’s not great for our carbon footprint, which always makes me chuckle.

Yeah, he was a great inspiration. And since then we went out for a coffee or two and he inspired me really to start doing my YouTube stuff. And I think that’s really what got me recognised through Michelle, Stacy, and Brit. And then Britt suggested that we do something for the rest of this year. So I’m going to be doing videos about wordpress.com, what’s coming up.

WordPress has always been a moving target. It uses multiple different types of technology, right? So there’s always different things happening and changing. And with the advent of AI, there’s a lot of stuff coming into the whole project. So, yeah, that’s kind of where we’re at.

[00:16:09] Nathan Wrigley: I have a lot of questions around that actually. So the first thing I’m going to ask is, is the intention to make long form content, or are you hoping to make more short form content? And really behind that question is what you just said about the fact that WordPress is in a real period of flux. On the .org side, we’ve got WordPress 7 coming around, which is going to be transformational, but I also feel that any video that gets made to coincide with 7 is quickly going to go out of date because we’re in such a rapid period of flux.

So just conscious about that, really, whether or not the content that you are going to be creating, and forgive me for using this word, is more disposable, if you know what I mean? So the kind of content that you’ll throw together in the anticipation that in 4, 3, 2 months time, you might have to reshoot it again. So, yeah, just wondering what the constraints are on the kind of content that you’re going to be making?

[00:17:01] Elliott Richmond: There aren’t really constraints in that sense, but I think the whole nature of WordPress is ideal for that kind of scenario. So we are going to do long form content and then spinoff of that is going to be the short form as well, because you can just do that with the modern tech that you can use today anyway.

But yes, I think if you’re working in the Core team and you’re doing documentation, and it’s always been a thing, getting documentation out has always been a problematic thing. And if you’re working on something and you’re deep into it, it’s difficult to get that stuff out.

I think over the years it’s got better because you’ve got prominent people in Core, in the team, working at Automattic that are pumping stuff out. Justin Tadlock and the other chaps and Birgit is putting stuff out with Gutenberg Times and things like that. So it has got a lot better, but definitely there is an opportunity for content creators to fill a gap in terms of new things that are coming, what’s going to be changing.

And also the way that people consume that content because YouTube and all the social, other social platforms, not that they’re great, TikToks and all that, but there’s definitely an opportunity for that content to be absorbed by different people. So there’s definitely a gap there for content creators to make people aware about those changes and new developments that are coming to WordPress.

[00:18:22] Nathan Wrigley: I’m in the lucky position in that for this podcast there isn’t really a laundry list of things that I have to cover. It’s very much up to me what I wish to have on the podcast. So you are an example, you know, decided to do this, and here we are doing it.

But I did wonder if you were, you know, you mentioned some names there over at Automattic. I don’t know if there’s going to be some things that they will require you to do because that’s in line with what .com has just released or what have you. Or if you really are, you know, the reins are off, do what you like Elliott and just make sure that you post us and tell us what’s going on.

I’m imagining there will be some sort of guidance and, okay, this thing’s about to launch, it would be really welcome if you produce the piece of content explaining why we’ve done it, and how it works and so on.

[00:19:03] Elliott Richmond: There’s no guardrails in that sense. It feels very fluid and flexible. Yes, there are kind of like things, we’d love you to do this, and I’m more than happy to do that because it’s definitely on my street anyway.

The products that are sort of being talked about are products that I use every day, so it has synergy, you know? It’s not like I’m having to do something that I wouldn’t be comfortable doing. It’s stuff I love doing and I love teaching other people anyway. So in terms of that whole community thing, I think when communities come together, the most I get out of it is actually learning from other people, not just teaching them.

And actually just by teaching somebody, or telling somebody about something, they give you feedback and the feedback loop there is super important, especially for a project like WordPress. Without that feedback loop, potentially, it’s not going to be a thing that anyone will use anyway. So just by doing something with the community or publishing something is useful feedback.

There may be something that is sort of created and developed that I don’t necessarily agree with, but I can still put it out there, say whether I like it or don’t like it, and then ask somebody, you know, what’s your feeling? Have you used it? What’s your feedback? Get some comments. That is feedback. And that’s how you improve things.

[00:20:14] Nathan Wrigley: YouTube is a phenomenal feedback loop actually. I mean, I know you’ll probably be getting feedback from within Automttic and what have you as well, but I long for the comments on a WordPress blog to be like the comments on a YouTube video. It seems that everybody’s quite willing to get the keyboard out and hammer out thousands of replies on a YouTube video. It really does capture that.

And so, especially if during the content you provoke the audience to comment, and to give you feedback, because you may well be making another piece of content, which will be guided by the comments and what have you. I think it’s amazing for that. And kind of like pretty, pretty untapped. Usually when you watch content, it is just, okay, I’ve decided what I’m going to do. There it is. It’s an isolated, atomised piece of content. But the idea of going and asking for, what shall I do next? Or something akin to that is really great. And I hope that works out for you. I fully anticipate that it will, because like I said, the comments are usually fairly voluminous.

[00:21:09] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, it’s interesting because some of the comments actually inspire you to create your next piece of content. So it’s always good. Sometimes it is difficult because you can see that it’s negative feedback. But actually I think that negative feedback is a positive thing because you can respond in a positive way. Or you can just take that feedback and then feed it back into the ecosystem and that’s how things get changed. So any negativity is a positivity in my book.

[00:21:35] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, nice. I think you have to armour yourself with things like that when you go on social media and post content, don’t you? Because it doesn’t matter how perfect it is, and how well aligned it is, there’s always somebody lurking somewhere who is willing to derail your day with a comment like that.

Are you going to be doing this then on official, so you’ve made the content, you’ve created the video, and yada yada. We can get into the process of that in a moment. I’d be kind of interested to know what you do. Are you going to be posting this on official WordPress channels, or is this that you are being hired to create the content and then put it out on your own channels? Or is it, does it come with the official stamp of the wordpress.com YouTube channel or something like that?

[00:22:13] Elliott Richmond: No, it’s on my channel for my audience. So I’m free to do whatever I want really. I can do my own stuff but there is a, kind of an agreement we have to meet certain months and content that will be aligned with whatever’s happening at wordpress.com or at Automattic. But yeah, there’s no restriction. It’s kind of on my channel to my audience.

[00:22:33] Nathan Wrigley: Is it very much then going to be YouTube, like screen shares of the kind of things that you’ve been doing with a code editor or in the backend of WordPress, or a plugin that you’ve installed and have played with or what have you? But obviously on the .com side of things as opposed to the .org side of things.

[00:22:47] Elliott Richmond: I don’t want to give too much away, but I’m given kind of a little bit of early access to stuff that, I found it difficult to find it but it is available, you can get to it, but I needed some pointers. But it’s going to be a mix of technical stuff. You’ve seen my stuff, I’d like to get technical content simplified and I use graphics. And, I mean, if I look at my first stuff, it was nowhere near as polished as it is today. but I like to use animation.

There’s difficult concepts to get over, especially with templating and patterns and template parts and things like that. And if you can simplify that to users, to use this stuff with more knowledge. But there’s also stuff about AI that’s, I mean it even confuses me today, like MCPs and, what’s that? And it’s like large language models and things like that.

So there’s complex stuff that I’m really looking forward to getting my teeth into because I can try and simplify it. And that’s what I like doing in terms of like graphics and analogies. And hopefully it makes sense to people.

[00:23:46] Nathan Wrigley: So it’s going to be, I guess the one word that maybe I would encapsulate it as is educational. The idea is that you come in, learn a thing, or multiple things, and then go away. It’s not just that, oh look, here’s the latest new feature that’s shipping. It’s more, look, here’s the feature, but also here’s how you get to it and how you navigate it and what it does. And if you want to implement it, you must do this, yada, yada, that kind of thing. So educational.

[00:24:12] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, absolutely. There’s lots of other things happening as well that are specifically for developers and not necessarily for wordpress.com. But yeah, engineering those things and putting those together to make something work in the way that you want it to, there is a technical barrier to that. So if I can simplify that and help others to get up and running, then great.

But there’s things like Xdebug that are not enabled by default in the Studio app that I think are really useful. Now I’ve used Xdebug for debugging my code for many years and I honestly cannot do without it. And I didn’t even know it was there, you know, that’s how hidden it was, until I saw a tweet like the other day, and it was, I think it’s recently been rolled out, but I’m like, I am itching to do a video on that, so that I can just let people know how to use it and what it’s beneficial for.

[00:24:56] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, you strike me as the kind of character that’s not going to be short of things to do content about. It’s more, which comes first. And I think that’s such a nice gig for you as well, in that you’re obviously a very curious individual. You know, you’ve been making videos for, this is going to come out the wrong way, but, you know, for no reason, if you know what I mean? You know, there was nobody prodding you with a stick saying, Elliott, we need another video now because you’ve been paid for it.

You were doing it because that’s something that you found enjoyable, and you like the experience of doing all of that. And then somebody comes along and says, you know what? I think we could well do with paying you for this. That must have been kind of, almost manna from heaven in a way.

[00:25:34] Elliott Richmond: Absolutely. I mean, I feel so fortunate. I’m so grateful to Michelle Frechette for reaching out to me and making that contact because, yeah, I mean, it’s right up my street. You’ve seen, I’ve got guitars around the studio and I think it’s like, I’m the sort of person that I think it’s good to learn something new every day, regardless of what it is. And yeah, you have to be intrigued by something.

And particularly with code and technology, it’s changing all the time. You can do things in different ways. Very much the same as just fingering around a fretboard and trying to find that lick, or that nice harmonic tone that you never found before. And you think, ah, I can do this. I’m going to show my bass player that I can do this, or my guitar player, or whatever. You know, it’s a bit like that.

And you get excited about the littlest things that maybe are not so exciting to a lot of people, but they are to me, and that’s why I do it. And if I can just impart that on somebody, that’s a bonus to me. And I do get that feedback on YouTube. So I’m always so grateful when I get positive feedback like that. So, yeah, long may it continue. And I’m not going to stop doing it because I find it fascinating and I really enjoy it.

There are many stages to doing a video. You have to figure out what you’re going to talk about, the script, which I didn’t used to do. It was just kind of like, I know this thing, so I’m just going to jump on. But I now script things, break things down into concepts, and then know when I’m going to do some motion graphics. Then I do the headshots, and then I do the editing.

And when I’m done editing, I’m not done editing in like one day, I just do a couple of hours and I go back into the house and I just tell Rachael, I say, I absolutely love editing. It’s just like, it just really excites me. So it is just these little things. Not necessarily about WordPress, but yeah, figuring out how to get a concept across. And then I’ll sit and I’ll bore the tears off Rachael, try and explain this stuff to her, and she’s just patiently listening to me, you know, so I can get it out of my head.

[00:27:19] Nathan Wrigley: No, I think that’s the most credible way of getting to the perfect simulation of what it is you’re trying to educate people with. Because you trip over yourself, don’t you? And you realise, okay, that second point should have been the third. And the third should have been the second. And there was a better way of explaining that. I think it’s great that you do it that way.

And I’m also, pleased is the wrong word, but I’m curious that you script it as well. Because I know that the temptation is often easy, isn’t it? It’s just, okay, I know this stuff inside out, I’ll just go for it. That extra hour, two hours, three hours, whatever it may be, of disciplining yourself to write it down, I think you go a million more miles with that content. You know, you refine it, you work it through, you cut out the additional words that are not needed, that just sort of demonstrates to me that you are really, really serious about it.

[00:28:06] Elliott Richmond: I say scripted, loosely scripted. It’s scripted not to the absolute T. It’s kind of like flashcard prompts.

[00:28:10] Nathan Wrigley: Oh, no. No, no, no. Sorry. Yeah.

[00:28:13] Elliott Richmond: But there’s the structure, let’s say. And sometimes I do word for word. But if I go off piste, if I’m recording, I’m like, yeah, I’m just going brush over that. It’s not that important. It’s just an um or an ah, or an and and a the that shouldn’t be there, but whatever. I mean, if I watch back some of my stuff, I’m like, oh, did I really say that? I’m my worst critic, I guess.

[00:28:31] Nathan Wrigley: The trick there is never to watch or listen to your own stuff.

[00:28:35] Elliott Richmond: Yeah. Yes.

[00:28:37] Nathan Wrigley: The problem is, if you are self editing, you have to listen to yourself, you know, for every hour that I record, I end up listening to myself for probably about four hours. It is purgatory. For example, the sentence that I’ve just said, I will listen back to and I will be ruing the day that I said it. It’s curious.

Given that it’s on the .com side of things, and if, dear listener, you’re not familiar, we have sort of like this bifurcation, if you like, of WordPress. We have the .org side, which is the way you can go, wordpress.org, and you can download it and put it on a server and put it on your local machine and do what you like with it. And then the .com side, which is where Elliott’s work is going to be mostly living I guess, is the hosted side. So you go and you pay a monthly fee and you have access to WordPress over there, so you don’t have to think about the hosting or anything like that, that’s just taken care of.

Do you get a sense that there’ll be like commercial pressure there? That’s maybe getting to territory that you don’t wish to get into, I don’t know. But will, for example, you have to create content around certain features because it’s shiny and new? So instead of it being educational, it might slip into the more promotional, and I’m doing air quotes as I say that.

[00:29:45] Elliott Richmond: In my experience, little experience working with the guys at the moment, there’s been none of that. It’s literally, you have the free reign, do what you want. There is a benefit of putting a script together in that sense, because you can iron things out if you need to. But in all honesty, of the 10, 15 scripts I’ve already sent through, I’ve only had minimal feedback. They said, great, it looks great. Let’s go with it. And also, if it’s a new shiny thing, show me. I want to know about it. I want to tell others about it as well, you know?

[00:30:11] Nathan Wrigley: Right. So the overlap there is welcome to you, which is quite nice, isn’t it? It’s new, it’s interesting. I would like to mention it anyway.

[00:30:17] Elliott Richmond: There is also another point. I think there’s a misconception between wordpress.com and WordPress, the standalone software. Because effectively it’s the same thing. When you use something like the Studio app, you’ve still got your local files and you can still develop your own stuff. You can get as complex as you want. You are just literally hosting it with the people that make this software. And you then know that you’re going to get the performance, you’re going to get all of the security stuff, you’re going to get all the benefits of hosting with a, on a platform that know the software. So there’s a win-win situation there in my opinion.

[00:30:52] Nathan Wrigley: So you were mentioning earlier, Jamie Marsland, just down the road from you, who’s the head of WordPress YouTube. Obviously kind of a prolific content creator himself, and then got taken on by Automattic to carry on that journey. There’s obviously now you. I wonder if you’ve got any thoughts on how WordPress, and you might read Automattic in here or .com or whatever the right word is. I wonder how you view the seriousness with which they’re taking content creator content.

Because again, if I rewind the clock three or four years ago, it felt that there really wasn’t much coming out that had that kind of official stamp. We were kind of left to our own devices. We were going into Slack and reading comments, or we were going into GitHub queues for plugin developers and things like that.

But it does seem that at some point in the last four or five years, somebody somewhere said, wait, no, video is it. We really have to invest in video. And it feels like you’ve been caught up in that.

There’s no real question there. It’s more just an observation that video content by people who obviously are out in the community doing this with a serious intention. It’s more than just a hobby. It’s something they’ve got a track record of doing seriously. I wonder if you’ve spotted that trend as well.

[00:32:05] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I often look up stuff on YouTube. It used to be Google. How do I, I don’t know, mitre some wood together? You can go to YouTube now and you can find all of this stuff. Or how do you make the perfect naan bread or the perfect pizza, let’s say? So yeah, YouTube is definitely, in the last, I actually don’t think it, it’s always been there, but it’s probably, it’s only become sort of more prominent on my radar, I guess. So if that’s a result of what’s been happening organically, then yeah, I’ve just been sucked into it. But, yeah, I think it’s always been there.

You always get from YouTube content creators about how much more difficult it is, I guess, because there’s more people doing it, so they’ve got less money to give people. But honestly, I’m not in it for the financial reward anyway. I mean, I do get paid ads and stuff, but it’s peanuts every three months, so I’m not in it for that at all.

So yeah, it’s definitely on my radar basically. I mean, in terms of editing and software, I still look up stuff. You know, even whether it’s WordPress or whether it’s command line stuff. Particularly now, if you drop AI into the title, you’re going to get loads of stuff.

[00:33:10] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I mean, more and more if you go and ask a question of Google, you’re going to get the AI answer first, but then you’re just going to get like a big row of YouTube videos. You know, if you ask it a question beginning, how do I, or something along those lines, the AI often comes first.

I’m actually using a different search engine now. I use one called Kagi, which was actually by coincidence developed by the guy who used to run Manage WP, who then sold it and moved on to make this search engine. There’s another success story coming from the WordPress space. But if you ask it a question, you get the AI generated sort of response over three or four lines, and then after that, just a cavalcade of YouTube videos. And it really, I think, has become the default.

What I’m finding interesting about that is, I think that wordpress.com in this case, but you could read Automattic, are kind of putting their money where their mouth is and doing it in an interesting way.

So rather than, let’s say, employing a team of content creators to do this, this, this, this, and this, they’re asking people like you to just get on with it. Just do what you were doing. I think that’s really interesting. And it’s hard to encapsulate what I’m saying there, but there’s a real level of trust. You know that you’ve got to do things, but nobody’s micromanaging you to tell you what to do. It sounds like nobody’s giving you, okay, we want this piece of exact content, and this one and this one and this one. It’s more, Elliott, you’ve got a track record, you’ve proven yourself, now crack on, but we’ll assist from the financial point of view. I think that’s a really nice model of allowing people like you to do what you do, and the trust that you’ve built up is all that was needed to get you started on that journey.

[00:34:47] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, there are kind of, who this is for, what’s good to do, what isn’t great to do. So there is, not guardrails as such, you’re given complete flexibility, but you are given a kind of like a brief, not template, it’s not template, it’s a, what’s this for? What’s the target?

[00:35:03] Nathan Wrigley: Like an avatar kind of, something like that.

[00:35:05] Elliott Richmond: Yeah. Yeah, an avatar. I don’t find that restrictive in any way. If I did, I wouldn’t be doing it.

[00:35:10] Nathan Wrigley: No, that’s really helpful.

[00:35:11] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, exactly.

[00:35:12] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. But you’re given a lot of rope. It does sound like you’ve got a lot of leeway to do what you like. I mean, maybe there’s constraints around, you know, let’s not make content about the UI of Wix or Squarespace or anything like that. You know, that’s probably out remit.

[00:35:28] Elliott Richmond: That goes without saying.

[00:35:29] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, yeah. But certainly from my point of view, doing this podcast, WP Tavern, I can’t really sum it up, but I have that same freedom. I can have who I like on, nobody’s telling me what I can do and when it should be done. It was just a case of, okay Nathan, you’ve done podcasting, we would like you to do this one. And it sounds like a similar kind of offer was made to you, but on the video side. The trust behind that is hard to communicate, but it feels so nice.

[00:35:57] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I’ve always said, because I’ve worked on my own for such a long time, since I was in my twenties, and I won’t tell you how old I am, but it’s been a few decades now, I literally am unemployable. I do work on a remote basis for a company, but it’s on a very minimal tech lead responsibility kind of arrangement. But I could not go into an office. I’m just conditioned not to be, someone breathing down my neck. I’ve just been conditioned to have that freedom and creativity that I love. And definitely without a doubt, I’ve been given this opportunity in the same respect. So I’m absolutely stoked about it.

[00:36:34] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, I think that’s really lovely. You’ve got that history. And I think we see that in the community a lot. You know, you’ve got a history, and it’s your turn to shine, if you like.

Okay, now the nerdy bit, right at the end. I want to know what your process is. Obviously being a content creator myself, I’ve got a whole load of software that I use and I flit around, but I’ve kind of stabilised on a few key pieces of software, which enabled me to do that journey.

I’m sure that there’s going to be people listening to this who have thought to themselves, I too would like to make videos, and I’m curious, what is your tech stack? I mean, we don’t need to go into absolutely everything, but I’m curious, what are the 3, 4, 5, whatever it may be, essential things that are either on your desk, or on your computer that make the whole thing easy and possible?

[00:37:18] Elliott Richmond: My tech stack is so low key, it’s unbelievable. My lights, if I explain my lights to you, I’ve got basically a cat food pouch box, which is like six inches by four with a hole cut out of it, resting on an LED light with a bit of tissue paper over it. It’s that low key, low tech.

[00:37:34] Nathan Wrigley: So it’s like a small shoebox with a hole cut in with tissue paper diffuse the light.

[00:37:39] Elliott Richmond: Yeah.

[00:37:40] Nathan Wrigley: That’s so great. That’s so cottage industry. I love that. Yeah, because you could of course buy the $150 equivalent, but you know, the cat food box is lying around. That’s brilliant. Oh, I hope this keeps going. I hope you got more of these.

[00:37:55] Elliott Richmond: If I could just turn the camera round. And the other thing is just an iPhone. I just use my iPhone. My iPhone is literally sitting on my computer now. So it’s good enough to do what I need to do with it. At some point it will upgrade, but for anybody who wants to do this out there, you know, you don’t need much kit.

In terms of the software, I just use the Notes app and I just jot down my ideas. I actually use the accessibility keyboard shortcut. So I literally, what I do is tap the key and just speak into my mic about the idea that I want to get across. And then that’s my brain dump. And then I’ll take that, read it back, break it down. It’s all in my own words, I then just get AI to polish it a little bit, so it kind of gives me the bare bones of my script. And then that gets me like 60, 70% there. But it’s literally my brain dump that’s polished, and then I repolish it again. So that’s one key bit of legwork that gets me going quickly.

I’ve picked up a lot of kit over the years from just producing music. I’ve got some NS-10s in front of me, studio monitors, so I can do all my sound balancing and stuff. The other key bit of software is DaVinci Resolve, which is, it’s got all of the motion graphics in it. It is a bit of a head spinner to get into it, but there’s lots of resources out there that can help you get to where you want to be.

There’s lots of stuff out there that you can, like library stuff that you can subscribe to and pull in. But I’m always reluctant to do that because I’m the sort of guy that, I want to, even if it’s code, I want to get into it. I want to understand exactly how it works and do it myself. So working with nodes and animation in that sense has been, it’s been a big learning curve, but I’ve absolutely loved it.

And then just the editing is like DaVinci Resolve. And it has everything in it. I pay a licence for it because I want all the whistles and bells, but you can use the free version and I just cannot believe what you can get away with, with the free version. You get all of the motion graphics, you get all of the audio, you get the colour correction, plus all of the editing suite. It’s incredible.

I’m just looking around to see what other stuff I’ve got, but yeah, that is literally about it.

[00:39:52] Nathan Wrigley: I think you’ve encapsulated perfectly. I mean, really you need a computer with a bit of editing software, and there’s many. Some free, some much more expensive. You can certainly pay a fortune for some editing software. But also camera, a little bit of lighting, I guess a backdrop and a quiet room would help. But that’s kind of really all that it takes. The key bit, of course, the bit that you are not mentioning of course is that script bit. That’s where the magic happens.

And people like you are able to turn difficult things into easy to consume things. For people like me who consume it, it all just looks so straightforward and easy. But I’m well aware that in the background there’s probably quite a lot of soul searching and rehashing and rethinking and you were saying, explaining to your wife and re-explaining to your wife and so on.

And so whilst the software and the iPhone camera and all of that are necessary to make it happen, I think the bit which makes your stuff, and people of your calibre’s stuff, stand out is that bit inside your head. The bit which only you can do in the way that you do it, you know? I’m grateful for all the stuff that you’ve done for many years, and long may it continue. You’re carrying on throughout 2026, I think is how it’s framed at the moment.

[00:41:02] Elliott Richmond: Yep, or up to December at least that’s the arrangement. But I’m also allowed to do whatever, you know, my own stuff as well. So if you spot a video about me making pizza or preparing dough, somehow I can thread WordPress into that, I will. I probably can actually because I’ve got a dough calculator.

[00:41:20] Nathan Wrigley: With your pizza plugin, I’m sure that there’ll be ways of getting those messages across. I think we’ll knock it on the head there, as we say in the UK. Best of luck. I’m sure luck is not the thing that you need, but I hope it goes well, and I hope that you enjoy it and that obviously the crowd of people who come along gain a lot of knowledge from everything that you’ve done.

Just before we go, I think we should probably say where we find you online, where that YouTube channel is, or your website, whichever you prefer. Both if you like.

[00:41:46] Elliott Richmond: Yeah, you’ll find me on YouTube, which is elliottrichmondwp. I do have an Elliott Richmond, which is all of my personal stuff, so don’t get that confused with the WordPress stuff. It’s elliottrichmondwp. And you can find my blogs and my brain dumps on elliottrichmond.co.uk. And that is double L, double T by the way.

[00:42:07] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, as I was typing your name in, subconsciously it always ended up with one T. I don’t know what was going on there. But all the Elliots in my life have got a single T. E-L-L-I-O-T-T, and then Richmond, as you might imagine.

If you go to wptavern.com and you look for the Elliott Richmond episode using the search functionality, then you’ll get that episode, I’m sure. And all of the links for anything that we have mentioned, so the YouTube channel and the website, what have you, that will all be in there, one click. Along with a transcript of everything that we’ve talked about as well. So Elliott Richmond, thank you. Good luck with 2026 and thanks for coming on the podcast.

[00:42:46] Elliott Richmond: You’re welcome and thank you so much for having me.

[00:42:48] Nathan Wrigley: You’re very welcome.

[00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox Podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress, the people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case, the interconnected WordPress ecosystem and how to build partnerships and trust.

If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you or your idea featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox, and use the form there.

So on the podcast today, we have Zach Stepek. Zach is what you might call a unicorn in the tech world, having held roles in design development, and much more. His experience spans everything from Cold Fusion and Flash, to JavaScript, WordPress, and WooCommerce. He’s worked with brands like IBM and MTV, in varied industries from medical records to e-commerce, and has spoken at WordCamps, WooConf, and contributed to the WordPress community through both agencies and product companies.

You might know about WordPress, agencies, product companies and hosting, but might not have thought about how partnerships actually work in this ecosystem, or why they matter right now. Zach is here to explain just that.

He starts off by sharing his journey into WordPress, his early challenges, and how an unexpected viral moment led him deeper into the ecosystem.

He describes the three interconnected pillars of WordPress success, agencies or individuals, product companies, think plugins and themes, and hosting or infrastructure, and how each depends on the other to thrive.

We discuss the current state of partnerships, how companies collaborate, why trust and values driven approaches are essential, and why the rapid rise of ROI driven, transactional thinking, is at odds with WordPress’ open source routes. Zach explores the perils of short-term wins, and the value of nurturing long-term, mutually beneficial, relationships especially as economic uncertainty and the changes in the broader world are beginning to reshape how companies interact.

Then we talk about the challenges faced by hosting companies, the role of product companies in innovation, and how agencies often bridge these worlds. Zach makes the case for cultivating relationship equity, not just revenue, and how a rising tide can lift all boats, if the community keeps its collective focus.

Towards the end, we discuss how the landscape has changed. Why community contributions matter more than ever, and what the future might hold as WordPress partnerships reach an inflexion point.

If you’re curious about how these invisible partnership threads bind the WordPress ecosystem together, and how true partnership drives success, this episode is for you.

If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

And so without further delay, I bring you Zach Stepek.

I am joined on the podcast by Zach Stepek. Hello Zach.

[00:04:00] Zach Stepek: Hey Nathan, how you?

[00:04:01] Nathan Wrigley: Zach and I have been talking for a fairly lengthy period of time, probably close to an hour or something like that. And we’ve strayed into a variety of subjects, none of which have been related to this podcast, but it’s been very enjoyable. He’s a thoroughly sociable and humorous chap, let’s put it that way. So I’ve appreciated the last hour. It’s been an absolute bonus. You’ve cheered me up no end.

However, the listeners to this podcast, they may not know about you. They may not know what you do, or what you have done or whatever it may be related to WordPress. It’s a banal question, but I always like to introduce the podcast with it. Will you just tell us about yourself?

[00:04:36] Zach Stepek: Yeah, so I am what you would hear referred to in the industry as a unicorn. I’ve been in multiple roles, from design to development. I started my career as a Cold Fusion developer, moved into Flash back in the day. Taught the Flex Framework everywhere from IBM to MTV. Spent time doing the teaching thing for about five or six years as an Adobe Certified Instructor. And then the bottom fell out of that industry, because of a letter that was written about Flash that you may remember.

All of my contracts disappeared overnight. Within a week almost a million dollars worth of potential revenue had been cancelled. Back then I was very nice with my out clauses in my contracts, and I learned a very harsh lesson. Spent a year working support at a company that may have had something to do with the collapse of my industry, working for their care division and learned about the support industry there while learning new things. And one of those new things was WordPress.

I worked as an Experience Designer at a medical, an electronic medical records company, working on the design of their EMR software for a while. And then worked at a company called Comply365, where I dove deep into JavaScript and did a lot of demos of their forms platform, which is used by airlines all over the world to do the submission of service forms for aeroplanes.

The company actually started as a way to get rid of the giant binders that pilots used to carry that had the manuals. The company started as a digitiser of that material into a tablet application that pilots could carry in the pocket of a briefcase rather than it being a briefcase itself. So worked there.

Throughout the years I was working on WordPress. I had been involved in bringing a record label back to Rockford that had folded. Rockford, Illinois is where I live. And we built a WooCommerce site to sell digital music. And that was my first exposure to WooCommerce.

Went on from there to work at a company and organisation called Oscar Mike and the Oscar Mike Foundation, which helps injured veterans participate in adaptive sporting events. They are a great organisation that had a WooCommerce website that was failing under traffic. In fact, the way I got that job was I knew the founder, Noah. And Noah had called me on Thanksgiving during dinner with my family. And he said, hey, I need your help. My website is down. And I said, okay, where is it hosted? And he said, I’m not sure.

So four and a half, five hours later, we got the site back up. The problem is, he had been featured in an interview during an American football game. The interview was aired during the Thanksgiving Day game between the Green Bay Packers and the Chicago Bears. And so, you know, classic rivalry, the interview had happened in the Chicago Bears Locker room set, and was aired on TV all over Chicago. And so they were getting hit by a ton of traffic, and they got 14 orders before the hosting that was supporting their site died.

[00:08:29] Nathan Wrigley: It went viral. One of the first examples of going viral.

[00:08:32] Zach Stepek: Exactly. And so they got 14 orders and then the server just stopped. And so I had to do root cause analysis, and figure out what had happened. And we determined that it was because the email spool, because there was an email server on the same server as the web server, had filled with the new product order emails from WooCommerce. And because the server didn’t have a lot of power to begin with, it was a small VPS that had been donated to the organisation. Very grateful that that had happened because that was what got them started. But it was never designed for the level of traffic that they had received. And so after those 14 orders, delivering three emails a piece, the server ran out of memory because the email spool ran the server out of memory.

And when a server runs out of memory, it causes a cascading effect that basically took down the website and everything related to it and hard crashed the VPS so that it could not recover. We didn’t have a login to go in and reset the VPS until four and a half hours later. So the window of opportunity had already closed by the time I had the login information, could reset the server, and we figured out what was going on. That led to me working there.

Worked there for a little over a year and a half. And I fell in love with WooCommerce and WordPress through that process, and ended up talking about that site at WordCamp, Milwaukee, 2015. And at the time Patrick Rauland was the Product Manager for WooCommerce at WooThemes, and he flew from Denver to Milwaukee to see my talk. And that led to a relationship with the WooCommerce team that has not stopped since.

So it was really, really cool. I got to speak at WooConf as a keynote speaker in 2017. I had started an agency that started out small and became a force to be reckoned with in the three years that I was with it. Pivoted out of that for reasons that we don’t need to get into. And then moved into the hosting space, and I’ve been there since.

And in that space I’ve been focused on partnerships. So as of today, I am a freelancer who is doing fractional work in the partnership space and also doing some work on WordPress websites again, so WooCommerce sites and the like. Making recommendations for hosting infrastructure and stability for scaling those sites.

[00:11:17] Nathan Wrigley: That is such an interesting story. I mean, you’ve run the gamut of all of it really. And dear listener, there are so many other stories that could be filled in in between those things because Zach’s got a lot going on outside of the day job and the things that he’s just described, there’s an awful lot of other things going on as well. So what a rich and interesting life you have had.

I hate to drag it back in a way to what we’re going to talk about, because given all of that exciting stuff, this may seem, you know, a little bit dry. But we’re going to get there because Zach wants to talk to us today about partnerships basically.

Just for the listeners Zach, this isn’t for your benefit, this is for the listener’s benefit, I think it’s fair to say that a lot of the people listening to this podcast, we’ve got developers, we’ve got people who have been in the space for years and years and years, but I get quite a bit of email and a lot of it says, you know, I’m new to WordPress and that kind of thing.

And they really don’t know that events take place, that there’s this whole tapestry of people interconnecting, and hanging out in the real world. And that some of the companies that they may have heard of, they partner up with other companies. So plugin companies might partner up with hosting companies that then do other different things.

Do you just want to paint a bit of a picture of what a partnership is in the WordPress space in 2026? Now I know that’s a very open-ended question, because there’s no two that’ll be alike, but just give us an idea.

[00:12:37] Zach Stepek: So I like to divide partnerships into two types. One is the relationship between creators or builders or agency owners, and the hosting companies that they use to host the websites for their customers.

And the other, well there’s two forms of the other, and that is product companies that build products around WordPress who partner with either agencies or hosts.

I’ve been writing a lot on LinkedIn lately about how I feel about partnerships, and part of it was this pivot into thinking in terms of ecosystems. And I’m not the first one to say that. Jonathan Wold has been saying that for a few years now, how WordPress is an ecosystem.

But there are basically these three layers that are interconnected and work together, right? And so for most successful site builds, you have either an individual or an agency who’s building the site. You have the product companies that build the software that is layered into WordPress that powers the site, whether that’s a theme like Ollie or Kadence, or a plugin for anything like Gravity Forms for forms or for Formidable Forms, or any of the other forum companies who will be really upset I didn’t mention them by name. Or an SEO plugin or any of these other ancillary tools that make WordPress more capable.

And so those two things, the agency and then the products need to work in harmony because the agency needs to understand the products well enough to implement them, and the product companies need to understand the agency’s needs well enough to serve them through their products and through support for those products.

And then there’s a third layer, and it’s a layer that a lot of people think about in terms of more a vendor relationship than a partnership. And that is the hosting side, the infrastructure. When you start a company and you’re a retail company, one of the first things that you do is you go out and you look for where you’re going to put your retail store, right? And so you look for real estate.

You want a couple of things. You want high traffic areas that can handle bringing you people, and that can also handle the amount of people you’re going to just get naturally, right?

So you’re looking at things like traffic numbers that are going to go past your retail space. You’re looking at, population density, all of these other things. And where are you going to advertise in town? How are you going to be bringing people to you?

And the internet is very similar in its structure to what we do for a physical retail store. So your infrastructure, your hosting is like the address that you’re putting your retail store at. And so if you skimp on hosting and you go for somebody who offers $3 a month for unlimited websites, you’re putting yourself in the cheapest rent you can possibly pay for your storefront. And by doing so, you’re not going to have the ability to handle the same traffic as say, a location on Madison Avenue in New York might be able to. It’s different, right? It is a different setup. You could be on, in the Miracle Mile in Chicago. That’s great retail space. It’s incredibly expensive, but if your business can support it, that’s the place to be.

There are some other parallels we can talk about with some of the SaaS companies like Shopify that have created almost a mall. Because they’ve created this payments platform that allows them to expose stores to people, right? So shop pay will give you suggestions of other things that you can buy if you open the shop app on your mobile device. So it has a built in kind of discoverability, but that discoverability comes with a price. And that price is a percentage of your business forever. Even on their high end tiers, they still are getting a percentage of your business on Shopify Plus. That’s just how they make money.

So all of that to say, there are parallels between how we host a website and how we might position a retail space, right? So premium hosting is a big deal. It’s a huge deal, especially in e-commerce where scale matters because every visitor is a potential sale. Every sale is the only way your company makes money, right? The impetus of e-commerce is transactional. It is, somebody comes to your store, buys a product, you ship it to them, they receive it, and you have completed your contract with them to deliver the product that they asked for.

Because of that, if they come to your website and your site fails because you’re getting too much traffic, for example, it’s akin to if you were walking through a Best Buy and as you’re walking through the store, things around you just start to deteriorate. If you were walking through a store where the products you were looking at just stopped existing for fractions of time, like how long would you stay in that store?

[00:18:12] Nathan Wrigley: Or you couldn’t quite pick the box up. You could get your hands on it, but then everything just stopped. You couldn’t lift it off the shelf. Yeah, that’s, you wouldn’t stay long is the answer.

[00:18:22] Zach Stepek: No. No. And that’s the same thing that happens with bad infrastructure for e-commerce sites. So that’s that third pillar of partnership and what makes a successful WordPress site.

[00:18:33] Nathan Wrigley: Can I just ask a quick question around that? So before we penetrate deeper into that. So you mentioned these three things and you’ve got the, and you did them in that order. So we had agency, or that could be an individual, I guess, but let’s go with the agency word because it’s easier. Which then has some kind of relationship with the product companies. So themes, plugins, whatever that may be. So that’s the second tier, if you like. And then there’s the third tier, which is hosting, stroke, infrastructure. But let’s, again, let’s just call it hosting.

So you listed those things in order, but I’m imagining, and I could be wrong, that instead of it being like a layer cake, it’s more of a kind of an overlapping Venn diagram. The three things are in concert with each other. So a triangle if you like. So the agency, whilst in your description, it’s kind of next to the product company, well it’s also next to the hosting and infrastructure side of things as well.

In other words, the partnerships that we’ll get into, it’s not bound from layer one to layer two, and layer two to layer three. Three goes to one, two goes to three, and so on. Have I encapsulated that right?

[00:19:35] Zach Stepek: Yeah, think of it almost as a Celtic knot, right?

[00:19:38] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, okay. Go Google that, dear listener.

[00:19:41] Zach Stepek: It’s this never ending connection of multiple pieces all forming a whole. And the interconnected nature of it doesn’t end, at least when things are working well.

There are product companies that have terrible support. There are infrastructure companies, hosting companies, that have terrible support. So those things, there are agencies that have terrible support, I mean this is not something that is only relegated to the product and hosting companies. Every layer has the potential for having pieces fall apart. The strength of the whole is only as strong as the weakest of the parts in the partnership.

[00:20:22] Nathan Wrigley: That’s fascinating. So we’re imagining that these things are not just overlapping, they’re holding each other together. And at this point I’m kind of imagining almost like a bubble that you blow with those bubble kits that you get as a child. The whole thing is, those three things are holding that bubble together, but it just takes one of them, the little pop with the needle and doop, the whole thing sort of comes apart because, they are the underpinnings of each other. That’s really interesting.

Can I just make an observation at this point? And again, you can rail against it or agree. I don’t know where you’re going to go. It feels like the revenue side of those things, the giant if you like, in the room there, the one that traditionally seems to make the money, all the money, most of the money, lots of money, is the hosting infrastructure side of things.

And then the two other layers, you know, the product companies, the theme companies, the plugin companies, whatever. There are a few examples that escape velocity and managed to pull away from the earth’s gravity, you know, Gravity Forms might be a good example in fact, who have that trajectory, but they’re big. But the rest of it is just lots and lots of much smaller entities. So thousands, many, many thousands of smaller entities with a single theme, or a collection of plugins, or what have you. And the same, I think would be true for the agencies. Just lots and lots of that spread out.

So in terms of demographics, the hosting companies, that seems to be a small number, but they make lots of revenue. Whereas the other two, the agency and the product companies, large numbers, all making less revenue individually, potentially. I know I’m drawing a lot of parallels that maybe are not necessarily going to hold up to scrutiny, but you get what I mean. That’s quite an interesting dynamic, because they’re relying upon each other and yet in some situations, you have a few players which might be able to punch above their weight because of their bank balance and the size of their business.

[00:22:11] Zach Stepek: No, absolutely. I mean we’re all familiar with the larger WordPress VIP level agencies, right? They’re the people who are out there in the community giving back the most frequently a lot of the times. So, you know, you see companies like Fueled who now has 10up as its WordPress practise within Fueled, right? And Fueled gives back a ton of open source technology just to the community.

It’s stuff that they built to serve their customers that they’ve given back to the community, because Jake has always been a good steward of the WordPress community in general. So he understands and recognises that the true benefit of an open source platform like WordPress is not only the things we can create on top of it because we have access to the code, but the community that can be created on top of the solutions we create.

So look at something like ElasticPress as an example. ElasticPress is an open source tool that also has been commercialised into a hosted product by Fueled. And it replaces search in WordPress with something that is much, much better, right? ElasticSearch is much better at searching indexed content than SQL is at searching a relational database for anything within it.

It replaces something that is a bit of a hole in what WordPress can do with something that is better. And they gave it to the community. They gave it to the community, because it’s based on open source server software. So it made sense for the plugin that enables the use of this open source server with this open source CMS to also be an open source plugin. And because of that, they have community members that contribute back to the ElasticPress product when there are bugs that they find, and solutions to things that they find. And they have a constant feedback loop of how to improve their product.

And that all happens because they decided to be good stewards within the WordPress community. They’re not the only ones. There are many. WebDevStudios just released Theme Switcher Pro. If you haven’t heard Brad talking about Theme Switcher Pro yet, you haven’t been on the internet around WordPress, because are absolutely right to be marketing what they built.

It was, again, something that was built around a need. They saw a need for an easier way for people to move from where they were with classic themes, to block-based themes more gradually. So in large enterprises, it’s sometimes hard to just wholesale replace the theme of a website. So they built a solution that allowed you to replace parts of it, a little bit at a time and move to a block-based architecture over time rather than all at once.

And so these companies are building tools around what WordPress can do to fit needs that they’ve found working with their customers. So in these cases, the agencies become the product companies, right?

And then there are product companies that, they were built around solving a need. Things like Gravity Forms, or other form plugins, that were built to solve the problem with form submissions in WordPress. And all of these things are all participating in the same ecosystem, right? But if you build a site that has 75 plugins installed and one of them doesn’t play well with others, the whole thing comes tumbling down.

[00:26:01] Nathan Wrigley: Oh, that’s a good analogy.

[00:26:02] Zach Stepek: You look at that, and the reason we’re, that I’m focused right now on ecosystem building and on building this, a network of people who want to work together is because a rising tide lifts all ships, right? We want WordPress to continue growing as an ecosystem. And like you mentioned, hosting companies tend to be the ones with the most money in the room. That’s not always the case, but they make a good amount of money on hosting.

And I think that hosting companies have a responsibility to be good stewards to the community in the same way that I just talked about WebDevStudios and Fueled being good stewards of the community.

And so hosting companies are in a unique position where they can drive these values based partnerships that allow for agencies to meet product owners and product owners to meet agencies who are all part of their partner programmes, right? They all can invest together in their mutual success.

Values driven partnership is a long game, right? It’s kind of the difference between planting a forest and picking apples off of a tree. If all you want is the apples, you just strip the branches of all the apples and you move on. But if you’re planting a forest together, you’re thinking about ecosystem, right?

So in the best partnerships, both sides are invested in that mutual success. You care about your partner’s customers, their teams, the reputation they carry in the community. Revenue matters, but the revenue is just the result of doing all the other things well.

[00:27:45] Nathan Wrigley: There’s so much to unpick here and I’m going to try and do some of that. So you’ve got this rising tide carries all boats thing, which I think is so important. We forget that at our peril.

But also I want to use the word synergy, where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. You know, WordPress is so impressive because all these three layers, the agency, the product, the hosting company, because they’ve got overlapping concerns and it’s just over the last 20 odd years, it’s worked somehow.

Often on this podcast I say, I want to rewind, and that’s what I want to do. I just want to rewind back 22 odd years. There was no playbook for how this would turn out. We didn’t know that any of those three layers would exist. We didn’t know that there would be a thing like an agency, that there would be a freelance web developer, that that would be a thing. These industries didn’t exist.

We didn’t know that product companies would pop up because the plugin architecture and the theme architecture in WordPress would enable that, and it was okay to exchange money for those things. It turned out that was a thing with WordPress that you could do that other CMSs kind of pushed back upon. And then that hosting would become the bedrock of that whole thing as well. We didn’t know that.

And 22 years later, with a lot of agreement, but a fair level of disagreement, I imagine along the way, those three pillars, for want of a better word, they’ve evolved and they’ve become what they are now. We are recording this in the year 2026, and I feel like there’s a change that’s happened at some point. I don’t know when it was, but it feels like that synergy, that unwritten, and yet completely understood by the WordPress community, that unwritten, unspoken, contract, in many ways. It feels like that’s maybe disappearing a little bit.

I’m probably overemphasising that, but do you sense that a bit? That the maker taker thing is kind of skewing it. That money has become such an integral part of the WordPress project, so many lives bound up with the money, the revenue that’s generated by the company that they work for and what have you, that it’s so easy to lose sight of that bigger piece. The rising tide carries all boats.

And instead of the rising tide, what we’ve got is circling the wagons. You know, looking out for ourselves, and making sure we’ve got what we need to survive. And of course, just forgetting, wait, the very fabric, the foundations upon which our business is built, we must maintain that in the next year, in the next two years, in the next five and ten years, otherwise we’re just, well we’re standing on sand, we don’t have a firm foundation. There was a lot there and there certainly was no question, but discuss.

[00:30:26] Zach Stepek: No, so what we’re seeing is this move toward, it’s unfortunate because I see it happening in a lot of companies right now. Where they’ve taken on investment. They no longer are fully in charge of their own destinies, because they now have people to answer to that want to get a return out of the money they’ve injected into the WordPress community.

And the only thing that private equity generally sees is the dollar, or the pound, or the whatever your local currency is, right? That’s all they see. That’s all they see. And when you talk about an ecosystem of interrelated, interlocking pieces that all have to work in harmony, and then you have a force that’s in an industry that is interested only in transaction, that is at odds with how an open source community is built, right? So taking things to a transactional level only chases short term wins, because that relationship only lasts as long as you can continue to squeeze money out of it.

[00:31:37] Nathan Wrigley: It is such an interesting juxtaposition with broader society. So you live in the US I live in the UK. We’re both democracies, and we’re both capitalist democracies. And from a very early age, the subliminal message being delivered to all of us is, work hard, produce things and just see what you can get out of it all. Charge what the market will bear, and the rest of society will figure all of that out. The market is the thing, and somehow it’ll all beautifully work and balance.

This is so different to that. This is something else. It’s some, there’s a philanthropic outside to it which, it’s very hard to encapsulate, but the whole 22 year history of it is built upon the shoulders of many, many thousands, tens of thousands of people who didn’t necessarily have that as the basis upon which they were working.

You know, there was a lot of philanthropy, a lot of volunteer time, for want of a better word. And so projects like WordPress, it feels like, if the only metric for success by a WordPress company is going to be ROI for whatever reason, you mentioned having to repay the venture capitalists or what have you. But if ROI is the only metric upon which anything is based, you aren’t thinking about the rising tide carrying all boats. You are just thinking what’s the next month going to do, and what’s the next month going to do?

And again, I haven’t got a question in there, there’s just an observation. But there’s something intangible there. There’s something that our ecosystem requires in order to survive that it feels is harder to, conjure up in the real world in 2026 than it was say in, I don’t know, 2017 or something like that.

[00:33:24] Zach Stepek: Yeah, well, and here’s the thing, okay. When you focus on these short-term wins only, and you ignore the potential of long-term partnership and of ecosystem building, you lose out on potential revenue because of shortsightedness, right? If all you’re trying to do is close the next sale as quickly as possible to make people who don’t really know your business happy, then you’re losing sight of the potential that comes from investing in long-term sales.

And agencies understand this, especially the more enterprise focused agencies who have sales cycles that are 12, 18, 24, sometimes even 36 months long. So when these companies start to put profit ahead of people, ahead of partnership. When profit is the priority, then anything they call a partnership programme is really just a house of cards. It might stand for a while, but it’s fragile. And when people get treated like line items instead of collaborators, that trust erodes very quickly.

When every conversation becomes transactional, everyone, every layer that we talked about starts to just focus on protecting their own interests. And the irony is that the strongest growth comes from the opposite approach, right? When partners focus on people, they focus on shared wins. Those successes create real social proof.

And then the community sees it. And the customers see it. And that reputation, that long-term investment in the community as a whole, in the ecosystem, is more powerful than any potential short-term revenue spike. Trust and reputation compound over time. It’s not something you develop in a single conversation.

And then the other thing that’s really important about this is what the community perceives, right? Love it or hate it, the WordPress community is very harsh to companies that they see as just trying to eek out profit without giving back, without doing the things that are required to support the very ecosystem that allows them to make money. And so community perception is hugely important, and that perception drives long-term growth. Short-term thinking damages your brand equity, long-term thinking builds it.

Trust, in this case, is the durable asset, right? It’s not what your MRR is or your ARR is. Those things are important because they allow you to support the business and the livelihoods that you are supporting as a company. But trust is the most important asset a company has. And when that starts to erode because the company stops acting like it used to, before the injection of capital, and starts acting like a business that is focused on only its capitalistic pursuit, trust starts to degrade, and then eventually it’s just gone.

[00:36:43] Nathan Wrigley: I’m imagining like a, I often like to kind of encapsulate things in my head and I’m kind of imagining a really tall skyscraper. And the scenario that you are describing is more death by a thousand paper cuts. It’s this slow erosion of that building. You know, imagine that building where the way that you’ve just described things, you might be removing one brick one day and then you come back another day and take a couple more. Before you know it, the whole thing starts to look shaky.

So it’s not that giant, swinging wrecking ball that’s coming and in one hit has just demolished the whole thing. This is a slow, but potentially with a certain critical momentum and enough steam behind it, enough erosion of the fabric of the whole thing that it’s inevitable. Unless the brakes are put on, that slow erosion, the building will fall down.

I’m wondering if that’s more a consequence of where we are at. And I don’t mean you and I or even the WordPress community. The confidence in economies worldwide, and the nature of what’s going on in the broader world, I wonder if those kind of concerns play in.

So you know more about the corporate side of WordPress businesses than I do. I don’t know what is happening at the top tier of a lot of those bigger businesses. The sort of third tier that you mentioned. I do wonder if there’s a more, how to describe it, bean countery kind of approach to businesses.

I wonder if the calculus is much more now, what is the ROI? If we don’t see ROI, it’s not happening. Whereas in the year 2017, it would be, what’s the ROI? Well, yeah, we’ve got things which we can say we’ll make a profit from that, but we’ve also got the long bets. We’ve got the community side. We’re going to fly people to that event. We’re going to sponsor that person over there, two days a month because we know that they’re contributing to Core, and that’s part of this bigger rising tide carries all boats metaphor that we’ve been using. I don’t know if it’s true, but I wonder if the state of the world that we’re in, I wonder if that contributes a bit to it.

[00:38:42] Zach Stepek: I think it does. I think there’s a lot of fear right now because the economy has not been as strong as what it had been in the past. We all dealt with a period of extreme recession. And despite some governments not wanting to say the word, right? The COVID-19 pandemic caused a shrink in economic factors across the board. And it was inevitable that that was going to happen.

Some countries were hit harder by inflation as a result of that than others. But it’s a reality that we’ve all had to deal with, because demand for things went up and the supply went down because the workers simply weren’t there to make the things. And that’s just basic economics in a capitalistic society, right?

So, yes, there’s a lot of fear. There’s a lot of fear that is causing businesses to make decisions that they wouldn’t have, you know, as you mentioned, just eight years ago in 2017. And all you have to do is look at the sponsorship page on any WordCamp or any tech event. Even events as large as CloudFest. Look at the sponsor pages. Look at who’s there and compare it to what you’ve seen in the past.

The numbers are dwindling, right? The people who are willing to continue making those investments are dwindling. Companies, whether they are product companies or agencies or hosting companies, but especially hosting companies this year, are deciding not to send people to events. They’re just not. I have heard from multiple people that work at hosting companies that are not leaving their home countries this year. It’s a belt tightening across the board.

But I understand that there’s a desire to tighten the belt and make sure that the company can survive through this current economic shift. And for hosting companies that own their own infrastructure, and even those who are renting infrastructure from a hyperscaler like Google or AWS, there’s a very scary thing on the horizon that we’re seeing, and that is the shortage of components for building servers.

And there’s this little thing that is an artificial term called Artificial Intelligence. They’re large language models people, they’re not Artificial Intelligence. There’s no intelligence there. They’re just regurgitating things they have read and digested, right? But these AI companies, these large language models take a tremendous amount of processing power.

And I’m reminded of the first time that I visited a data centre. And I was in the data centre and across the aisle from what I was there to see was an AI company. And they had their servers there and the data centre had to retrofit additional cooling for the area where those AI servers were running. Whereas you could probably just wear a T-shirt and be fine in a data centre, in most cases. If you were in that area without a coat, it was bitterly cold, because there was just so much air that was chilled air being shot at these machines that were filled with graphics processors that were generating massive amounts of heat.

And so you think about that, and you think about the level of hardware required to generate that amount of heat out of a simple server, and the difference in the number of components, the amount of RAM, the amount of processors, the number of graphics cards at $2,000 a piece that have to go into these massive beasts of servers. And the component shortage has a lot of hosts scared too. Not a lot of them thought in advance to buy a ton of RAM and a ton of processors, because we’ve never had a true supply shortage in that area except during the pandemic.

And at that time, everybody was slowed down. Now, nobody has slowed down. Demand is higher than ever before for hosting, and the infrastructure just isn’t there to support it. So as the prices of things like a stick of memory have gone up, the cost, the raw cost of hosting will go up too. And we’re just starting to see the beginning of that effect. But I think that companies that were built on $3 hosting are going to very quickly find that their model is no longer supported by component cost.

So yeah, there’s fear. There’s fear that is causing people to make decisions that are focused on revenue rather than relationship. And I think it’s incredibly shortsighted. I understand it. I get why fear is such a motivating factor, especially when you have lives that you’re responsible for. I’ve been there. But the important thing is remembering that, in everything you do, there are real humans behind these brands, behind these products, behind these agencies.

It’s really easy to talk about a whole bunch of companies like their logos on a slide. And in fact, that’s what some of these partner programmes are designed to do, collect logos. But that’s transactional, right? And all of these people are people. All of these teams are created from people, founders, developers, support staff. They’re all people, and they care deeply about the work they’re doing. At least in most cases, right?

[00:44:55] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. Just sort of interjecting there as well. The fear aspect that you mentioned for all of the reasons you’ve just described is so understandable where we are right now in 2026. And so ROI, it feels like it’s becoming the thing. The thing instead of anything else. And I wonder if that’s because there’s a vacuum on the other side where anything philanthropic, so let’s say for example, I don’t know, you contribute something by giving somebody a day a week to work on Core.

The calculus there is, well, we could do the ROI thing, or we could do this other philanthropic thing, but nobody will know about it. Only we’ll know about it. And if we write a blog post, then a few people will know, but almost nobody will see that that’s happening. And so there’s no kind of quid pro quo on the other side. There isn’t the recognition.

But it feels like the wheels are beginning to turn, the cogs are starting to move around that. There seems to be some initiatives that are coming, which are going to try and address contributor hours, or badges, or whatever it is that you do. Some way of recognising, okay, that company did this, we need to lord that, and praise that, and recognise that, and write it down and keep a record of it so that we know in the future.

And maybe that will be something which will be put into the spreadsheet. There will be an ROI on that thing because it’s more tangible. It will never be as tangible as the ROI of the dollar that you get back from the dollar that you spent. But at least it will be something. It’s not just sort of shouting into the void, we give that person a day, a month. Nobody knows. Nobody knows give that person a day, a month to contribute to Core. And maybe if we get to the point where those kind of things are recognised.

I don’t know what that means. I don’t know how we make that and inflate that into something important. But maybe those kind of things start to need to matter in a way that they never did matter before, because they just didn’t need to matter. But now the landscape has changed. They now do need to matter, otherwise the revenue from these companies is going to dry up.

[00:47:03] Zach Stepek: Yeah, I think that’s, it’s really interesting because when you look at all of this, first of all, partnerships, what we started this whole conversation around. You mentioned the spreadsheet. Partnership success doesn’t often show up overnight on that spreadsheet, right? It’s like tending a garden. It’s not flipping a switch.

So every partnership you grow, see what I did there, it takes time. You have to build the trust. You have to learn how each other’s businesses work. If it’s a vendor relationship and it’s only built on affiliate income, right? The agency recommends you because you give them more money than another host to do so, well, are you going to learn about that agency’s business ever? No. But if you invest the time, you build that trust, you find out how each other’s businesses work. Over time, those relationships bear fruit. And the first casualty of fear is patience.

[00:48:07] Nathan Wrigley: I like that. That sounds like the strap line from a movie.

[00:48:13] Zach Stepek: You know, revenue is just a signal. It’s one signal, right? It’s not the only signal.

[00:48:20] Nathan Wrigley: It’s so interesting this, and it’s so difficult. So here we are, we’re doing this dance. It’s even difficult to describe even though we’ve poured the last, you know, hour into thinking about this, it’s very hard to get hold of. It’s really difficult to describe. It’s very difficult to work out, to calculate. And that maybe is it. Maybe that’s the problem where we’re at. We can’t calculate it.

Like you said, it’s growing the garden, it’s turning up, doing things, things will blossom over time. It’s keeping the faith. It’s less circling of the wagons, more the rising tide carries all boats mentality.

Certainly this year feels like we’re going to go through something. And whatever comes out the other side, it will be interesting to see whether it was that wrecking ball, or whether it was people just taking a brick one at a time. Or whether it was adding stories to the building, you know, adding extra floors that didn’t exist before. It’ll be really interesting to see how this pans out because I think we’re at an inflexion point.

[00:49:23] Zach Stepek: We are. And I know, you said it’s hard to measure. And I do agree that it’s hard to measure the impact of something like partnerships. Revenue is the most common signal to use for that, right? It’s the thing that makes the most sense to a business mind. And the revenue is what fuels business growth, I get that.

But I would posit that there are a few other metrics, a few other things we can start to look at to measure success beyond revenue. Now, like I said, revenue’s a signal. There are other signals too. What’s the trust between teams? How often are partners collaborating proactively? If you’re a hosting company, you see this pretty actively. How often are your customers having better outcomes because of the partnerships you’ve forged?

Relationship equity precedes the revenue. These outcomes matter. Partnerships compound slowly. And when you’re in an environment where patience is thin because fear is high, taking the time to develop true partnerships is hard. But it is always the people that do the hard work that succeed in the end.

[00:50:36] Nathan Wrigley: I think that’s the perfect place to put a pin in it. That was such an interesting conversation. I don’t claim to understand the nuance of it still. I don’t, certainly don’t claim to have the answer but it was fascinating chatting that through with you. I think there’s things to be addressed in the year 2026, and that certainly was an interesting foray into that.

As much as I don’t want to end the conversation, I think now is probably the moment to do that. I just want to give you an opportunity to tell people where you are. You obviously had your bio at the beginning, but I don’t think you dropped a website or anything like that. So if you want to drop a social handle or a particular URL that people can find you, if they want to get into this conversation more deeply, go for it.

[00:51:18] Zach Stepek: Yeah, so all of my eCommerce consultancy is done through mightyswarm.com. That’s my agency. The fractional partnership stuff that I’m working on, the fractional help, it will also run through that. It’s not quite updated to include that yet. You can find me at zachstepek.com, which is my personal site, talks a little bit about what I do. I’m in the process of rebuilding that, so it also encapsulates the other part of my life which is my concert and music photography, which we’ll talk about it another time. And I’m zstepek pretty much everywhere. So Z S T E P E K on all the social platforms that matter.

[00:52:00] Nathan Wrigley: I will make sure that I put whatever you’ve just said into the show notes. So if you go to wptavern.com and you search for the episode with Zach Stepek then you’ll be able to find it. If you scroll down to the bottom, it’ll be under the beginning blurb, and the transcription and things like that. Go to the bottom. There’s a useful link section so it will all be there. So Zach, what a fascinating conversation that was. I really appreciate that. Thank you so much for chatting to me today.

[00:52:25] Zach Stepek: Thanks for having me. It was a lot of fun. It’s always good to talk to you.

[00:00:19] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox Podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress. The people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case, trying to navigate the new normal for WordPress community and events.

If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice. Or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you or your idea featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox and use the form there.

So on the podcast today we have Simon Pollard.

Simon has been building with WordPress for many years. Originally from Devon in England, he’s worked as a professional web developer across locations, eventually landing at Illustrate Digital, where he’s been for six years.

Simon’s not just a coder. He’s been deeply involved in the WordPress community, not only organising, but helping to grow the Bristol WordPress Meetup from a casual get together in a pub, to a thriving, officially backed event with dozens of regular attendees.

Like many in the WordPress ecosystem, Simon wears multiple hats. He’s a musician, a devoted dad, and an accidental community leader who found himself at the heart of local WordPress organising. But COVID-19 changed all that.

In today’s episode, Simon explains what happened to WordPress Meetups during and after the pandemic. How vibrant communities fizzled out. How hard it was to bring people back. And the new challenges of connecting when traditional social media platforms no longer bring everyone together.

Simon talks about his own journey, how he paused on events, shifted his social life to music, and struggled to hand the Meetup keys to new organisers. Eventually, a call from an old friend drew him back and he was faced with the new reality. Smaller groups, fractured channels, and the question of how to keep the in-person spirit of WordPress alive.

We get into the irreplaceable value of real life connection, the warmth in the room, and the need to rethink what gets people to in-person events now. Is it hybrid events? Perhaps it’s music? Something beyond pure WordPress talks? We discuss what’s been lost, what still matters, and what it might take to build the new era of WordPress community in a distracted, always connected, world.

If you’re curious about the future of WordPress Meetups, if you felt the ebb and flow of community during the past few years, or if you just want to know how to find your people again, this episode is for you.

If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast, where you’ll find all the other episodes as well.

And so without further delay, I bring you. Simon Pollard.

I am joined on the podcast by Simon Pollard. Hello Simon.

[00:03:42] Simon Pollard: Hello Nathan.

[00:03:43] Nathan Wrigley: Very nice to chat. Simon and I have met for the first time, just sort of 10 minutes ago. We’ve had a little bit of a chat. And as is so often the case, Simon has a musical instrument in the background. I don’t know what that is, but there’s definitely a thing there. WordPressers often have musical instruments.

[00:03:57] Simon: There’s more behind me as well. And randomly, I’ll bring in another fact, so I’m in a very casual band of predominantly mid forties internet developing type people. And, yeah, we’re all the same, we all play instruments. And randomly we all, without being connected in any way, can work in the same one building in Bristol, which is co-working in individual offices and we all found out we’re all in the same building. And that wasn’t how we met.

[00:04:21] Nathan Wrigley: I think probably anybody listening to this has figured out by your accent that you’re from the UK. And you mentioned Bristol just there.

[00:04:27] Simon: Well, Brizzle if I’m going to be correct.

[00:04:29] Nathan Wrigley: Right at the top of the podcast, we typically ask the guests to just give us a little potted bio, a moment or two just telling us who you are. And as it’s a WordPress podcast, just give us your background with WordPress, I guess, as well.

[00:04:40] Simon: Yeah, well, I’m from Devon originally, which the English people will pick up on the accent potentially. I try to hide that away, but every now and again a little bit of farmer will come out and it’ll be oh, argh. And then, yeah, so I was born in Devon, moved away into to Cheltenham, been to Cardiff and then ended up in Bristol and worked at various places amongst all of them.

Bristol was where I finally got my kind of proper web job, an actual proper official web job. And the first company I started used WordPress as one of the platforms, and that’s from where I started off my kind of professional career. Moved around a few places since then as developers do, but always kind of staying in the area. And then currently, I am now at Illustrate Digital. Been there for six years, joined at the start of 2020, so that was an interesting progression, we’ll cover that later.

During my time in Bristol, it was someone else who originally raised the idea of a Meetup for of WordPress devs to kind of meet up and have a chat. So myself and a few others met up with this one guy called Henry, and we just met at the pub, sat around a table and had a chat and said, what are you doing? What do you need help with? What would we like to talk about?

And it kind of progressed from being, so we had a few more kind of casual chats, managed to grow. I think there was about six of us met originally and we kind of grew a bit and then said, oh, should we try doing like talks and making it a bit more official? So we progressed onto that. Struggled to find speakers, which I think is the story of absolutely every Meetup is find someone to talk. So I ended up doing a lot of talks myself, which I didn’t mind, but there was only so many times I can involve cats and WordPress together in the same thing.

And then it grew a bit. The key point for me is we took on someone who was a project manager by trade, who was also a developer. And they created a Trello board, and then suddenly we got organised. And I don’t know how, we kind of reached out, I remember now as I’ve just literally spoken to Jenny Wong who works over at Human Made, and she was assisting and she said, you know, is there anything I can do?

And she came over, I was working in Bath at the time. So she came over in person, back in the day when you met in person. Came over to Bath and we sat down and had a coffee and a chat, and she gave me all the tips and advice she could to kind of help build the Meetup and get it bigger and try and get things working.

She also helped us get official backing. So we got the WordPress official backing for the Meetup, which is brilliant because that gave us funds. That allowed us to start hiring venues which is brilliant. So all the worry of paying for kind of costs or anything for the venues got covered by WordPress. We still reached out for sponsors, and the sponsors gave us money for food. Food is obviously a good tool to get people in as well.

It just kind of grew. And I’m not sure what made it grow or how it grew, but it just kind of fed through. But this was back in the day when social media was less run by maniacs and you were happy to post on Twitter and Facebook and it kind of grew from that. I already had quite a good Twitter following, so I just kind of shouted there all the time and tried to pull in everybody and anyone who isn’t at all connected to the internet.

We went to Facebook, I got a friend of mine, was a bit of a social media guy, he set us up several kind of media accounts and added his advice. And then, yeah, just kind of moved on, and we were getting in a good crowd. Towards the end of 2019 into 2020 we were getting say 30, 40 people coming along to the Meetup, which is really impressive.

So we’d fill out a room, we’d get catering in, that would all get done. We had an account, we were that kind of organised, so we had an actual bank account to put our sponsorship money in. We were in profit at one point. So it was crazy. It was just going, yeah, going really well. Lovely kind of gathering, it was just a nice thing. We ran monthly. The organising team grew to about six or seven of us, because there was so much to do. So there’s plenty of us involved.

And yeah, it was going great, all going along lovely. 2020 came about and then suddenly COVID, and that was it. It kind of stopped because it had to, and none of us had the appetite to do the video side of things. We didn’t really have the technology, or the means, and it was just too much with everything else that was going on in the world. So it kind of petered out, and as did my involvement in the community, as much as in person involvement kind of faded out.

And I looked back and, yeah, the last meetup that I attended was in 2020, before just the other week when I’ve gone back, but like the last one was 2020 was the last, looking at my logs, the last Meetup I attended in person, which is quite sad to look back. But this all changed around. I’ve gone very off topic of what I actually do. I think I just went into this hole.

[00:08:49] Nathan Wrigley: Oh, no, it’s great because obviously what the listener doesn’t know is that you and I already know this is what we’re destined to talk about. So you’ve given us the full introduction. So I’ll just take over for a minute, if that’s all right? Because that’s really the case, I think you could map that across all of the WordPress Meetups within the UK.

So prior to COVID, things seemed to be going great guns. There were lots and lots happening. I don’t know the exact number, but there were many. I could pluck out of the air several, and probably, if you combined all of the numbers of those, it was hundreds of people, you know, getting out of their house, going to an event, sharing expertise but also, like you said, the social side of things.

And then this moment in time, this kind of sword of Damocles, if you like, suddenly that we didn’t know was there, dropped. Killed the whole thing overnight for good reason. You know, there was a really legitimate reason for everybody to stop moving around. But it seemed to have changed something for good.

Now what’s curious about that is I remember being in that COVID time, and I remember being utterly fed up and bored, and praying for the time when things would just return back to normal. And with great speed, actually, with the benefit of hindsight, looking back, that almost seems like I watched a COVID TV program. You know, it seems like, obviously I know it was real to me, but it all seems so in the rear view mirror now. It was almost like it was part of a fictional book or something like that.

But I fully expected that the minute all of the guards, and the protections, and the legislation came away, that I would just drop back into everything that I’d done before. And so for me, that’s what happened. I went immediately back to everything, you know, attending events, and all the other different things that I do in my own spare time that have got nothing to do with WordPress.

But the curious thing is, for me at least anyway, is that I appear to be different. You know, you’ve just gone back, within the last few weeks or so. What changed for you? Have you had the time to be introspective and think to yourself, why, Simon, did I not just resume what I was doing before?

[00:10:59] Simon: Yeah. So I mean it’s twofold for me. Yeah, I’ve been very reflective over the last kind of few weeks on this because I’m just reaching out again and seeing people. It’s like, I’ve not seen you in six years and it’s kind of crazy. Well I mean I spoke to them online and responded to comments here and there but, yeah, for me it was twofold.

So during the COVID times I was fortunate enough to have a baby, which changes everything again anyway. And that just became my focus. So whilst working full time and also having a child, that was my focus. The evenings, when I used to have the time to go to the Meetups and everything, in the evening, if I had any spare time, I would just prefer to sit. I didn’t want to do anything else. I didn’t have any energy. I was spent. I was enjoying a glorious moment of sitting, and if I was lucky watching a bit of TV. Yeah, it took it all out of me.

So I’ve put things on pause in that sense. I wasn’t really doing anything. Yeah, as you’ve mentioned the guitars and everything, used to go to gigs a lot as well, but that kind of went on hold. The music side ironically kicked off after. So that’s something that did come in first. So whilst I didn’t go to Meetups, some other people, when things got back reached out to me and said, oh, I’m running a band, do you fancy joining that? So that became my kind of social outlet instead. So my focus went on that, and playing in a band and just meeting up with them. So that was my social interaction.

Ironically, that was someone I knew through, not through Meetups but through events they used to run, I think it was Future of Web Design, or future of, one of those that was down in London. A lady called Michelle, who also has a child, used to live behind me, back in the day in Bristol. She’s moved away. And then she just dropped a message on one of the other social platforms, which I’ll go back to, and just said, oh, do you fancy joining a band, I do drums? I didn’t even know she played drums. Like, she’d been playing drums since kind of school and it just came out.

So that was my social outlet for a while. So I was doing that, and that was good because that was like once a month or so we’d just meet up and have a few hours. My wife could look after my little girl. And so that was my focus for a while and that kind of kept me content for a while moving forward. But I think, yeah, I lost the kind of the urge or the will. I didn’t really have the capacity to run the Meetup that I used to be involved with.

And there were a couple of failed attempts to hand it over. Several people came in and said, oh, I’d like to have a go at running that. So it’s brilliant. So I kind of was like, here’s the keys, off you go. Even still had the Trello board and everything that we had.

And one tried and failed. I think another one did and I just kind of left it. So I assumed nothing really was happening on that. Until recently, it was last year I believe when some of the original team, a lady called Janice who was there at the very first pub round table with me, I think we’ve been to every Meetup ever since. She moved into retirement because she was a web developer and was like, don’t want to stop doing things. And she liked the community and she thought, right, well, if no one’s going to get this up again, I’ll do it again. And she was in the team at the end as well, so she’s already had the experience. She pulled together some of the others of the team. So still another couple of people, Michael and Rob who used to kind of be managing as well, they’re back in it as well and they started bringing it back to life.

And so I kind of saw this last year, the Meetups kind of started filtering through. And because I’m still connected to a lot of these people I found out, trying to remember how it came, it might, would’ve been something like LinkedIn or somewhere, or even emailed and that kind of came through. And it was like, oh, I need to go along to that one time, I really need to go along. And even one of my friends was talking, I was like, brilliant, I’ll go and see him, I’ve not seen him in ages. And then I had an operation that put me out of action for a while.

So that came in, so even when I was just about ready to go. And then finally, turn around to this year and then, yeah, another good friend of mine Ross Wintle, who is a developer, who I think a lot of people hopefully will know, he works doing stuff for ACF in particular, which is why I harass him all the time. But I’ve known him for ages. He was talking, I was like, right, I’ve got to go along because he’s talking. I’ve not seen him in six years, and it’s a great chance to see everyone. And I was so glad I did.

A lot of it, whilst it was smaller, it was still just a lot of the same people. So I think I kind of took in that seeing the people didn’t really appreciate the size but still it was kind of nice. It still felt the same. It was still the nice, friendly atmosphere which you get with WordPress. I think you get that across the board. Not just in Meetups, but devs talk to other devs which you don’t necessarily get in other industries. I would happily tell another dev, for what I would call a rival, inverted commas, company, how to do something if they were stuck, which you wouldn’t necessarily get in other industries.

And that filters through, for me, for the Meetup side. The atmosphere, it’s just very friendly and welcoming. And talking at it is a joy, because you will never get heckled. No one’s going to do that. Unless it’s a friend of yours and they’re teasing you, because you know them.

It’s just such a nice kind of crowd, and that’s where I started doing talks. And I don’t think I would’ve ever done a talk if it wasn’t in front of such a nice crowd and you knew you could kind of do what you wanted. You can make a mistake and no one’s going to pick you up on it. And then a lot of the time they were just interested to hear what you had to say. It was just, yeah, nice.

So I think I’ve already talked myself into doing a talk again. So there’s a good reason to go back. So got to think about that. Yeah, and then I said, well, I used to have a network of people, so how do I reach out to that network of people that I used to do and pull them in? Like, how do I go, right, okay, we are doing all right here but as always, looking for people to talk? So how do I reach out to those people?

And that’s kind of the next point is, the next thing that changed was the social network seemed to almost turn evil in places like Twitter, which used to be a nice go to, and you’d message everyone. Everyone kind of jumped ship because, for good reason. No one seemed to jump ship into the same boat, and everyone was doing their own thing and there was no confined next to step of where you get in touch. And that’s where I’m currently at is, six years down the line, what’s the way to kind of network now on the internet with these people and get in touch with those I may have lost touch with?

[00:16:34] Nathan Wrigley: That’s so interesting. I’m going to unpack a lot of what you said there. I’ve been making my little notes as you’ve been going along, but there’s a few things there.

So the first thing is that it’s curious you, for reasons that you’ve explained very well, you know, the family being the easy one to grasp. You know, you had a very, a different life out the other side of COVID. And so the constraints around that, and the possibilities of socialising were diminished regardless.

I didn’t have that, and so I did sort of just drop back into where I was before. But what’s curious is that clearly isn’t the pattern. You know, we hear about, not just in the WordPress space, but lots of sort of social enterprises, clubs and things that were going on all over this country, kind of lost their way. They couldn’t attract the people back.

So something happened, I think, to us during that period of time. I don’t know if we just became habituated to sitting in more and, you know, more accustomed to watching the telly. I don’t know if they’re ingrained into us somehow, was this fear of the outside world. That’s really overdramatising it, but hopefully you can grasp what I mean. You know, just this idea that outside, bad, inside, good.

[00:17:44] Simon: It was two years of being told to stay inside. And whether of not, that’s going to sink in isn’t? At some point, without even thinking.

[00:17:50] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. But then it just means that, when eventually the guardrails are pulled off, and obviously they weren’t just pulled off in one fell swoop. It was this sort of slow experimental phase, where you could be with a few people and then more people, and then that all got pulled back again, and then it all began again. Eventually, where we are now is you can do basically everything again. There’s no restrictions whatsoever.

But the community, the WordPress community in particular, I do wonder if we probably went into our screens a bit more than the typical person might do. Because, you know, we’re on our screens doing the work. Six o’clock maybe would’ve rolled by in the year 2018 and we would’ve closed the laptop, shut the computer down, and then done the other things. But then for a period of three or four years, we just carried on, on the screens and met on Zoom, or just carried on watching Netflix or whatever it may be. And then untangling all of that on the other side, proved hard, hard to do.

But then the bit that you just said, I’ve never thought about that. The social media, the shattering of social media where people have decided that this platform over there is not for them anymore. And, okay, I’m going to either discontinue using social media, or go to somewhere else and there really isn’t that, what do they call X? They used to call it the town square or something like that. And that’s a long time since that happened. But there’s now, there’s no replacement for that. There’s no one place you can go to. Everything’s shattered over multiple accounts. There’s no question there, but I don’t know if you wanted to respond to any of that.

[00:19:15] Simon: That’s where I am at the minute was I moved on, I tried different things and that’s randomly how I got the band notification was off one of those. But I can’t even remember now what platform that was. And I think I’ve closed the tab on my browser, and I’ve long since forgotten and not really gone back into it because it was a handful of people. And I spent a lot of time building up my Twitter following, and I just lost the urge to kind of do that all over again. And followed enough people for a while but then kind of lost the interest in that.

And, yeah, I don’t know, it’s weird. It’s just because there isn’t really anywhere that’s taken over that was, I mean Twitter was the key one for me. That was because I managed the account for the Meetup as well. So I could post on their behalf, but I could also kind of tie in and connect myself. I could retweet myself and retweet other people, and you could get those connections in place which is harder to do now.

That was my go-to, and then I don’t really know now, yeah, where to reach out. And even, one of the things raised at the Meetup I went to was, someone asked a question. It was like, well I’m not sure I can answer that for you immediately. We need to kind of sit down in front of a computer or something. But how do we communicate in between this and the next Meetup? How do we talk? What is the way to communicate now, that’s standard? You give out an email address or something that, I don’t know. Is that the way you communicate? I seemed very lost and almost forgotten how to socialise outside of actually being there in person. The in-betweens, which I’ve been doing for years and years, what’s the in-between way of talking?

[00:20:40] Nathan Wrigley: It’s strange that that’s a thing really, isn’t it? But it definitely is a thing. I suppose the piece of the jigsaw puzzle where it fits into this podcast is that if you are new to WordPress and you’ve never been to any of these events, and you’ve recently started going, a bit like you have done again. You go and you look at the event and you’ll think, okay, this is nice. Here’s the collection of people. But if you were to go pre 2019, so 2017, 2018 in particular, you were probably looking at the same event with, I don’t know, five times the number of people, 3, 4, 5, maybe even 10 times the number of people.

And so whatever that period was, whether it was COVID or a variety of other things, the numbers have dropped. And I think, whilst it’s not, I’m using air quotes at the moment, whilst it’s not necessary to have community for an open source CMS software project, certainly helps.

It helps that these people gather. It helps that they gain empathy. They sort of start to understand each other. It helps so that they feel a connection. You know, they’re going to join different teams because, oh, that person’s in that team and I know that person. It helps because it enables you to share knowledge and hopefully, instead of 10 people falling over the same problem, one person does, and shares their experience to the other nine. And yada, yada, yada. On it goes.

And it does trouble me that that component is now missing. It makes me think this isn’t good. And I don’t know what the answer is. I wish I had a magic wand that I could wave and bring it all back. Does it bother you? Do you feel that the community should still be important? Or can we just say, this is now where it is, just accept it. This is what we’ve got.

[00:22:26] Simon: Having dipped my toe back in properly into the community as it were, recently, it’s kind of reminiscing now what it was, and there’s still elements there of what it is and knowing people. It is almost networking. It’s kind of knowing those people, and someone knows someone. There’s a very kind of small world. Those relationships and people I used to speak to a lot that I didn’t so much, and it’s weird why that kind of stopped.

And I think, yeah, it’s definitely the kind of the sharing. And it’s particularly relevant I would say if you are a freelancer or work on your own or you are even part of a smaller team. But the networking helps you kind of expand out, and expand your team without it having to be in the company you’re working for. Because as I previously mentioned, the rare thing in the WordPress community is that a developer can speak to another developer about an issue for say, it might even be for a client, and they will work together to resolve it. Offering back is how it was, and I think it still is in some areas, which you wouldn’t say get in others. And I think that’s the community side of it that’s very different.

And I noticed that with the Meetup because I’ve been to other Meetups. We even did a collaboration Meetup as well. And the other ones I went to, it just didn’t feel the same kind of warmth. It felt very fixed. There was no kind of welcoming.

So the one thing that has always been relevant that the Bristol one, is we’ve got a welcoming team. So as soon as you step through the door there’s someone there. Get a little name badge as well. And if you’re new, they’ll ask a few questions and find out what you do. And what we always do is, oh, what do you do? Oh, I’m in project management. Ah, go and speak to so and so, they’re a project manager. Or, I’m looking for a developer. Or kind of find out what was their reasoning, and then direct them because we knew who was there.

That’s opposed to other ones where you go in and you almost kind of sign in and then you’re left to your own devices, and no one approaches you, and it just felt very kind of awkward. Whereas we would try and engage everybody, and we were lucky with the people who kind of organised it, with people like Janice who’s just a naturally approachable person and she will go out and talk to people. And we had that kind of mixture of people that, it just made it nice, and it was nice to go along. And you would go along for the people as much as you would for the talk itself.

I would go to talks which had absolutely no interest to me on paper, but I go along anyway because I wanted to see everybody. And then I ended up finding out that these talks were actually sometimes even more interesting when I thought they wouldn’t be any relevance to me. And it helps you kind of expand your kind of knowledge, and appreciate other elements, and other factors that you might not know about. Which in person is just a lot better and I think it’s more engaging as well. So you can kind of stare at a screen watching something. It isn’t quite as engaging as it is being in person.

And also, once you finish, it’s the debrief after that I really like. So when the talk is finished and everything’s wrapping up, you can go and speak to the talker and query something with them and go and speak to other people. And you kind of have that little social bit afterwards, and it’s all just nice and relaxed. And you don’t really get that on a video call because you can’t really go and mingle on a video call, because how do you go and talk to someone else. And it isn’t the same in person, it’s just a lot easier to kind of do that.

Yeah, how do you sell that for something that wasn’t there for a few years? It’s twofold. How do you bring in the people who used to come? And how do you introduce people who may have been born into never having that? The younger generation who lived through COVID, and didn’t really have that Meetup experience before it to know that this exists on the other side. And what would make it appeal to different kind of levels, really?

[00:25:43] Nathan Wrigley: So I’m not entirely sure, again, if we could rewind the clock. So this is going much, much further back. Let’s say the year 2003, something like that, when WordPress was really little. I don’t actually know the date of the first Meetup, but let’s imagine it was around there. And nobody had, in the WordPress community had ever thought to meet up.

If that just never had become a thing, I wonder how the project would’ve fared. I wonder if it would have been as successful. Because, you know, there were things like Skype and these platforms were coming along where you could do project management and things like that online. It feels like there was no, there would’ve been no inhibition to it being successful.

But I’m more or less willing to predict that it would not have been successful. I think the glue that binds the project together on some completely unquantifiable level is that community. And a certain proportion of that community in the past required the in-person meeting. You know, whether it be the WordCamp events, where they get on a plane or in a car and drive a long distance for a few days and lots of talks. Or whether it’s the more kind of informal monthly Meetup scenario, where it’s probably closer to home and a little bit quicker and one evening only, something like that.

I just have an intuition that the project wouldn’t have been successful. It was those people, and I think I’ve heard the word maven. Maven being this sort of description of somebody who is like a hyper connector. They’re really good at connecting the dots between people and saying, you should meet this person, and you should meet this person. A little bit how you described.

I think there’s some jigsaw puzzle of that going on. There’s some tapestry of these community members making it successful in a way we’ll never fully unpick. And now that that, in the year, so we’re recording this in March, 2026. Now that that seems to be somewhat in question, it then raises the question of, well, what does that mean for the future of the project as a whole?

My anticipation is that if we were to, let’s say nobody from this moment forward ever attended an event again, I think the project would not be as successful. There would be less development, there would be less interest in it. So I think it’s important that we do get these things back. But again, moving on to your point about how, that’s the tricky piece. You know, has life changed? Is the advent of everything online all the time, you know, so go back 10 years, there was no Netflix. Well, maybe there was, I don’t know. But the point is the entertainment that’s available through everybody’s TV now is so compelling, it’s kind of hard to fight against that.

But I don’t know how we get the young people in. I don’t know what it is about, you know, what the competition is. We’ve obviously got AI painted into the mix, and all of the interesting things going on there. So I don’t really, I’m not really pressing you for the answer.

[00:28:36] Simon: That’s fine. One of the reasons for joining is to kind of ask that question to the people listening and saying, has anyone else got that kind of magical wand and jigsaw missed piece? Has anyone got any ideas to kind of move forward with it? Because I say, I’m going to be looking, moving forward now, what I can do and how I can connect and get back in touch with people that I’ve not spoken to. I’ve already done it with a few people I hadn’t spoken to in a while. It’s like, oh, I’ve not spoken to you, oh, you’ve got a child as well. Oh, lovely. Those things you talk about which you just kind of left.

But yeah, I completely cut short on it and it’s just bizarre. But it is kind of coming back. It’s nice to know that whilst it’s quiet, it’s still there. It hasn’t died out, it’s just a little bit smaller than it was. But like you say, whether it can rebuild to where it was, or even partway to that is the query. I’d hope it can because I think it helps.

And the project itself, as you mentioned, WordPress wouldn’t exist without a community because it’s built by a community. It’s not built by a singular development company, and we wait for them to do it, you get involved. If you want to work with WordPress, you can do. There’s nothing stopping you getting involved. You can get in, you can be involved, you can be a tester, you can be a developer for it. There’s no like barrier to be involved in it, and it needs that community to keep it going. As you said, it wouldn’t probably have progressed to where it is without that community behind it.

And that community is still there in some context, but where are they in terms of, how can I to them and talk to them? Because there’s definitely people I want to reach out to again. And what’s the way to reach people these days? What’s the platform now? What’s the way to reach out to people? Where are people talking? Are they talking anymore? Or is it all just looking at TikTok? This is where I’m going to sound really old. Looking at like TikTok and just looking at short videos of things and that’s where. Or do people still communicate, and how? What’s the way to do that?

[00:30:20] Nathan Wrigley: I get what you’re saying by the way. I am of a certain age and things like, how do you even do TikTok? What even is that? I’m not entirely sure. But again, rewinding the clock, the website was the thing. That was the fulcrum of the internet really. It was, you know, suddenly you had this capacity to publish things online, and in order to do that, certainly prior to Facebook and MySpace and those platforms, you had your blog, you know, that was the way to do it.

You had to go through the process of setting it up. And the process of setting it up would pull back the curtain on, oh, so this is a bunch of files and a thing called a database. Right, okay. And that’s now on my computer, is it? Oh, right. And then that means I can mess up out with it. Oh, that’s interesting. And I can do this. And so this loop of curiosity gets created.

Whereas now, and again, this is where I’m going to sound old, the internet feels like a very different place. You know, you’ve got a billion platforms that you can just log into, no money down. There’s maybe some, you know, quid pro quo in terms of advertising or selling whatever it is that your attention can demand. And you can create your stuff over there, and it’s fine. And that platform has a reach of 3.6 billion people and yada yada, on you go.

So whether the incentives for younger people has changed because they just don’t see the need for having a website. Because that’s all been taken care of by these platforms that you log into. And, oh, just go over there, username, password, I’m all done. I think there’s something there.

[00:31:48] Simon: Yeah, I guess it’s the questions when you’re working on something. Because back in the day you would speak to someone, it would be someone’s response. If I had a question I would need someone to have answered that question on the internet. So developers will, of a certain age, will know Stack Overflow is kind of the go-to. That’s where we spent most of our time on the internet. You’d ask Stack overflow because you’d hope someone else had the same issue, and they responded or they’ve posted it, someone’s told them how to fix it or that kind of thing.

And I got to the point where even I started, I made it as a goal to hit a certain score on Stack Overflow. I was like, right, I’m going to hit a certain score, I’m going to respond, I’m going to answer questions, just because I want to feel like I’m giving back because it felt nice. I’d consumed so many answers from Stack Overflow, it felt rude not to give back. And the same thing for me I think with WordPress is I was consuming so much information I wanted to kind of give back, it was nice. And it made you feel, there was a nice thing in the community thing was, if I knew the answer to something and I could explain that to someone else and help them, it was a nice feeling, it was a nice thing to do.

It was like, I’ve learned this thing, and you are looking to do that thing, oh, I learned it, do it this way, this is how you do it. And that kind of helped me. So all of my Stack responses were WordPress. And it was nice to kind of respond to someone and them say, oh yeah, that’s great, and then several other people would like it. It was just a real nice, positive thing as well.

But now, again, there is a lot of reliance on AI coming forward, because it’s like, you ask AI and AI gives you the answer. And whilst AI consumes information from people, it doesn’t tell you who it consumed it from. So your answer is coming from the AI agent you are using, not from whoever’s actually come up with that answer. So you’ll get your responses, you don’t have to reach out to a person anymore so much as you did back in the day. And whether that’s a factor that the community isn’t needed because it’s being replaced. And you aren’t exposed to the community so you are not getting the answers through the community, you are getting it kind of channeled through an AI agent who’s consuming that.

So they’re doing all the stuff you used to do, and giving you the answers without you having gone into the community and found out that, oh, it was Joe Blogs who answered that question. And it might be that you reach out to them and say, actually, you knew this, do you know that? I’ve made connections through kind of these things as well, and if the answers are no longer attributed, and it’s like the AI agent is the one who’s responded, you don’t know who actually did that if that came through someone because it’s got this information.

[00:34:07] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, it’s just the void provided the answer for you. Yeah, yeah.

[00:34:11] Simon: Exactly. And that’s the community’s kind of gone on that sense but, is that how people are kind of, that’s what they like or do people still enjoy asking others? I still like responding to others internally in my team. If one of my fellow devs has a question, I love to kind of speak, screen share, go and talk through together, because it’s a lot more kind of enjoyable than just asking the internet.

[00:34:32] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. So I wonder if that’s the bear bones of what we need to sort of aspire to. So it’s to realise that there’s a proclivity to, so, okay, rewind a bit. To realise that the community has taken a hit. There’s no question that’s happened. But also to realise that there isn’t a panacea for this. There’s no red pill that we can take which is going to fix it over time.

It’s to recognise that there’s value in these things. It may be that there has been a dwindling in the audience of these things, but also that little avatar that you just painted of the person who’s curious about the code, but also has a desire to hang out, for the multitude of reasons that that could be, you know, they want to just hang out because that’s a nice thing to do, or they want to do networking, or they want to just make connections that they can chat to when they’re not in the room. To recognise that those people are still out there, and maybe those numbers are smaller.

Whilst you were talking also, it sort of occurred to me that maybe we’re just in flux. You know, nobody’s writing on cuneiform tablets anymore. Nobody’s using a stylist to write on papyrus anymore. Things change, you know, over time. And it may be that this is just the new normal, this is what we now have. I’m not entirely sure. But I kind of long for halcyon days. I’m looking back to those sort of 2018s, 2019s and thinking that’s the bar I’d like to have set. Whether or not that’s possible, I’m not sure.

[00:35:59] Simon: Yeah. It leads to me onto the level up on the Meetup was the WordCamps where it was a big kind of weekend event. And I was lucky enough to be involved. So I was the speakers organiser for the WordCamp that was in Bristol in 2019. Ironically booked my boss before I joined a company just as one of the speakers, and someone we employed as well I booked in for that.

And that was just, yeah, it got so big that we could actually run an entire weekend of stuff. But because the Meetups are now going down in size, I see there is still the appetite. It seems in America and other kind of countries around, but would there still be the appetite in England specifically, where we’re both based, for there to be a WordCamp? Would there be enough to warrant one of those? Or would it have to be very scaled back? Because I remember back in the day, I’ve been to like the London ones and you’ve got multiple tracks. Even the Bristol one had two separate tracks running. But now would it be something a bit more stripped back? Would it just be one track and a small kind of event? What scale would it be? Would there still be the interest?

[00:36:56] Nathan Wrigley: And also, does it have to be kind of mixed up with other things? Like, does it have to be part entertainment, part information, part hallway? Because again, I just wonder if that’s the diet that we’ve created ourselves with. Our always on culture, where entertainment is so readily available, I do wonder if, you know, we’ve got to just acknowledge that those things are of importance.

If you want to attract an audience of people, you’ve got to have the social afterwards, you’ve got to have the band, the live entertainment, the bits in between, the, I don’t know what that is, but just some aspect of gimmicks to make these events fun. Not just, okay, let’s go to a talk, watch the talk and then all go home.

[00:37:36] Simon: Yeah. There was always, I mean the thing I liked with a lot of these was there was the kind of a developer day or, that often preceded so you could get involved a bit more for those who wanted to. So there were kind of certain things. There were the socials as well that was always key to some, and that was just a nice way to kind of unwind afterwards. Because a lot of the time people would be traveling, so you didn’t want to go to the event and then go back to the hotel room and sit on your own. You could stay out and chat.

And as mentioned before, the community is a lovely community. So it’s people you want to hang out with because they’re nice people to hang out with. They’re all really lovely. And I’ve met a lot of really nice people at Meetups, at WordCamps. Just afterwards in particular and just chatting, chat about anything because after a while you get bored talking about WordPress, you’ll chat about whatever you want.

I mean if I get talking about music then I’m away. But it’s just, you build those relationships. And there are connections that I’ve made back, six, seven years ago that I’m still in touch now and I’m reaching out again and going, we lost that touch in between. So I’m kind of reaching out again and just catching up with people. It’s just nice to know like, oh, you’re still in the industry. What are you doing? What’s happened to you? And that kind of just disappeared almost. There wasn’t a way to stay in touch in between.

[00:38:42] Nathan Wrigley: The sort of glib comment that I made at the beginning about the fact that if we were to switch on the cameras on this podcast, we’d be able to see that Simon has a guitar in his background.

[00:38:51] Simon: I’ve got more if you look further up.

[00:38:52] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah, there’s many musical instruments there. But the point being though that there seems to be a, certainly from my perspective, doing these interviews on a, multiple a week. There’s a high correlation between musicians and WordPressers. And so I’m going to drop this bomb. Maybe that’s a channel for these events is to combine other things. Like combine cinema with a WordPress event. So, you know, there’s a track for watching films at the same time as there’s tracks for speakers, but there’s also live music over there. You know, I’m not suggesting we invite Coldplay or anything. But, you know, some local acts. Maybe some of the people that are involved in the event themselves, many of whom we know are musicians. It’s gimmicks again, but it’s fun.

[00:39:32] Simon: It’s a nice way, yeah, I mean it’s on our, so our band’s been going for a while and it’s still on our bucket list is to actually perform somewhere. We get together and rehearse and it’s one of my bucket list things is I would love to actually perform. Even if it’s just in a small pub in front of a handful of people and I know them all anyway, but just to kind of do that performance in front of things.

So that could be tied in. I wouldn’t be against kind of suggesting it to the rest of the guys and saying, there’s going to be this event and there’s all sorts of things taking place. There’ll be some technical talks or whatever and all these things. There’s also some music so we could perform. Definitely an idea. Yeah, like you said, there’s a lot of musicians around.

[00:40:07] Nathan Wrigley: Like a hybrid, arts meets technology kind of event.

[00:40:11] Simon: Yeah. There’s a lot of creativity. One of the best people I got speaking at the Bristol Meetup, bare in mind this is just a very small handful of people, a guy called Gavin Strange who works for Aardman. He is just amazing, and he’s done some brilliant speeches. I lucked out working with him on a community thing where we got together on a weekend and built websites in the space of a weekend. So thank God for WordPress, I basically built a site in, I don’t know, about five hours, we built a website from scratch.

He was working with us doing some animations and things and was such a positive, really great person. He works outside of work. He’s insane. He never stops. I reached out on a whim and said, do fancy doing a talk? And he goes, well, I don’t do WordPress. It doesn’t matter, it can be anything. And he came along and did a really good, positive, energetic talk. And that was my biggest coup was I got him to speak to us.

[00:40:57] Nathan Wrigley: And it was nothing to do with WordPress. Okay, that’s so interesting.

[00:41:00] Simon: Absolutely nothing. Nothing to do with WordPress. He just talked about, I can’t even remember, it’s a long time ago, but it was just interesting because it, just talking about what he does and a lot of kind of what he does outside of his working day and keeping busy and just.

[00:41:14] Nathan Wrigley: There’s a lot of overlap with soft skills and things, isn’t there? And to be honest with you, even just learning about the animation process and the tech, no doubt, involved in that. It’s kind of interesting. Okay. This is fascinating. This is going in an unexpected direction.

[00:41:27] Simon: That’s my thing now is maybe I can reach out to him again. And then through my other ways I’ve, I know someone who’s done a TED talk. That’s just probably a little level too much, but he’s a mountain biker. But I wonder, can I tie in that into somehow? And can I pull in that crowd that way? There’s all those kind of connections. It’s like, it doesn’t have to be. I think that’s the thing, we managed to get across that it doesn’t have to be WordPress. You can talk about anything if it relates to the internet, and then it might just aspire that that connects to a site that runs WordPress.

That’s how we kind of got a bigger crowd because we dabbled. We did do a technical focused one and it just, that was my thing. I really wanted to get techie and nerdy and it’s like, but you just cut down to too much of a niche and you’re cutting people out. It’s better to kind of have all sorts of things, and as I mentioned before, getting people to see a talk about something they might not think they’re interested in and realise actually it is very interesting and put across and try and get people in.

[00:42:17] Nathan Wrigley: Yeah. I think that’s the perfect place to sort of draw a line under this one. So what we’re saying is that WordPress events, Meetups in particular, I think we’re talking about mainly, they’re definitely going through a state of flux. We don’t necessarily have the answer, but we’ve definitely floated what the problem is. And there’s a few towards the end there, interesting ideas of ways to possibly make it more engaging to people who’ve, I don’t know, just lost interest, or have never come across WordPress.

So, oh, that’s fascinating. I really enjoyed that. Simon, where do people find you? Where are, you mentioned earlier how the entire world of social networking has been shattered.

[00:42:53] Simon: That’s my issue. Yeah, well, I mean you can find me on illustrate.digital. I’ve got to give a slight plug out to the company I work for. We are a WordPress agency. We do loads of stuff for WordPress. At the minute I seem to be living on LinkedIn. I got addicted to a game on there, and then I kept kind of pulling back. That’s my kind of way to reach out at the minute so you can find me there. I think, yeah, otherwise I don’t really use the other socials. I am on Facebook, if you find me, good luck. But otherwise I think LinkedIn is the way to get me initially. But if you’ve got an example and say, ah, you should join this platform, do reach out and let me know, I’m happy to have a look.

[00:43:22] Nathan Wrigley: Thank you. I will make sure that anybody listening to this is able to find that. If you go to wptavern.com, search for the episode with Simon Pollard in, you’ll be able to probably scroll to the bottom of the show notes and there’ll be links to his LinkedIn.

So Simon Pollard, that was a really curious and interesting chat. Thank you for chatting to me today. I appreciate it.

[00:43:41] Simon: Thank you very much Nathan.

[00:00:00] Nathan Wrigley: Welcome to the Jukebox Podcast from WP Tavern. My name is Nathan Wrigley.

Jukebox is a podcast which is dedicated to all things WordPress, the people, the events, the plugins, the blocks, the themes, and in this case a firsthand look at the CloudFest Hackathon.

If you’d like to subscribe to the podcast, you can do that by searching for WP Tavern in your podcast player of choice, or by going to wptavern.com/feed/podcast, and you can copy that URL into most podcast players.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to feature on the podcast, I’m keen to hear from you and hopefully get you or your idea featured on the show. Head to wptavern.com/contact/jukebox, and use the form there.

So on the podcast today, we have something different. Usually it’s me, Nathan Wrigley, chatting with a guest about something related to WordPress, whether that’s a plugin, Core updates, or perhaps an aspect of the WordPress community.

This time around, it’s me, and later on, a bunch of guests talking about an event. The event in question has already taken place, but the next iteration of it is just around the corner. And if you read the title of this episode, you’ll already know that I’m talking about CloudFest.

CloudFest is an unusual event. The most obvious indicator of this fact is that it takes place in Europa Park in Rust, Germany. It’s one of the world’s premier theme parks.

CloudFest is at its heart, a tech conference, but every year, just before the main CloudFest conference begins, a very different event takes place. It’s called the CloudFest Hackathon. So whilst the rollercoasters are testing the laws of physics outside, inside a group of developers, UX designers and system architects are testing the limits of the modern internet.

Dozens of the world’s most talented engineers strip away the corporate sales pitches and set themselves a variety of collaborative challenges to be completed in just three days. Now we see hackathons all the time. Usually they’re sponsored by a single company trying to get people to use their specific API, or their high pressure competitions, to build a disruptive startup in 48 hours. But the CloudFest Hackathon isn’t like this. It’s professional, it’s non-commercial, and its primary intention isn’t necessarily to build a product, it’s to maintain the ecosystem.

So let’s hear from somebody who knows all about the CloudFest Hackathon, and that person, is Carole Olinger.

[00:03:04] Carole Olinger: My name is Carole, and I am the head of CloudFest Hackathon. I’m very excited about my role here and to be able to connect so many awesome people and talent around the world.

So I think there are multiple definitions for a hackathon. In this case I would probably define it as a gathering of open source enthusiasts who are going to be working and coding and designing a lot of exciting projects together. They haven’t met before in many cases, and they are put in the same room for three days being fed, being caffeinated and trying to improve the open web.

[00:03:42] Nathan Wrigley: Who’s on the organizing team?

[00:03:44] Carole Olinger: So basically, I am leading the whole operation in my role for CloudFest and the World Hosting Days. And I have the most amazing supporting team around me that anyone could ever imagine. So it is Lucas Ratke from Automattic, Alain Schlesser from Yoast, and Thierry Muller from Google, who are on the project support team, and making sure that we have all these really valuable projects in our event. And that project leads are prepared in the best possible way.

And for the first time we also have a volunteer that is helping during the event. And is specifically helping me wrangling the 110 amazing sheep around me, and to make sure that there are accommodations are covered. That all the catering is being done. And that is a Simon Kraft from Group One.

[00:04:36] Nathan Wrigley: I show up to an event like this, all the jigsaw pieces are in place you think, oh, it just happens, but of course it doesn’t just happen. How long have you spent working on this event? How long have you been wrangling this whole thing into existence?

[00:04:49] Carole Olinger: Usually we start in September. And then it’s more okay, what are our objectives? What are our goals for this edition? We are really trying to take as much feedback as possible from previous year’s attendees, to make sure that we have improvements in place and new additions to the event for the following edition. So that happens in September. Creating the team, making sure that we have specific objectives and goals and those are manageable.

And then the actual work starts in October, and then becoming more and more intense over the upcoming months. And I would say January is probably the most crazy month. I barely slept.

[00:05:31] Nathan Wrigley: So the idea really is that you put. In this case, 10 projects in a room. You’ve got 10 project leads and, in some cases there’s multiple people leading a project. And then you add into that mix over a hundred people, many of whom appear to be developers, and you stir that pot up a bit, and hope that things come out the end that are useful, that have been enjoyable to work on.

How do you decide what the 10, in this case, projects were? And are you oversubscribed with people wishing to be a part of it? And so how do you decide what makes it? How do you decide which projects are interesting to CloudFest Hackathon each year?

[00:06:10] Carole Olinger: So this has been evolving over the years. So I remember additions, three or four years ago, or previous to the pandemic. Where our project team was pulling projects out of the different CMS communities, open source project communities. So we had ideas about what we wanted to tackle, and some projects came out of the communities. So we were like hunting ideas, and also planting ideas inside communities.

This year is the first year where we didn’t have to do any of that. We had 22 pitches from different CMS communities and other open source projects that were pitching their ideas to us. So it was like a kind of a hard choice to determine which ones are going to make it.

So usually we are trying to take into consideration what the theme of the main event CloudFest is, and obviously as everyone is excited about AI these days, that is something we wanted to cover. So we made sure we had some projects that had AI involvement. And then what is really important to my heart, and to the team’s heart, is that we are having cross CMS collaborations.

So we are trying to have WordPress people here, which is obviously the community that I am mostly connected with. But also TYPO3. TYPO3 is one of our, the W3 Association is one of our top level sponsors. We since years we have Joomla people, Drupal people joining us. We are trying to find a good mix to empower those cross CMS collaborations and also cross-project collaborations. So even within one platform, just to name WordPress as an example, we try to make sure that we have projects that could eventually benefit from each other.

[00:07:54] Nathan Wrigley: I’m guessing also, there’s a component of trying to work out projects that if you put a hundred people in a room, there’s not a hundred replicas of the same person. Each of them are different. That there are 10 different places where they can land. Because one thing that I didn’t realize and was really curious to me, is when the Hackathon started, apart from the project leads, nobody’s assigned a place to go. They listen to a little speech at the beginning. It’s like a promotional thing. Two minutes, this is what we want to do, the pitch. And then the people make a decision. And for 10 minutes or something, there’s this sort of chaotic moving of people around, and then it all settles down.

So presumably you have a wide array of project pitches, so that those a hundred plus people can decide, they’re not all surrounding the one table and there’s a table over there that’s empty, I guess that fits in the jigsaw as well.

[00:08:44] Carole Olinger: So we are taking very much care about the selection process of applicants. So when we know what our projects are going to look like, we are trying to match their needs in terms of skills that attendees are going to present to us during their application.

So usually we have between 300 and 400 applications for the Hackathon, and we have 110 slots. But, and this is important to understand, our partners are bringing team members within these 110 attendees. And our partners this year have been super actively involved, which I love. So they were not only giving us money to make this event possible, to be able to invite open source contributors to this place, including their hotel, accommodation and food. They were bringing, people resources. I hate the term, but you know what I mean. So they were sending their crew to lead, to participate in these open source ideas and projects. So in the end we had 60 available spots for open source contributors. And then we made sure that we are matching the skills that they were sharing with us in their applications with the needs that the projects will have on the table.

So we have a pretty good understanding already about who’s going to be at what table. And obviously we are monitoring that. So we give them some time to make the decisions. And if we see that there are skills missing at a certain table, or if there’s another table that is going to be too full and too complicated to manage by the project lead, we are kindly convincing, and reassigning people, to participate in different projects.

[00:10:19] Nathan Wrigley: So that’s interesting. So it’s not just a free for all? The idea is to maximize the output of the projects, the 10 different projects at the end, and you will, like you said, politely, ask people to move over if you believe that the thing that they have said that they’re good at, is, matching. And there’s a, I don’t know, a hole in one particular project.

That brings me to this question then. Is the intention that these projects have a life after this event has finished? Or is it just a case of, okay, we’ve all had a nice time, the event has closed, let’s all move on with our lives.

[00:10:48] Carole Olinger: This is becoming more and more important to us. As I said earlier, we are trying to improve something every year like, like focusing on something when we are fixing our goals that we can do better every year. And what we can definitely do better is spreading the word about what amazing achievements the teams have been building during the event, and make sure that this project’s become more sustainable. So that the world knows that there’s potential in the outcomes of CloudFest Hackathon project, and to potentially unlock support and resources for these projects to continue.

I would love to spread the word, making it possible to unlock these resources. And then also inside our team, building more and more resources to follow up with this project leads from our end.

[00:11:33] Nathan Wrigley: There’s an element of, how to describe it? There’s this time pressure in the whole event. So that the thing is basically three days long, from inception until final judging, three days. So the pressure is on, and I can feel at the moment the pressure is increasing slightly. You can sense that people are getting quite into the project they’re working on.

I noticed last night, long after the event had officially closed down, there was quite a lot of people still sitting there. They’re were obviously wedded to what they’re doing. There is this sort of like Shark Tank element where there’s going to be a judgment at the end and somebody’s going to win.

How does that work? Who gets to decide who’s the winner?

[00:12:06] Carole Olinger: So we do have a jury, and the jury is composed of representatives of our top tier partners. And they send one representative to the jury. Then we do have one representatives from the Groundbreaker Talents charity project. Because, on a side note, all these awards are being sponsored by companies, and everything that we are collecting in terms of sponsorships is going to the Groundbreak Talents initiative. And then we have the project support team, and myself being on the juries. And it’s an uneven number. So we have nine people, which is always good to have on a jury. And after the presentation of results on the last day of the hackathon, the jury is going to deliberate.

And then we are going to listen to the project support team, who has been working the room and connecting with the project tables during the three days in terms of technical achievements, challenges they have seen. So they’re going to give us some impression on that. And that is mostly important for the Tech Visionary Award. And then, all of us have had the chance to obviously see the presentations, which is important for the Pitch Perfect Award. Who has the most appealing presentation of results? We do have the Social Media Master Award, that is fully being tracked.

So Simon and I, we are going to give the jury some insights on who has created the most boss on social media. . And, then we do have the Breaking Barriers Award, which is a new one. So this is about using inclusive technologies, and getting some outputs that are going to be helpful for a diverse set of users, and connecting people on the user base, but also how the people have been working together in terms of having diverse skills and perspectives on the table.

So these are some of the awards, and there’s going to be an overall winner. We have five categories, and an overall winner. And the overall winner is, the one that has the most points.

Thanks to Carole for that comprehensive introduction to the CloudFest Hackathon. Now, let’s look at the why. Why do people travel from 30 plus different countries around the world to do all of this?

In our industry, we talk a lot about the cloud, but we often forget that the cloud is just a massive collection of interconnected open source projects. You have WordPress powering 40 plus percent of the web, you have the Linux kernel, you’ve got PHP and Python communities, and then you have the hosting providers and hardware manufacturers. Normally, these groups live in silos. They communicate via GitHub issues or formal API documentation. Well, the intention of the hackathon is to create what might be called the human API. It’s about taking a person who might maintain a security plugin, and sitting them at the same table as an engineer who manages millions of servers for a global host.

When you remove the barrier of the screen, the friction of the internet disappears. Problems that have been sitting in a backlog for six months get solved over a coffee, or a shared meal because the right people are finally in the same physical space.

Although, as Carole mentioned, there is a winner, this isn’t really about winning a prize. In fact, the prizes are almost secondary to the real goal, which is contributing back to open source projects, some of which already exist, some of which are new. The intention is all free and open source software or FOSS for short.

These contributors aren’t there to build something proprietary and closed. They’re there to ensure the plumbing of the internet stays robust, secure, and interoperable. Oh, and to have some fun collaborating at the same time.

Speaking of contributors, let’s hear from some of them now and get a little taste of what their project was all about.

The room as you will hear was a little noisy.

[00:15:52] Javier Casares: I am Javier Casares and I am one of the co-leads from for the CMS Cloud Manager Project.

[00:15:58] Nathan Wrigley: What does this project hope to achieve?

[00:16:00] Javier Casares: Usually when you have a cPanel or Plesk or some kind of panel, you can install a WordPress, for example, with one click, but the server is not configured.

So in this project, we want to configure not only the CMS, but also the server where the CMS is going to be

[00:16:20] Nathan Wrigley: And how’s it going so far?

[00:16:22] Javier Casares: It’s fine. We have the public part because we want to have a website so you can configure things and prepare everything. And then we have this software, the real software that creates everything. And more or less it’s, fine, at this moment. So I think we can achieve everything for the hackathon, for the finals.

[00:16:46] Mattias Pfefferle: I’m Mathias. I am working on Activity Pub and the Fediverse.

[00:16:51] Nathan Wrigley: And what’s the project that you’re working on at CloudFest, the Hackathon?

[00:16:55] Mattias Pfefferle: We are working on federated events. So it’s very much a special case of the Fediverse.

[00:17:02] Nathan Wrigley: And what is the intention of the project? What are you hoping to get out of it?

[00:17:05] Mattias Pfefferle: We try to build a decentralized, alternative to the big social networks around events, so that people does not have to rely on something they do not have control over. So we would hope to get an alternative to meetup.com, maybe, or any other big closed proprietary social network, around events.

[00:17:29] Nathan Wrigley: And how’s it going so far?

[00:17:30] Mattias Pfefferle: It’s mixed, because even if it’s a standard, there are different variations of using the standard. So we filed a lot of bug reports, and tried to work on a standard that better describes the standard , if that makes sense? And we’re trying to make federation happen using WordPress and some other platforms that are built by people that are part of the Hackathon team.

[00:17:58] Milana Cap: My name is Milana Cap, and I’m on a project WPCLI as MCP. MCP stands for Milana Cap pro. No, it doesn’t

[00:18:09] Nathan Wrigley: What is the intention of this project then?

[00:18:11] Milana Cap: We are introducing AI into WPCLI. So, you could use AI in different aspects of WordPress, like content creation and all of that. But it was missing in development process, especially in local instances. So now we have that, and it’s actually a lot of fun. Much more fun than I thought.

[00:18:32] Nathan Wrigley: And how’s it going so far?

[00:18:34] Milana Cap: So far we build a spam machine, and that’s official name. And we actually had a MVP on first day. It’s really fun. Yeah. And we are just learning how this AI is behaving by itself in our locals.

[00:18:52] Patricia BT: Hello, Nathan. I’m Patricia BT. I’m living in Geneva, Switzerland. I speak French, and I am my own boss, . And I came, with that pitch, as a project for the Hackathon because for me it’s very important to own your data and preserve what exists on the web, and not lose anything.

[00:19:11] Nathan Wrigley: And what’s the name of your project?

[00:19:13] Patricia BT: CMS Freedom.

[00:19:14] Nathan Wrigley: And how’s it going so far?

[00:19:16] Patricia BT: It’s going very well. We have, tech people here, engineer, who are doing amazing work with, especially LLMs. So we are using AI to grab any HTML content and discover the format, the elements, and then later be able to import that into WordPress block theme.

For now it’s WordPress block theme and content. And later the hope is that people from other CMSs, other system, can just modify that last bit and import what the tool extracts, and import to their own system. So we can move from any HTML, render any page on the web and create that for your CMS.

[00:19:59] Nemanja Cimbaljevic: Hi, I am Nemanja. I come from Serbia and currently I’m with GoDaddy as a software engineer.

[00:20:05] Nathan Wrigley: And what’s the name of your project?

[00:20:07] Nemanja Cimbaljevic: I will not break my tongue. We will call it AI Accessibility Content Updater.

[00:20:12] Nathan Wrigley: And what is the intention? What are you hoping to achieve over these three days?

[00:20:16] Nemanja Cimbaljevic: We will try to make a proof of concept that will allow us to move on in the future where the AI is capable to help with accessibility of the websites that can be improved? Not all of them.

[00:20:29] Nathan Wrigley: Are there any constraints around what it is that you are hoping to be able to do? Or is it literally all the accessibility?

[00:20:35] Nemanja Cimbaljevic: It’s all about accessibility, and yes, we will see where we will go. It was announced as a trial and error. So we will see if there is any trial or just error.

[00:20:48] Anne-Mieke Bovelett: Hi, I’m Anne Bovelett.

[00:20:50] Nathan Wrigley: And what’s the name of the project you’ve got at CloudFest Hackathon?

[00:20:54] Anne-Mieke Bovelett: It’s called Accessible Infographics.

[00:20:56] Nathan Wrigley: And what is the intention? What are you hoping to achieve in these three days?

[00:21:01] Anne-Mieke Bovelett: Right now we’re creating a plugin for WordPress. . And when you have infographics on your site because you produce medicine, or machines, or you have statistics on your site. You can use our WordPress block, and upload an image through that, and then it will help you to make it accessible by creating extra information under the hood.

And the best thing of this is it’s not just going to be for WordPress, because we’re conceptualizing that for others so they can easily recreate this in other open source CMSs. And it will save millions and millions of people from sitting in the dark with very important information on websites.

What it actually means is that, also when we manage to move on with this project in the next phase, we’re gonna try and do this in bulk. To do it backwards for companies that already have a lot of infographics on their website, and understand that they have to do it either by law, or because they’re smart and want higher converting web shops, for example.

And then the possibility will come that they can do that backwards in bulk, and it will save them thousands and thousands in money that they have to invest in making this happen.

[00:22:20] Wesley Stessens: Yes. My name is Wesley Stessens, and I’m from Belgium, and we work on the Peer-to-peer Federated RAG Framework with, our team.

[00:22:30] Nathan Wrigley: And can I ask, what is the intention of that project over the three days? What are you hoping to achieve?

[00:22:35] Wesley Stessens: We are hoping to achieve something that hasn’t been done before in the, in the RAG space.

So basically RAG, or Retrieval Augmented Generation is way how you can augment an LLM and AI with extra data. And we want to allow everyone to create their own databases. And anyone can just join our network with their own knowledge.

For example, someone who knows a lot about beers, they can join our network and have like a library full of all information about very specific niche beers, maybe beers they brew themselves or whatever. And then any other node in the network can ask a specific question. And then our purpose is to route that question to the best matching node in a decentralized way. So there’s no servers or big companies. In between everything is done in a peer to peer way. So they get back the best matching documents from other people’s libraries, so to speak.

And then we use that to ask an LLM, or an AI a question with the context that we got from other people’s databases that matched best. And now we show the results to the user, or we create like a chat interface maybe around that. That’s the end result that we hope to achieve.

[00:23:49] Tadas Pukas: I’m Tadas.

[00:23:50] Nathan Wrigley: And what is the name of the project?

[00:23:52] Tadas Pukas: It’s WordPress Staging Environment Manager. It’s a bit complex to understand, but it does very simple thing.

[00:23:59] Nathan Wrigley: And what’s the intention at the end of these three days? What would you ideally like to be shipping? Have finished?

[00:24:05] Tadas Pukas: Yeah, so we want to have open source plugin, and actually we have it almost, so it’s the final touches.

And this will be distributed. It’s already in the public GitHub repo. So people will be able to download zip file, install a plugin, and create staging environments. Not only create but sync changes from staging to live. Actually, our name of the plugin is Staging to Live, so it’s, yeah, almost done.

Almost ready.

[00:24:29] Nathan Wrigley: Okay. I hope that you enjoyed this different style of podcast. Hopefully you learned something about CloudFest and the CloudFest Hackathon.

You certainly got to hear from a wide variety of contributors, and got to peel back the curtain about what a hackathon is, and the different projects people work on. There’s a great energy at events like this, and maybe this will convince you to explore hackathons in the future.

You don’t need to be a coder. Each project needs a wide array of talents from coders to marketers, designers, to project wranglers.

Like I said, at the top of the show, CloudFest 2026 is just around the corner. There’s an annual event both in the US and the one discussed here in Germany.

If you’re interested in finding out more, you can find all of the links in the show notes by heading to wptavern.com/podcast.

And we’ll be back next week with more from CloudFest and the CloudFest Hackathon.